Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Pain Control in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease and Great Saphenous Vein Reflux.

IF 0.5 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Angiology Pub Date : 2022-11-11 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1758384
Douglas Poschinger-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Virgini-Magalhães, Claudia Salvador Amorim, Alessandra Krykhtine Peres Poschinger, Fernanda Pires Chequer
{"title":"Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Pain Control in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease and Great Saphenous Vein Reflux.","authors":"Douglas Poschinger-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Virgini-Magalhães, Claudia Salvador Amorim, Alessandra Krykhtine Peres Poschinger, Fernanda Pires Chequer","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic venous disease (CVD) associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux has a higher prevalence of pain in the lower limbs. This study evaluates the impact of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for GSV and symptom control, accessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients with CVD who underwent GSV-UGFS were included in this retrospective cohort (417 limbs). The pain was measured before and after the treatment. The scale alteration was assessed as a function of age, sex, Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classes, total of sclerotherapy sessions, GSV occlusion patterns, and ulcer healing. Majority of patients were female (59.2%), and the mean age was 56 ± 11.5 years. In the total sample, 78.2% of the GSVs were fully occluded, 19.7% had partial occlusion, 2.2% remained open, and 3.2 ± 1.9 (median = 3.0) sessions were performed. The reduction of symptoms occurred in 88.3% of participants (VAS drop median = 4.8). Patients younger than 50 years and females had the greatest VAS decreases. When comparing the outcomes of complete occlusion versus partial occlusion, there was no significant difference in VAS pain reduction ( <i>p</i>  = 0.14). The comparison between CEAP clinical classes also did not show statistically significant differences in delta VAS ( <i>p</i>  = 0.71). GSV-UGFS was effective for pain control. However, this improvement does not appear to be related to the pattern of occlusion, indicating that in the short term, the outcomes of total and partial occlusion suggest successful management of symptoms. Other aspects such as gender, age, pretreatment pain intensity, and CEAP classes seem to play a role in the clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"32 3","pages":"172-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic venous disease (CVD) associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux has a higher prevalence of pain in the lower limbs. This study evaluates the impact of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for GSV and symptom control, accessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients with CVD who underwent GSV-UGFS were included in this retrospective cohort (417 limbs). The pain was measured before and after the treatment. The scale alteration was assessed as a function of age, sex, Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classes, total of sclerotherapy sessions, GSV occlusion patterns, and ulcer healing. Majority of patients were female (59.2%), and the mean age was 56 ± 11.5 years. In the total sample, 78.2% of the GSVs were fully occluded, 19.7% had partial occlusion, 2.2% remained open, and 3.2 ± 1.9 (median = 3.0) sessions were performed. The reduction of symptoms occurred in 88.3% of participants (VAS drop median = 4.8). Patients younger than 50 years and females had the greatest VAS decreases. When comparing the outcomes of complete occlusion versus partial occlusion, there was no significant difference in VAS pain reduction ( p  = 0.14). The comparison between CEAP clinical classes also did not show statistically significant differences in delta VAS ( p  = 0.71). GSV-UGFS was effective for pain control. However, this improvement does not appear to be related to the pattern of occlusion, indicating that in the short term, the outcomes of total and partial occlusion suggest successful management of symptoms. Other aspects such as gender, age, pretreatment pain intensity, and CEAP classes seem to play a role in the clinical outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导泡沫硬化疗法对慢性静脉疾病和大隐静脉返流患者疼痛控制的影响。
与大隐静脉(GSV)反流相关的慢性静脉疾病(CVD)在下肢疼痛的发生率较高。本研究通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估超声引导泡沫硬化疗法(UGFS)对GSV和症状控制的影响。接受GSV-UGFS的CVD患者被纳入该回顾性队列(417个肢体)。治疗前后分别测量疼痛程度。量表的改变被评估为年龄、性别、临床病因、解剖病理生理(CEAP)分类、总硬化治疗时间、GSV闭塞模式和溃疡愈合的功能。患者以女性为主(59.2%),平均年龄56±11.5岁。在总样本中,78.2%的GSVs完全闭塞,19.7%为部分闭塞,2.2%保持开放,共进行了3.2±1.9(中位数= 3.0)次手术。88.3%的参与者症状减轻(VAS下降中位数= 4.8)。年龄小于50岁的患者和女性VAS下降最大。当比较完全闭塞与部分闭塞的结果时,VAS疼痛减轻无显著差异(p = 0.14)。CEAP临床分型间的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.71)。GSV-UGFS对疼痛控制有效。然而,这种改善似乎与咬合模式无关,这表明在短期内,完全和部分咬合的结果表明成功地控制了症状。其他方面,如性别,年龄,预处理疼痛强度和CEAP类别似乎在临床结果中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Grayscale Inversion to aid Diagnosis of Acute Occlusive and Chronic Pulmonary Embolism on CT. Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms. Anticoagulation in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism-A Review. Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity. Diagnostic Strategies in Pulmonary Embolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1