The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

IF 2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11782218231172054
Kyra N Farrelly, Jeffrey D Wardell, Emma Marsden, Molly L Scarfe, Peter Najdzionek, Jasmine Turna, James MacKillop
{"title":"The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Kyra N Farrelly,&nbsp;Jeffrey D Wardell,&nbsp;Emma Marsden,&nbsp;Molly L Scarfe,&nbsp;Peter Najdzionek,&nbsp;Jasmine Turna,&nbsp;James MacKillop","doi":"10.1177/11782218231172054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recreational cannabis legalization has become more prevalent over the past decade, increasing the need to understand its impact on downstream health-related outcomes. Although prior reviews have broadly summarized research on cannabis liberalization policies (including decriminalization and medical legalization), directed efforts are needed to synthesize the more recent research that focuses on recreational cannabis legalization specifically. Thus, the current review summarizes existing studies using longitudinal designs to evaluate impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use and related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive bibliographic search strategy revealed 61 studies published from 2016 to 2022 that met criteria for inclusion. The studies were predominantly from the United States (66.2%) and primarily utilized self-report data (for cannabis use and attitudes) or administrative data (for health-related, driving, and crime outcomes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main categories of outcomes were identified through the review: cannabis and other substance use, attitudes toward cannabis, health-care utilization, driving-related outcomes, and crime-related outcomes. The extant literature revealed mixed findings, including some evidence of negative consequences of legalization (such as increased young adult use, cannabis-related healthcare visits, and impaired driving) and some evidence for minimal impacts (such as little change in adolescent cannabis use rates, substance use rates, and mixed evidence for changes in cannabis-related attitudes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the existing literature reveals a number of negative consequences of legalization, although the findings are mixed and generally do not suggest large magnitude short-term impacts. The review highlights the need for more systematic investigation, particularly across a greater diversity of geographic regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"17 ","pages":"11782218231172054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176789/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231172054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Recreational cannabis legalization has become more prevalent over the past decade, increasing the need to understand its impact on downstream health-related outcomes. Although prior reviews have broadly summarized research on cannabis liberalization policies (including decriminalization and medical legalization), directed efforts are needed to synthesize the more recent research that focuses on recreational cannabis legalization specifically. Thus, the current review summarizes existing studies using longitudinal designs to evaluate impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use and related outcomes.

Method: A comprehensive bibliographic search strategy revealed 61 studies published from 2016 to 2022 that met criteria for inclusion. The studies were predominantly from the United States (66.2%) and primarily utilized self-report data (for cannabis use and attitudes) or administrative data (for health-related, driving, and crime outcomes).

Results: Five main categories of outcomes were identified through the review: cannabis and other substance use, attitudes toward cannabis, health-care utilization, driving-related outcomes, and crime-related outcomes. The extant literature revealed mixed findings, including some evidence of negative consequences of legalization (such as increased young adult use, cannabis-related healthcare visits, and impaired driving) and some evidence for minimal impacts (such as little change in adolescent cannabis use rates, substance use rates, and mixed evidence for changes in cannabis-related attitudes).

Conclusions: Overall, the existing literature reveals a number of negative consequences of legalization, although the findings are mixed and generally do not suggest large magnitude short-term impacts. The review highlights the need for more systematic investigation, particularly across a greater diversity of geographic regions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
娱乐性大麻合法化对大麻使用和相关结果的影响:一项系统综述。
背景:在过去十年中,娱乐性大麻合法化变得更加普遍,因此更需要了解其对下游健康相关结果的影响。虽然以前的审查大致总结了关于大麻自由化政策的研究(包括非刑事化和医疗合法化),但需要有针对性地综合最近专门侧重于娱乐性大麻合法化的研究。因此,本综述总结了利用纵向设计来评估娱乐性大麻合法化对大麻使用和相关结果的影响的现有研究。方法:综合书目检索策略显示了2016年至2022年发表的61篇符合纳入标准的研究。这些研究主要来自美国(66.2%),主要利用自我报告数据(关于大麻使用和态度)或行政数据(关于健康、驾驶和犯罪结果)。结果:通过审查确定了五类主要结果:大麻和其他物质使用、对大麻的态度、保健利用、与驾驶有关的结果和与犯罪有关的结果。现有文献揭示了各种各样的发现,包括一些证据表明大麻合法化产生了负面后果(如年轻人使用大麻、与大麻有关的医疗保健就诊和驾驶障碍增加),也有一些证据表明影响很小(如青少年大麻使用率和物质使用率变化不大,以及大麻相关态度变化的混合证据)。结论:总体而言,现有文献揭示了大麻合法化的一些负面后果,尽管研究结果好坏参半,而且通常不会产生大规模的短期影响。该报告强调需要进行更系统的调查,特别是在更多样化的地理区域进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Substance Use Disorders on Suicidal Ideation, Planning, and Attempts: A Nationally Representative Study of Adolescents and Adults in the United States, 2020. Reconsidering the Terminology: Study Participants as "Subjects" or Not? Recovering Individuals' Feelings About Addict and Alcoholic as Stigmatized Terms: Implications for Treatment. Untrained Bystanders Administering Drone-Delivered Naloxone: An Exploratory Study. Integrated Supports for Women and Girls Experiencing Substance Use and Complex Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1