Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Sleep-Disordered Breathing Patients.

Elvie Zulka Kautzia Rachmawati, Retno S Wardhani, Rahmanofa Yunizaf, Saptawati Bardosono, Fikri Mirza Putranto, Niken Ageng Rizki, Nabilla Calista, Susyana Tamin
{"title":"Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Sleep-Disordered Breathing Patients.","authors":"Elvie Zulka Kautzia Rachmawati,&nbsp;Retno S Wardhani,&nbsp;Rahmanofa Yunizaf,&nbsp;Saptawati Bardosono,&nbsp;Fikri Mirza Putranto,&nbsp;Niken Ageng Rizki,&nbsp;Nabilla Calista,&nbsp;Susyana Tamin","doi":"10.22038/IJORL.2022.57515.2991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our study aims to evaluate the distribution of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) via the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and to describe the sleep architecture in SDB patients with and without LPR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted. Patients with SDB were identified via the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-BANG questionnaire; they were then screened with the RSI and physical examination for LPR. PSG was performed to evaluate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 45 patients, 15 were scored as having LPR via the RSI. Utilizing the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI), patients were further classified into four groups: 9 non-LPR with non-OSA SDB, 21 non-LPR with OSA, 4 LPR with non-OSA SDB, and 11 LPR with OSA. The prevalence of LPR was 30.8% in the non-OSA SDB group and 34.4% in the OSA group. All SDB parameters in both groups were similar. SDB patients with high body mass index tended to have LPR and/or OSA. Average ESS scores in the four groups suggested excessive daytime sleepiness, and patients with LPR had higher ESS scores. Regardless of LPR status, SDB patients had a lower percentage of REM sleep and a higher percentage of light sleep.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of LPR in OSA patients was similar in non-OSA SDB patients. REM sleep percentage decreased in the four groups, with the non-OSA SDB group having the lowest percentage of REM sleep; light sleep percentage increased in the four groups, with the OSA group having the highest percentage of light sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":14607,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"34 125","pages":"303-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9709391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2022.57515.2991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our study aims to evaluate the distribution of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) via the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and to describe the sleep architecture in SDB patients with and without LPR.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted. Patients with SDB were identified via the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-BANG questionnaire; they were then screened with the RSI and physical examination for LPR. PSG was performed to evaluate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Results: Of 45 patients, 15 were scored as having LPR via the RSI. Utilizing the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI), patients were further classified into four groups: 9 non-LPR with non-OSA SDB, 21 non-LPR with OSA, 4 LPR with non-OSA SDB, and 11 LPR with OSA. The prevalence of LPR was 30.8% in the non-OSA SDB group and 34.4% in the OSA group. All SDB parameters in both groups were similar. SDB patients with high body mass index tended to have LPR and/or OSA. Average ESS scores in the four groups suggested excessive daytime sleepiness, and patients with LPR had higher ESS scores. Regardless of LPR status, SDB patients had a lower percentage of REM sleep and a higher percentage of light sleep.

Conclusions: The incidence of LPR in OSA patients was similar in non-OSA SDB patients. REM sleep percentage decreased in the four groups, with the non-OSA SDB group having the lowest percentage of REM sleep; light sleep percentage increased in the four groups, with the OSA group having the highest percentage of light sleep.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠呼吸障碍患者的咽喉反流
前言:本研究旨在通过反流症状指数(RSI)评估睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)患者喉咽反流(LPR)的分布,描述伴有和不伴有LPR的SDB患者的睡眠结构。材料与方法:采用横断面描述性研究。通过Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)和STOP-BANG问卷对SDB患者进行识别;然后对他们进行RSI和LPR体检。采用PSG评价阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。结果:45例患者中,15例经RSI评分为LPR。采用呼吸障碍指数(RDI)将患者进一步分为4组:非LPR合并非OSA SDB 9例,非LPR合并OSA 21例,LPR合并非OSA SDB 4例,LPR合并OSA 11例。非OSA SDB组LPR患病率为30.8%,OSA组为34.4%。两组的SDB参数相似。体重指数高的SDB患者易发生LPR和/或OSA。四组的平均ESS评分表明白天嗜睡过度,LPR患者的ESS评分更高。无论LPR状态如何,SDB患者REM睡眠的比例较低,浅睡眠的比例较高。结论:OSA患者的LPR发生率与非OSA SDB患者相似。四组快速眼动睡眠比例均有所下降,其中非osa SDB组快速眼动睡眠比例最低;轻度睡眠的比例在四组中都有所增加,其中OSA组的轻度睡眠比例最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Performance of Wrist-Worn Pulse Oximeter for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Submandibular Gland Preservation in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Our Analysis at A Tertiary Care Hospital. Transnasal Endoscopic Injection of Botulinum Toxin in Patients with Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia. Evaluation of Dentofacial Angles in Children with Severe Adenoid Hypertrophy. Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa Associated Laryngeal Stenosis: A Case Report and Review of Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1