Bundled Bispectral Index Monitoring and Sedation During Paralysis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING AACN Advanced Critical Care Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI:10.4037/aacnacc2022240
Sunitha Abraham, Bethany L Lussier
{"title":"Bundled Bispectral Index Monitoring and Sedation During Paralysis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.","authors":"Sunitha Abraham,&nbsp;Bethany L Lussier","doi":"10.4037/aacnacc2022240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical assessments of depth of sedation are insufficient for patients undergoing neuromuscular blockade during treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This quality initiative was aimed to augment objective assessment and improve sedation during therapeutic paralysis using the bispectral index (BIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement intervention provided education and subsequent implementation of a BIS monitoring and sedation/analgesia bundle in a large, urban, safety-net intensive care unit. After the intervention, a retrospective review of the first 70 admissions with ARDS assessed use and documented sedation changes in response to BIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Therapeutic neuromuscular blockade was initiated for 58 of 70 patients (82.8%) with ARDS, of whom 43 (74%) had BIS monitoring and 29.3% had bundled BIS sedation-titration orders. Explicit documentation of sedation titration in response to BIS values occurred in 27 (62.8%) of those with BIS recordings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BIS sedation/analgesia bundled order sets are underused, but education and access to BIS monitoring led to high use of monitoring alone and subsequent sedation changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46461,"journal":{"name":"AACN Advanced Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN Advanced Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2022240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical assessments of depth of sedation are insufficient for patients undergoing neuromuscular blockade during treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This quality initiative was aimed to augment objective assessment and improve sedation during therapeutic paralysis using the bispectral index (BIS).

Methods: This quality improvement intervention provided education and subsequent implementation of a BIS monitoring and sedation/analgesia bundle in a large, urban, safety-net intensive care unit. After the intervention, a retrospective review of the first 70 admissions with ARDS assessed use and documented sedation changes in response to BIS.

Results: Therapeutic neuromuscular blockade was initiated for 58 of 70 patients (82.8%) with ARDS, of whom 43 (74%) had BIS monitoring and 29.3% had bundled BIS sedation-titration orders. Explicit documentation of sedation titration in response to BIS values occurred in 27 (62.8%) of those with BIS recordings.

Conclusions: BIS sedation/analgesia bundled order sets are underused, but education and access to BIS monitoring led to high use of monitoring alone and subsequent sedation changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性呼吸窘迫综合征瘫痪期间捆绑双谱指数监测与镇静。
背景:在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)治疗过程中,对神经肌肉阻滞患者镇静深度的临床评估不足。这项质量倡议旨在利用双谱指数(BIS)增强客观评估和改善治疗性瘫痪期间的镇静作用。方法:这种质量改善干预提供了教育和随后实施BIS监测和镇静/镇痛束在大型,城市,安全网重症监护病房。干预后,对前70例ARDS入院患者进行回顾性审查,评估使用情况并记录镇静变化对BIS的反应。结果:70例ARDS患者中有58例(82.8%)采用了治疗性神经肌肉阻断,其中43例(74%)有BIS监测,29.3%有BIS镇静滴定单。有BIS记录的患者中,有27人(62.8%)明确记录了镇静滴定对BIS值的反应。结论:BIS镇静/镇痛捆绑单套使用不足,但教育和获得BIS监测导致单独监测和随后镇静变化的高使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: AACN Advanced Critical Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed publication of in-depth articles intended for experienced critical care and acute care clinicians at the bedside, advanced practice nurses, and clinical and academic educators. Each issue includes a topic-based symposium, feature articles, and columns of interest to critical care and progressive care clinicians. AACN Advanced Critical Care contains concisely written, practical information for immediate use and future reference. Continuing education units are available for selected articles in each issue. AACN Advanced Critical Care is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
期刊最新文献
Acute Streptococcus pneumoniae Meningitis: A Case Report. Advancing a Nursing Culture of Inquiry: Strategies for the Community. Autonomous by Extension: Balancing Patient Autonomy and Vulnerability in Surrogate Decision-making. Case Reports in Critical Care. Competency Assessment of New Registered Nurses Using Immersive Virtual Reality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1