Comparative electrocardiographic study of the Asian freshwater box turtle Cuora flavomarginata and the Asian yellow pond turtle Mauremys mutica using non-invasive methods.

IF 1.3 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Record Open Pub Date : 2022-12-08 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1002/vro2.52
Chin-Chia Kuo, I-Ping Chan, Cheng-Hung Lai
{"title":"Comparative electrocardiographic study of the Asian freshwater box turtle <i>Cuora flavomarginata</i> and the Asian yellow pond turtle <i>Mauremys mutica</i> using non-invasive methods.","authors":"Chin-Chia Kuo, I-Ping Chan, Cheng-Hung Lai","doi":"10.1002/vro2.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of cardiac function is an integral part of clinical examination of chelonians. However, information about electrocardiography (ECG) in turtles and tortoises is limited and fragmentary. Its application is limited due to the lack of ECG reference values. This study aimed to compare specific ECG parameters using non-invasive methods in the Asian box turtle <i>Cuora flavomarginata</i> (CF) and the Asian yellow pond turtle <i>Mauremys mutica</i> (MM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 116 clinically healthy and conscious turtles. Two non-invasive methods, using adhesive patches or crocodile clips, for ECG were applied where possible. The ambient temperature was within the preferred optimum temperature zone of both species. We used specific digital ECG monitoring equipment to record the ECG data and analysed the data using specific software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MM group showed better ECG quality and lower heart rate than the CF group. Comparing both methods, the adhesive patches method yielded higher ECG quality in the CF group, while the crocodile clips method yielded higher ECG quality in the MM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study population was selected as presumed healthy turtles; the presence of systemic or cardiac disease could not be excluded completely due to limited investigation. Both ECG methods were clinically potentially useful for obtaining ECG parameters; the ECG quality was influenced by the method used.</p>","PeriodicalId":23565,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vro2.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of cardiac function is an integral part of clinical examination of chelonians. However, information about electrocardiography (ECG) in turtles and tortoises is limited and fragmentary. Its application is limited due to the lack of ECG reference values. This study aimed to compare specific ECG parameters using non-invasive methods in the Asian box turtle Cuora flavomarginata (CF) and the Asian yellow pond turtle Mauremys mutica (MM).

Methods: We included 116 clinically healthy and conscious turtles. Two non-invasive methods, using adhesive patches or crocodile clips, for ECG were applied where possible. The ambient temperature was within the preferred optimum temperature zone of both species. We used specific digital ECG monitoring equipment to record the ECG data and analysed the data using specific software.

Results: The MM group showed better ECG quality and lower heart rate than the CF group. Comparing both methods, the adhesive patches method yielded higher ECG quality in the CF group, while the crocodile clips method yielded higher ECG quality in the MM group.

Conclusions: The study population was selected as presumed healthy turtles; the presence of systemic or cardiac disease could not be excluded completely due to limited investigation. Both ECG methods were clinically potentially useful for obtaining ECG parameters; the ECG quality was influenced by the method used.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用无创方法对亚洲淡水箱龟(Cuora flavomarginata)和亚洲黄塘龟(Mauremys mutica)进行心电图比较研究。
背景:评估心脏功能是螯类动物临床检查不可或缺的一部分。然而,有关龟类和陆龟心电图(ECG)的信息非常有限且零碎。由于缺乏心电图参考值,其应用也受到限制。本研究旨在使用无创方法比较亚洲箱龟(Cuora flavomarginata,CF)和亚洲黄塘龟(Mauremys mutica,MM)的特定心电图参数:我们纳入了 116 只临床健康且有意识的龟。在可能的情况下,我们采用了两种非侵入性方法,即使用胶贴或鳄鱼夹进行心电图检查。环境温度在两种龟的最适温度范围内。我们使用特定的数字心电图监测设备记录心电图数据,并使用特定软件对数据进行分析:结果:MM 组比 CF 组显示出更好的心电图质量和更低的心率。比较两种方法,粘贴法在 CF 组的心电图质量更高,而鳄鱼夹法在 MM 组的心电图质量更高:结论:研究对象被选为假定健康的龟类;由于调查有限,不能完全排除存在系统性或心脏疾病的可能性。两种心电图方法在临床上都可用于获取心电图参数;心电图质量受所用方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Record Open
Veterinary Record Open VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record Open is a journal dedicated to publishing specialist veterinary research across a range of topic areas including those of a more niche and specialist nature to that considered in the weekly Vet Record. Research from all disciplines of veterinary interest will be considered. It is an Open Access journal of the British Veterinary Association.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Thoroughbred yearling sales price in the UK. Surveyed veterinary students in Australia find ChatGPT practical and relevant while expressing no concern about artificial intelligence replacing veterinarians. A scoping review on the use of reflection and reflective portfolio learning in veterinary education. Identifying veterinary surgeons’ barriers to, and potential solutions for, improving antimicrobial stewardship among sheep farmers in Northern Ireland Analysis of lower urinary tract signs and bacteriuria in cats with subcutaneous ureteral bypass systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1