A quality improvement project addressing the underreporting of delirium in hip fracture patients

Naoko Onizuka , Fernando A. Huyke-Hernández , Myriam A. Roby , Tom F. Martell , Rachael M. Scislow , Sarah C. Jones , Andrew Olson , Nicole James , Julie A. Switzer
{"title":"A quality improvement project addressing the underreporting of delirium in hip fracture patients","authors":"Naoko Onizuka ,&nbsp;Fernando A. Huyke-Hernández ,&nbsp;Myriam A. Roby ,&nbsp;Tom F. Martell ,&nbsp;Rachael M. Scislow ,&nbsp;Sarah C. Jones ,&nbsp;Andrew Olson ,&nbsp;Nicole James ,&nbsp;Julie A. Switzer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>After discovering a low incidence of delirium for hip fracture patients at our institution, we evaluated if this was due to underreporting and, if so, where process errors occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Hip fracture patients aged ≥60 with a diagnosis of delirium were identified. Chart-Based Delirium Identification Instrument (CHART-DEL) identified missed diagnoses of delirium. Process maps were created based off staff interviews and observations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The incidence of delirium was 15.3% (N = 176). Within a random sample (n = 98), 15 patients (15.5%) were diagnosed, while 20 (24.7%) went undiagnosed despite evidence of delirium. Including missed diagnoses, delirium prevalence was higher in the sample compared to all patients (35.7% vs 15.3%, p &lt; 0.001). Most missed diagnoses were due to failure in identifying delirium (60%) or failure in documenting/coding diagnosis (20%). The prevalence of baseline cognitive impairment was higher in undiagnosed delirium patients versus correctly diagnosed patients (80% vs 20%, p = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our institution significantly underreports delirium among hip fracture patients mainly due to; (1) failure to identify delirium by the clinical staff, and (2) failure to document/code diagnosis despite correct identification. Baseline cognitive impairment can render delirium diagnosis challenging. These serve as targets for quality improvement and hip fracture care enhancement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124122000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

After discovering a low incidence of delirium for hip fracture patients at our institution, we evaluated if this was due to underreporting and, if so, where process errors occurred.

Methods

Hip fracture patients aged ≥60 with a diagnosis of delirium were identified. Chart-Based Delirium Identification Instrument (CHART-DEL) identified missed diagnoses of delirium. Process maps were created based off staff interviews and observations.

Results

The incidence of delirium was 15.3% (N = 176). Within a random sample (n = 98), 15 patients (15.5%) were diagnosed, while 20 (24.7%) went undiagnosed despite evidence of delirium. Including missed diagnoses, delirium prevalence was higher in the sample compared to all patients (35.7% vs 15.3%, p < 0.001). Most missed diagnoses were due to failure in identifying delirium (60%) or failure in documenting/coding diagnosis (20%). The prevalence of baseline cognitive impairment was higher in undiagnosed delirium patients versus correctly diagnosed patients (80% vs 20%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Our institution significantly underreports delirium among hip fracture patients mainly due to; (1) failure to identify delirium by the clinical staff, and (2) failure to document/code diagnosis despite correct identification. Baseline cognitive impairment can render delirium diagnosis challenging. These serve as targets for quality improvement and hip fracture care enhancement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决髋部骨折患者谵妄漏报的质量改进项目
在发现我院髋部骨折患者谵妄发生率较低后,我们评估了这是否是由于漏报所致,如果是,则发生了处理错误。方法选择年龄≥60岁伴有谵妄的骨折患者。基于图表的谵妄鉴别仪(CHART-DEL)识别谵妄的漏诊。流程图是根据员工访谈和观察创建的。结果谵妄发生率为15.3%(176例)。在随机抽样(n = 98)中,15名患者(15.5%)被诊断,而20名患者(24.7%)尽管有谵妄的证据但未被诊断。包括漏诊在内,样本中谵妄患病率高于所有患者(35.7% vs 15.3%, p <0.001)。大多数漏诊是由于未能识别谵妄(60%)或未能记录/编码诊断(20%)。未确诊谵妄患者的基线认知障碍患病率高于正确诊断的患者(80% vs 20%, p = 0.001)。结论我院对髋部骨折患者谵妄的低报主要是由于;(1)临床工作人员未能识别谵妄,(2)尽管有正确的识别,但未能记录/编码诊断。基线认知障碍可使谵妄诊断具有挑战性。这些可作为质量改善和髋部骨折护理加强的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Postoperative delirium in geriatric orthopedic and trauma patients: Care begins preoperatively! Older patients' experiences of shared decision-making when choosing treatment for their distal radius fracture; A qualitative study Long-term maintenance of a fragility fracture initiative Editorial Board Corrigendum to “The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review” [Int. J. Orthopaed. Trauma Nurs. 53 (2024) 101048]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1