Changing populations being treated with ECMO in the neonatal period – who are the others?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.siny.2022.101402
Allison T. Rose, Sarah Keene
{"title":"Changing populations being treated with ECMO in the neonatal period – who are the others?","authors":"Allison T. Rose,&nbsp;Sarah Keene","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2022.101402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Extracorporeal life support<span><span> via extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has served the sickest of neonates for almost 50 years. Naturally, the characteristics of neonates receiving ECMO have changed. Advances in care have averted the need for ECMO for some, while complex cases with uncertain outcomes, previously not eligible for ECMO, are now considered. Characterizing the disease states and outcomes for neonates on ECMO is challenging as many infants do not fall into classic categories, i.e. </span>meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), </span></span>respiratory distress syndrome<span> (RDS), or congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Since 2017, over one third of neonatal respiratory ECMO runs reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry are grouped as </span></span><em>Other</em><span><span>, a catch-all that encompasses those with a diagnosis not included in the classic categories. This review summarizes the historical neonatal ECMO population, reviews advances in therapy and technology impacting </span>neonatal care, and addresses the unknowns in the ever-growing category of </span><em>Other.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"27 6","pages":"Article 101402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744165X22000816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Extracorporeal life support via extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has served the sickest of neonates for almost 50 years. Naturally, the characteristics of neonates receiving ECMO have changed. Advances in care have averted the need for ECMO for some, while complex cases with uncertain outcomes, previously not eligible for ECMO, are now considered. Characterizing the disease states and outcomes for neonates on ECMO is challenging as many infants do not fall into classic categories, i.e. meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), or congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Since 2017, over one third of neonatal respiratory ECMO runs reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry are grouped as Other, a catch-all that encompasses those with a diagnosis not included in the classic categories. This review summarizes the historical neonatal ECMO population, reviews advances in therapy and technology impacting neonatal care, and addresses the unknowns in the ever-growing category of Other.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿期ECMO治疗人群的变化-其他人群是谁?
通过体外膜氧合(ECMO)的体外生命支持服务于病情最严重的新生儿近50年。自然,接受ECMO的新生儿的特征已经改变。护理的进步使一些患者不再需要体外膜肺,而以前不适合体外膜肺的结果不确定的复杂病例现在被考虑。表征ECMO新生儿的疾病状态和结果具有挑战性,因为许多婴儿不属于经典类别,即胎粪吸入综合征(MAS),呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)或先天性膈疝(CDH)。自2017年以来,向体外生命支持组织登记处报告的超过三分之一的新生儿呼吸ECMO运行被归类为其他,这是一个包罗万象的概念,包括那些诊断不包括在经典类别中的患者。这篇综述总结了新生儿ECMO的历史,回顾了影响新生儿护理的治疗和技术进展,并解决了不断增长的其他类别的未知问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (formerly Seminars in Neonatology) is a bi-monthly journal which publishes topic-based issues, including current ''Hot Topics'' on the latest advances in fetal and neonatal medicine. The Journal is of interest to obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. The Journal commissions review-based content covering current clinical opinion on the care and treatment of the pregnant patient and the neonate and draws on the necessary specialist knowledge, including that of the pediatric pulmonologist, the pediatric infectious disease specialist, the surgeon, as well as the general pediatrician and obstetrician. Each topic-based issue is edited by an authority in their field and contains 8-10 articles. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine provides: • Coverage of major developments in neonatal care; • Value to practising neonatologists, consultant and trainee pediatricians, obstetricians, midwives and fetal medicine specialists wishing to extend their knowledge in this field; • Up-to-date information in an attractive and relevant format.
期刊最新文献
Advocating for neonatology presence at births between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation. High-frequency jet ventilation in ELBW infants: A review and update. Assessment of Global Burden due to neonatal encephalopathy: An economic evaluation. Late preterm and early term birth: Challenges and dilemmas in clinical practice. Neonatal delirium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1