Influence of Apical Diameter on Filling Material Extrusion during Retreatment - A Micro-CT and CBCT evaluation.

Q2 Medicine Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202204961
Thamires Campos Gomes, Jessica de Almeida Coelho, Lucas Rodrigues Pinheiro, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, Patrícia de Almeida Rodrigues
{"title":"Influence of Apical Diameter on Filling Material Extrusion during Retreatment - A Micro-CT and CBCT evaluation.","authors":"Thamires Campos Gomes,&nbsp;Jessica de Almeida Coelho,&nbsp;Lucas Rodrigues Pinheiro,&nbsp;Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte,&nbsp;Patrícia de Almeida Rodrigues","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202204961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether foraminal widening performed at primary treatment has an effect on the amount of apically extruded obturator material during retreatment and to evaluate the sensitivity of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting extruded obturator material.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty palatal roots of maxillary molars were selected based on micro-CT and divided into two groups (n=20): with foraminal widening (WE) and without foraminal widening (NE). To standardize the apical foramen, all specimens were instrumented to the foramen using the Protaper Next system, up to instrument X3. The WE group was instrumented to the foramen up to instrument X5, and the NE group was instrumented 1 mm lower. The canals were obturated 1 mm below the apical foramen with gutta-percha and AH Plus and stored for 7 days at 37 °C and 95% humidity. Roots were fixed in microtubes filled with 1.5% agar gel. The obturation material was removed with Reciproc R50. Scans of the teeth and agar were performed using micro-CT and CBCT. Comparison between groups and between methods was performed using Mann-Withney test (p ≤0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was found when comparing the extruded material between groups using micro-CT (p = 0.589) or CBCT (p = 0.953). CBCT measured a greater volume of extruded material than micro- CT (p = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Foraminal widening had no effect on the extrusion of filling material during retreatment. The CBCT favored the evaluation of apically extruded filling material.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"33 6","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733367/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To investigate whether foraminal widening performed at primary treatment has an effect on the amount of apically extruded obturator material during retreatment and to evaluate the sensitivity of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting extruded obturator material.

Methods: Forty palatal roots of maxillary molars were selected based on micro-CT and divided into two groups (n=20): with foraminal widening (WE) and without foraminal widening (NE). To standardize the apical foramen, all specimens were instrumented to the foramen using the Protaper Next system, up to instrument X3. The WE group was instrumented to the foramen up to instrument X5, and the NE group was instrumented 1 mm lower. The canals were obturated 1 mm below the apical foramen with gutta-percha and AH Plus and stored for 7 days at 37 °C and 95% humidity. Roots were fixed in microtubes filled with 1.5% agar gel. The obturation material was removed with Reciproc R50. Scans of the teeth and agar were performed using micro-CT and CBCT. Comparison between groups and between methods was performed using Mann-Withney test (p ≤0.05).

Results: No statistical difference was found when comparing the extruded material between groups using micro-CT (p = 0.589) or CBCT (p = 0.953). CBCT measured a greater volume of extruded material than micro- CT (p = 0.0004).

Conclusion: Foraminal widening had no effect on the extrusion of filling material during retreatment. The CBCT favored the evaluation of apically extruded filling material.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根尖直径对再处理过程中填充材料挤压的影响——Micro-CT和CBCT评价。
目的:探讨初次治疗时椎间孔扩宽是否会影响再治疗时根尖闭塞物的数量,并评价锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检测闭塞物的敏感性。方法:采用显微ct技术选择上颌磨牙腭根40根,分为牙间孔扩宽组(WE)和牙间孔扩宽组(NE)两组(n=20)。为了使根尖孔标准化,所有标本都使用Protaper Next系统固定到根尖孔,直至仪器X3。WE组内固定至椎间孔X5处,NE组内固定至椎间孔下方1mm处。在根尖孔以下1mm处用杜胶和AH Plus封闭根管,在37℃、95%湿度下保存7天。根固定在填充1.5%琼脂凝胶的微管中。用Reciproc R50去除封闭材料。使用micro-CT和CBCT对牙齿和琼脂进行扫描。各组间及方法间比较采用Mann-Withney检验(p≤0.05)。结果:micro-CT组与CBCT组对挤压后的材料进行比较,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.589);CBCT比micro- CT测量了更大的挤压材料体积(p = 0.0004)。结论:孔间扩宽对再治疗时充填材料的挤压无影响。CBCT有利于评价根尖挤压充填材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Can a dentin bonding agent prevent color change in regenerative endodontic procedures? An in vitro evaluation Antibacterial ability of different activated irrigation after root canal preparation: intratubular analyses Inhibition of incipient caries lesion progression by different fluoridated varnishes A new hydroxyapatite-alginate-gelatin biocomposite favor bone regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial defect model Prevalence of lectures about dental esthetics and female speakers in three Brazilian conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1