Is Accurate Lumen Segmentation More Important than Outlet Boundary Condition in Image-Based Blood Flow Simulations for Intracranial Aneurysms?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s13239-023-00675-1
Jana Korte, Samuel Voß, Gábor Janiga, Oliver Beuing, Daniel Behme, Sylvia Saalfeld, Philipp Berg
{"title":"Is Accurate Lumen Segmentation More Important than Outlet Boundary Condition in Image-Based Blood Flow Simulations for Intracranial Aneurysms?","authors":"Jana Korte,&nbsp;Samuel Voß,&nbsp;Gábor Janiga,&nbsp;Oliver Beuing,&nbsp;Daniel Behme,&nbsp;Sylvia Saalfeld,&nbsp;Philipp Berg","doi":"10.1007/s13239-023-00675-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Image-based blood flow simulations are increasingly used to investigate the hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, a strong variability in segmentation approaches as well as the absence of individualized boundary conditions (BCs) influence the quality of these simulation results leading to imprecision and decreased reliability. This study aims to analyze these influences on relevant hemodynamic parameters within IAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a follow-up study of an international multiple aneurysms challenge, the segmentation results of five IAs differing in size and location were investigated. Specifically, five possible outlet BCs were considered in each of the IAs. These are comprised of the zero-pressure condition (BC1), a flow distribution based on Murray's law with the exponents n = 2 (BC2) and n = 3 (BC3) as well as two advanced flow-splitting models considering the real vessels by including circular cross sections (BC4) or anatomical cross sections (BC5), respectively. In total, 120 time-dependent blood flow simulations were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, focusing on five representative intra-aneurysmal flow and five shear parameters such as vorticity and wall shear stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outlet BC variation revealed substantial differences. Higher shear stresses (up to Δ9.69 Pa), intrasaccular velocities (up to Δ0.15 m/s) and vorticities (up to Δ629.22 1/s) were detected when advanced flow-splitting was applied compared to the widely used zero-pressure BC. The tendency of outlets BCs to over- or underestimate hemodynamic parameters is consistent across different segmentations of a single aneurysm model. Segmentation-induced variability reaches Δ19.58 Pa, Δ0.42 m/s and Δ957.27 1/s, respectively. Excluding low fidelity segmentations, however, (a) reduces the deviation drastically (>43%) and (b) leads to a lower impact of the outlet BC on hemodynamic predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a more realistic lumen segmentation, the influence of the BC on the resulting hemodynamics is decreased. A realistic lumen segmentation can be ensured, e.g., by using high-resolved 2D images. Furthermore, the selection of an advanced outflow-splitting model is advised and the use of a zero-pressure BC and BC based on Murray's law with exponent n = 3 should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":54322,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"617-630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-023-00675-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Image-based blood flow simulations are increasingly used to investigate the hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, a strong variability in segmentation approaches as well as the absence of individualized boundary conditions (BCs) influence the quality of these simulation results leading to imprecision and decreased reliability. This study aims to analyze these influences on relevant hemodynamic parameters within IAs.

Methods: As a follow-up study of an international multiple aneurysms challenge, the segmentation results of five IAs differing in size and location were investigated. Specifically, five possible outlet BCs were considered in each of the IAs. These are comprised of the zero-pressure condition (BC1), a flow distribution based on Murray's law with the exponents n = 2 (BC2) and n = 3 (BC3) as well as two advanced flow-splitting models considering the real vessels by including circular cross sections (BC4) or anatomical cross sections (BC5), respectively. In total, 120 time-dependent blood flow simulations were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, focusing on five representative intra-aneurysmal flow and five shear parameters such as vorticity and wall shear stress.

