Incidence, Risk Factors and Effective Treatment Strategies for Chylothorax After Pediatric Heart Surgeries: Retrospective Analysis of Large Database in Single Institution.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1341
Muhammad Shahzad, Yasser A Alheraish, Reem M E Beheri, Bushra Algethami, Patricia Machado, Gamal Mohamed, Fared Khouqeer, Zohair Al Halees
{"title":"Incidence, Risk Factors and Effective Treatment Strategies for Chylothorax After Pediatric Heart Surgeries: Retrospective Analysis of Large Database in Single Institution.","authors":"Muhammad Shahzad,&nbsp;Yasser A Alheraish,&nbsp;Reem M E Beheri,&nbsp;Bushra Algethami,&nbsp;Patricia Machado,&nbsp;Gamal Mohamed,&nbsp;Fared Khouqeer,&nbsp;Zohair Al Halees","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for postoperative chylothorax in children who had cardiothoracic procedures are not always clear. Due to complex course in post-operative care, It's always challenging to find the risk factors, and their management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of our study was to identify the incidence, risk factors and effective treatment approaches for chylothorax after pediatric heart surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children who had the cardiac surgery and subsequently developed chylothorax were included in the study. The ratio of the experimental group to the control group was 1:2. Decannulations of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were not included in the analysis of patient outcomes. For each patient, we keep track of their age, weight, gender, syndrome, RACH-1 scoring, fluid balance, bypass time, clamp time, redo operations, open or close heart surgeries, and rhythm difficulties. Care logs were kept for every single therapy that was administered. Primary outcome was chylothorax, with secondary outcomes included time in the intensive care unit (ICU), length of hospital stay (LOS), and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5210 surgeries were performed in six years. 96 patients developed the chylothorax with incidence of 1.8%. In chylothorax group, mean weight was 6.7 ± 4.2, while mean age was 11.7 ± 15.2. Clamp time was 74.5 ± 53.5 versus 39.9 ± 13.7. Mean bypass time was 128.34(76.25) versus 84.3 ± 25.1 with an odds ratio 1.02 (Z test 0.0001). Six (6.3%) children with chylothorax had redo cardiac surgeries in the same admission (p-value 0.01) while none in other. Five (5.2%) cases got operated by thoracotomy, three from left side. Mean Chest tube duration was 10±7.8 days versus 3.8±2.4 in control group. (p-value 0.02). chylothorax resolved (mean resolving time = 4 days) in 76 (79.2%) children with monogen formula. Two patients receive midodrine with no significant effect. Four children underwent surgical repair for chylothorax.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bypass time linearly increases incidence of chylothorax. Younger age, low weight, syndromic children, redo operations, non-open-heart surgeries, and arrhythmias also contribute to this. Gender, fluid balance, and RACHS-1 Scoring were not significant. While further research and testing are required for the use of midodrine. However, the low-fat formula of Monogen has proven to be an effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"35 2","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/b5/sha169-176.PMC10351867.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Risk factors for postoperative chylothorax in children who had cardiothoracic procedures are not always clear. Due to complex course in post-operative care, It's always challenging to find the risk factors, and their management.

Objective: The aim of our study was to identify the incidence, risk factors and effective treatment approaches for chylothorax after pediatric heart surgery.

Methods: Children who had the cardiac surgery and subsequently developed chylothorax were included in the study. The ratio of the experimental group to the control group was 1:2. Decannulations of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were not included in the analysis of patient outcomes. For each patient, we keep track of their age, weight, gender, syndrome, RACH-1 scoring, fluid balance, bypass time, clamp time, redo operations, open or close heart surgeries, and rhythm difficulties. Care logs were kept for every single therapy that was administered. Primary outcome was chylothorax, with secondary outcomes included time in the intensive care unit (ICU), length of hospital stay (LOS), and death.

Results: 5210 surgeries were performed in six years. 96 patients developed the chylothorax with incidence of 1.8%. In chylothorax group, mean weight was 6.7 ± 4.2, while mean age was 11.7 ± 15.2. Clamp time was 74.5 ± 53.5 versus 39.9 ± 13.7. Mean bypass time was 128.34(76.25) versus 84.3 ± 25.1 with an odds ratio 1.02 (Z test 0.0001). Six (6.3%) children with chylothorax had redo cardiac surgeries in the same admission (p-value 0.01) while none in other. Five (5.2%) cases got operated by thoracotomy, three from left side. Mean Chest tube duration was 10±7.8 days versus 3.8±2.4 in control group. (p-value 0.02). chylothorax resolved (mean resolving time = 4 days) in 76 (79.2%) children with monogen formula. Two patients receive midodrine with no significant effect. Four children underwent surgical repair for chylothorax.

Conclusion: Bypass time linearly increases incidence of chylothorax. Younger age, low weight, syndromic children, redo operations, non-open-heart surgeries, and arrhythmias also contribute to this. Gender, fluid balance, and RACHS-1 Scoring were not significant. While further research and testing are required for the use of midodrine. However, the low-fat formula of Monogen has proven to be an effective treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童心脏手术后乳糜胸的发生率、危险因素及有效治疗策略:单一机构大型数据库的回顾性分析。
背景:儿童心胸外科手术后乳糜胸的危险因素并不总是很清楚。由于术后护理过程复杂,发现危险因素及其处理一直是一项挑战。目的:探讨小儿心脏手术后乳糜胸的发生率、危险因素及有效的治疗方法。方法:对心脏手术后发生乳糜胸的患儿进行研究。实验组与对照组的比例为1:2。体外膜氧合(ECMO)的脱管不包括在患者结果的分析中。对于每位患者,我们记录他们的年龄、体重、性别、综合征、RACH-1评分、体液平衡、搭桥时间、钳夹时间、重做手术、心脏开闭手术和节律困难。每次治疗的护理记录都被保存下来。主要结局为乳糜胸,次要结局包括在重症监护病房(ICU)的时间、住院时间(LOS)和死亡。结果:6年内共手术5210例。96例发生乳糜胸,发生率1.8%。乳糜胸组平均体重6.7±4.2,平均年龄11.7±15.2。夹钳时间分别为74.5±53.5和39.9±13.7。平均旁路手术时间为128.34(76.25)比84.3±25.1,优势比为1.02 (Z检验为0.0001)。6例乳糜胸患儿(6.3%)在同一次住院期间再次行心脏手术(p值为0.01),而其他患儿无一例。行开胸手术5例(5.2%),其中左侧开胸3例。平均胸管时间为10±7.8天,对照组为3.8±2.4天。(假定值0.02)。76例(79.2%)患儿乳糜胸缓解(平均缓解时间为4天)。2例患者接受米多宁治疗,无明显疗效。四名儿童接受了乳糜胸手术修复。结论:搭桥时间与乳糜胸发生率呈线性关系。年龄较小、体重过轻、有综合征的儿童、重做手术、非开胸手术和心律失常也会导致这种情况。性别、体液平衡、RACHS-1评分差异无统计学意义。而米多宁的使用还需要进一步的研究和测试。然而,Monogen的低脂配方已被证明是一种有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Zilebesiran and Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus. Redo Minimally Invasive Right Atrial Mass Removal After Surgical Atrial Septal Defect Closure. Perspectives of Policymakers on Barriers to and Enablers of the Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study. Assessment of Coronary Collaterals Among Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and its Impact on In-hospital and 30-day Mortality: A Prospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1