[Positive experiences of specialist assistants and physicians with respect to the delegation research project StaerkeR : Evaluation of the training and experiences within the framework of this project].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-09 DOI:10.1007/s00393-022-01298-y
Anna Mai, Sandra Abrantes Diaz, Michelle Stein, Robin Denz, Renate Klaaßen-Mielke, Nina Timmesfeld, Dietmar Krause, Jürgen Braun
{"title":"[Positive experiences of specialist assistants and physicians with respect to the delegation research project StaerkeR : Evaluation of the training and experiences within the framework of this project].","authors":"Anna Mai, Sandra Abrantes Diaz, Michelle Stein, Robin Denz, Renate Klaaßen-Mielke, Nina Timmesfeld, Dietmar Krause, Jürgen Braun","doi":"10.1007/s00393-022-01298-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The delegation of medical services to rheumatology assistants (RFA) has proven to be safe and effective in the evaluation of the research project \"StaerkeR\". Afterwards, the experiences of the participating RFAs and rheumatologists with delegation were surveyed and discussed within the framework of an opinion research project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the end of the project, the participating RFAs and rheumatologists were surveyed via an online questionnaire (quantitative analysis) (21 questions for physicians and 44 questions for RFAs). In addition, focus group meetings were held for the RFAs, which were led by a moderator and a secretary. The results of the focus group sessions (qualitative analyses) were analyzed according to the structured method of Kuckartz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 31 RFAs and 25 rheumatologists involved in the project participated in the online surveys and 9 RFAs took part in the 2 focus groups. In the online surveys, both the RFAs and the rheumatologists gave predominantly good to very good ratings with respect to RFA training, the implementation of delegation in the practices and outpatient clinics, the role of the RFAs and the overall evaluation of the delegation concept. In the focus group discussions, many possible limitations regarding acceptance and implementation of the delegation concept were mentioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The delegation of medical tasks to RFAs is a concept that is positively assessed and highly accepted by both sides, the rheumatologists and the RFAs. In a comparison between the individual practices and hospital outpatient departments, there is still a clear heterogeneity with respect to the willingness and logistical possibilities in the implementation of the delegation concept.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-022-01298-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The delegation of medical services to rheumatology assistants (RFA) has proven to be safe and effective in the evaluation of the research project "StaerkeR". Afterwards, the experiences of the participating RFAs and rheumatologists with delegation were surveyed and discussed within the framework of an opinion research project.

Methods: At the end of the project, the participating RFAs and rheumatologists were surveyed via an online questionnaire (quantitative analysis) (21 questions for physicians and 44 questions for RFAs). In addition, focus group meetings were held for the RFAs, which were led by a moderator and a secretary. The results of the focus group sessions (qualitative analyses) were analyzed according to the structured method of Kuckartz.

Results: All 31 RFAs and 25 rheumatologists involved in the project participated in the online surveys and 9 RFAs took part in the 2 focus groups. In the online surveys, both the RFAs and the rheumatologists gave predominantly good to very good ratings with respect to RFA training, the implementation of delegation in the practices and outpatient clinics, the role of the RFAs and the overall evaluation of the delegation concept. In the focus group discussions, many possible limitations regarding acceptance and implementation of the delegation concept were mentioned.

Conclusion: The delegation of medical tasks to RFAs is a concept that is positively assessed and highly accepted by both sides, the rheumatologists and the RFAs. In a comparison between the individual practices and hospital outpatient departments, there is still a clear heterogeneity with respect to the willingness and logistical possibilities in the implementation of the delegation concept.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[专家助理和医生在委托研究项目 "StaerkeR:项目框架内的培训和经验评估 "中的积极经验]。
导言:在 "StaerkeR "研究项目的评估中,将医疗服务委托给风湿病学助理(RFA)被证明是安全有效的。随后,在民意调查项目的框架内,对参与项目的风湿病学助理和风湿病学专家的委托经验进行了调查和讨论:在项目结束时,通过在线问卷(定量分析)(针对医生的 21 个问题和针对 RFA 的 44 个问题)对参与项目的 RFA 和风湿病医生进行了调查。此外,还为风湿病学家举行了焦点小组会议,会议由一名主持人和一名秘书主持。焦点小组会议的结果(定性分析)按照 Kuckartz 的结构化方法进行了分析:参与项目的所有 31 位区域外科医生和 25 位风湿病学家都参加了在线调查,9 位区域外科医生参加了 2 个焦点小组。在网上调查中,区域联邦医生和风湿病学家对区域联邦医生的培训、在诊所和门诊实施委托治疗的情况、区域联邦医生的作用以及对委托治疗理念的总体评价均以 "好 "和 "非常好 "为主。在焦点小组讨论中,与会者提到了在接受和实施委托概念方面可能存在的许多限制:结论:风湿免疫科医生和风湿免疫科医师双方都积极评价并高度认可向风湿免疫科医师下放医疗任务的理念。在个体诊所和医院门诊部之间进行比较时,在实施委托概念的意愿和后勤可能性方面仍存在明显的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie ist ein international angesehenes Publikationsorgan und dient der Fortbildung von niedergelassenen und in der Klinik tätigen Rheumatologen. Die Zeitschrift widmet sich allen Aspekten der klinischen Rheumatologie, der Therapie rheumatischer Erkrankungen sowie der rheumatologischen Grundlagenforschung. Umfassende Übersichtsarbeiten zu einem aktuellen Schwerpunktthema sind das Kernstück jeder Ausgabe. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei gesichertes Wissen zu Diagnostik und Therapie mit hoher Relevanz für die tägliche Arbeit – der Leser erhält konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen. Frei eingereichte Originalien ermöglichen die Präsentation wichtiger klinischer Studien und dienen dem wissenschaftlichen Austausch.
期刊最新文献
[Update on Behçet syndrome]. [Treatment of VEXAS syndrome]. [Cognitive training and physical therapy for fibromyalgia : Results of the KogTraP pilot study]. [Synovial chondromatosis : Results from the histopathological arthritis register of the German Society for Orthopedic Rheumatology]. YouTube as a source of information on reactive arthritis: a quality analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1