Positive remodelling of coronary arteries on computed tomography coronary angiogram: an observational study.

May Khei Hu, Mengshi Yuan, Sunil James, Hui Ping Lee, Fairoz Abdul, Abdel Yousif, Ahmed Hassan, Jawad Khan, Derek Connolly, Vinoda Sharma
{"title":"Positive remodelling of coronary arteries on computed tomography coronary angiogram: an observational study.","authors":"May Khei Hu,&nbsp;Mengshi Yuan,&nbsp;Sunil James,&nbsp;Hui Ping Lee,&nbsp;Fairoz Abdul,&nbsp;Abdel Yousif,&nbsp;Ahmed Hassan,&nbsp;Jawad Khan,&nbsp;Derek Connolly,&nbsp;Vinoda Sharma","doi":"10.4244/AIJ-D-21-00045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) due to atherosclerosis is projected to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide until 2040. CAD affects approximately 2.6 million people in the United Kingdom (UK), and 1 in 4 of them do not experience any symptoms.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and outcomes of patients with plaque features of positive remodelling (PR) on their computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTCA) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were referred for CTCA from June 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients underwent prospective, gated 128-slice dual-source CTCA. Patients with PR were compared to those without PR for demographics and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 861 patients were included in our study; 241 (28%) had PR, and 620 (72%) had no PR. Patients with PR were older (PR: 63.9±11.0 years vs no PR: 62.1±11.2 years; p=0.04), more likely to be male (PR: 65.6% vs no PR: 55.8%; p=0.01) and underwent coronary angiography more frequently (PR: 25.7% vs no PR: 14.4%; p<0.01). There were also significant increases in subsequent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events (PR: 2.5% vs no PR: 0.0%; p<0.01) and the need for revascularisation therapy (PR: 15.4% vs no PR: 7.8%; p<0.01) in patients with PR despite being on statins (not a high dose). There was no difference in all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Detection of PR on CTCA is a reliable prognostic indicator of future cardiovascular events and presents a valuable opportunity for initiation of aggressive primary prevention therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72310,"journal":{"name":"AsiaIntervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706778/pdf/AIJ-D-21-00045_Hu.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AsiaIntervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/AIJ-D-21-00045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) due to atherosclerosis is projected to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide until 2040. CAD affects approximately 2.6 million people in the United Kingdom (UK), and 1 in 4 of them do not experience any symptoms.

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and outcomes of patients with plaque features of positive remodelling (PR) on their computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTCA) images.

Methods: Patients who were referred for CTCA from June 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients underwent prospective, gated 128-slice dual-source CTCA. Patients with PR were compared to those without PR for demographics and outcomes.

Results: A total of 861 patients were included in our study; 241 (28%) had PR, and 620 (72%) had no PR. Patients with PR were older (PR: 63.9±11.0 years vs no PR: 62.1±11.2 years; p=0.04), more likely to be male (PR: 65.6% vs no PR: 55.8%; p=0.01) and underwent coronary angiography more frequently (PR: 25.7% vs no PR: 14.4%; p<0.01). There were also significant increases in subsequent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events (PR: 2.5% vs no PR: 0.0%; p<0.01) and the need for revascularisation therapy (PR: 15.4% vs no PR: 7.8%; p<0.01) in patients with PR despite being on statins (not a high dose). There was no difference in all-cause mortality.

Conclusions: Detection of PR on CTCA is a reliable prognostic indicator of future cardiovascular events and presents a valuable opportunity for initiation of aggressive primary prevention therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层冠状动脉造影显示冠状动脉阳性重构:一项观察性研究。
背景:预计到2040年,由动脉粥样硬化引起的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)将成为全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。在英国,CAD影响了大约260万人,其中四分之一的人没有任何症状。目的:本研究的目的是评估ct冠状动脉造影(CTCA)图像上具有阳性重构(PR)斑块特征的患者的特征和预后。方法:回顾性分析2018年6月至2020年1月转诊的CTCA患者。患者接受前瞻性、门控128层双源CTCA。将有PR的患者与没有PR的患者进行人口统计学和结果的比较。结果:共纳入861例患者;有PR者241例(28%),无PR者620例(72%)。有PR者年龄较大(PR: 63.9±11.0岁vs无PR: 62.1±11.2岁;p=0.04),更有可能是男性(PR: 65.6% vs无PR: 55.8%;p=0.01),接受冠状动脉造影的频率更高(PR: 25.7% vs无PR: 14.4%;结论:在CTCA上检测PR是未来心血管事件的可靠预后指标,为开始积极的一级预防治疗提供了宝贵的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A hospital lipid-lowering protocol improves 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Accuracy of machine learning in predicting outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review. Clinical safety and performance of the world's thinnest-strut Evermine50 everolimus-eluting stent: a 24-month follow-up of the Evermine 50 EES - 1 study. First-in-human novel pacing-over-the-wire technique during TAVR with the SENTINEL cerebral protection device: the SENTIPACE pilot study. Hybrid strategy of drug-eluting stent and drug-coated balloon in the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease: 1-year clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1