Influence of surface treatment and ageing on the bond strength of resin cement to hybrid and glass-ceramic CAD/CAM materials.

Q3 Medicine Primary dental journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1177/20501684221133274
Juliana Pucci, Mayara Zaghi Dal Picolo, Laila Brasil, Marcelo Giannini, Vanessa Cavalli
{"title":"Influence of surface treatment and ageing on the bond strength of resin cement to hybrid and glass-ceramic CAD/CAM materials.","authors":"Juliana Pucci,&nbsp;Mayara Zaghi Dal Picolo,&nbsp;Laila Brasil,&nbsp;Marcelo Giannini,&nbsp;Vanessa Cavalli","doi":"10.1177/20501684221133274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The influence of different surface treatments and ageing on the shear bond strength (SBS) of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials is still contentious. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of surface treatments and ageing on the SBS of resin cement to polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) CAD/CAM materials. Specimens of PICN (n=10) and ZLS (n=10) were submitted to four surface treatment groups: 1) 5% hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) + silanisation (SI); 2) Air abrasion (AB)+HF+SI; 3) HF + universal adhesive (UA); 4) AB+HF+SI+UA. The treated specimens were bonded with resin cement cylinders and tested in SBS after 24 h and one year of water storage. Data were assessed by \"analysis of variance\" (ANOVA) and Tukey test (α=0.05) and failure modes were classified. No significant differences were observed among treatments at each evaluation time (p>0.05). SBS decreased after one year of storage, except for PICN treated with HF+UA (p=0.068). Air-abraded groups displayed a lower SBS reduction for ZLS. PICN and ZLS exhibited predominantly adhesive and mixed failures, but at one year, PICN cohesive failures increased. In conclusion, HF+UA is an effective surface treatment for PICN, while the combination AB+HF+SI+UA was more appropriate for ZLS. The water storage for one year reduced the SBS for most groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":38334,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental journal","volume":"11 4","pages":"78-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501684221133274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The influence of different surface treatments and ageing on the shear bond strength (SBS) of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials is still contentious. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of surface treatments and ageing on the SBS of resin cement to polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) CAD/CAM materials. Specimens of PICN (n=10) and ZLS (n=10) were submitted to four surface treatment groups: 1) 5% hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) + silanisation (SI); 2) Air abrasion (AB)+HF+SI; 3) HF + universal adhesive (UA); 4) AB+HF+SI+UA. The treated specimens were bonded with resin cement cylinders and tested in SBS after 24 h and one year of water storage. Data were assessed by "analysis of variance" (ANOVA) and Tukey test (α=0.05) and failure modes were classified. No significant differences were observed among treatments at each evaluation time (p>0.05). SBS decreased after one year of storage, except for PICN treated with HF+UA (p=0.068). Air-abraded groups displayed a lower SBS reduction for ZLS. PICN and ZLS exhibited predominantly adhesive and mixed failures, but at one year, PICN cohesive failures increased. In conclusion, HF+UA is an effective surface treatment for PICN, while the combination AB+HF+SI+UA was more appropriate for ZLS. The water storage for one year reduced the SBS for most groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面处理和老化对树脂水泥与杂化和玻璃陶瓷CAD/CAM材料粘结强度的影响
不同的表面处理和老化对计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)材料的剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响仍然存在争议。因此,本研究评估了表面处理和老化对树脂水泥对聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(PICN)和氧化锆增强硅酸锂(ZLS) CAD/CAM材料的SBS的影响。将PICN (n=10)和ZLS (n=10)样品送交4个表面处理组:1)5%氢氟酸蚀刻(HF) +硅化(SI);2)空气磨损(AB)+HF+SI;3) HF +万能胶(UA);4) AB +高频+ SI + UA。处理后的试样与树脂水泥柱粘结,在24 h和1年的水储存后进行SBS测试。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验(α=0.05)对数据进行分析,并对失效模式进行分类。各评价时间处理间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。贮藏1年后,除HF+UA处理的PICN外,SBS呈下降趋势(p=0.068)。空气磨损组对ZLS的SBS降低较低。PICN和ZLS主要表现为粘结破坏和混合破坏,但在1年后,PICN粘结破坏增加。综上所述,HF+UA是一种有效的PICN表面处理方法,而AB+HF+SI+UA组合更适合于ZLS表面处理。1年的储水使大多数组的SBS降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primary dental journal
Primary dental journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive review and update on the current state of computer-assisted rehabilitation in implant dentistry. President's Update. Aesthetic treatment planning simplified using digital smile design: A case report. College News. Dental transpositions: An update for clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1