Results: The outlet BC variation revealed substantial differences. Higher shear stresses (up to Δ9.69 Pa), intrasaccular velocities (up to Δ0.15 m/s) and vorticities (up to Δ629.22 1/s) were detected when advanced flow-splitting was applied compared to the widely used zero-pressure BC. The tendency of outlets BCs to over- or underestimate hemodynamic parameters is consistent across different segmentations of a single aneurysm model. Segmentation-induced variability reaches Δ19.58 Pa, Δ0.42 m/s and Δ957.27 1/s, respectively. Excluding low fidelity segmentations, however, (a) reduces the deviation drastically (>43%) and (b) leads to a lower impact of the outlet BC on hemodynamic predictions.

Conclusion: With a more realistic lumen segmentation, the influence of the BC on the resulting hemodynamics is decreased. A realistic lumen segmentation can be ensured, e.g., by using high-resolved 2D images. Furthermore, the selection of an advanced outflow-splitting model is advised and the use of a zero-pressure BC and BC based on Murray's law with exponent n = 3 should be avoided.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在基于图像的颅内动脉瘤血流模拟中,准确的管腔分割比出口边界条件更重要吗?
目的:基于图像的血流模拟越来越多地用于研究颅内动脉瘤(IAs)的血液动力学。然而,分割方法的强可变性以及个性化边界条件(BCs)的缺乏影响了这些模拟结果的质量,导致不精确和可靠性降低。本研究旨在分析这些对IAs内相关血液动力学参数的影响。方法:作为一项国际多发性动脉瘤挑战的后续研究,研究了五个不同大小和位置的IAs的分割结果。具体而言,在每个IA中考虑了五个可能的出口BC。这些包括零压力条件(BC1),这是一种基于Murray定律的流量分布,指数为n = 2(BC2)和n = 3(BC3)以及通过分别包括圆形截面(BC4)或解剖截面(BC5)来考虑真实血管的两个高级分流模型。总共对120个与时间相关的血流模拟进行了定性和定量分析,重点分析了五个具有代表性的动脉瘤内血流和五个剪切参数,如涡度和壁剪切应力。结果:出口BC变异有显著性差异。与广泛使用的零压力BC相比,当应用先进的分流时,检测到更高的剪切应力(高达Δ9.69 Pa)、堆积内速度(高达△0.15 m/s)和涡流(高达δ629.22 1/s)。出口BCs过度或低估血液动力学参数的趋势在单个动脉瘤模型的不同分段中是一致的。分段诱导变异性分别达到Δ19.58 Pa、Δ0.42 m/s和Δ957.27 1/s。然而,排除低保真度分割,(a)显著降低了偏差(>43%),(b)降低了出口BC对血液动力学预测的影响。结论:通过更真实的管腔分割,可以减少BC对血流动力学的影响。可以例如通过使用高分辨率2D图像来确保真实的管腔分割。此外,建议选择先进的流出分流模型,并使用零压力BC和基于指数为n的Murray定律的BC = 应避免使用3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology is a journal publishing the spectrum of basic to translational research in all aspects of cardiovascular physiology and medical treatment. It is the forum for academic and industrial investigators to disseminate research that utilizes engineering principles and methods to advance fundamental knowledge and technological solutions related to the cardiovascular system. Manuscripts spanning from subcellular to systems level topics are invited, including but not limited to implantable medical devices, hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics, functional imaging, surgical devices, electrophysiology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, diagnostic instruments, transport and delivery of biologics, and sensors. In addition to manuscripts describing the original publication of research, manuscripts reviewing developments in these topics or their state-of-art are also invited.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Inter-Patient, Intra-Patient, and Patient-Specific Based Training in Deep Learning for Classification of Heartbeat Arrhythmia. Automated Coronary Artery Segmentation with 3D PSPNET using Global Processing and Patch Based Methods on CCTA Images. The Impact of Peripheral Vascular Motion on Acute Drug Retention of Intravascular Devices. Performance Comparison of Centered and Tilted Blunt and Lighthouse Tip Cannulae for Drainage in Extracorporeal Life Support. A Novel Transcatheter Device to Treat Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis: An Ex Vivo Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1