A combination of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis from primary lymphoma.
{"title":"A combination of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis from primary lymphoma.","authors":"Naxiang Liu, Yijie Chen, Yaoqin Wang, Weiqin Huang, Lili Zhan, Zhongshi Du, Zhaoming Zhong, Zhougui Wu, Youhong Shen, Xiaohong Deng, Shixiong Ni, Lina Tang","doi":"10.3233/CH-231876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To present a method combining ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for differential diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis (CTL) and primary lymphoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 155 patients with CTL (n = 49) and lymphoma (n = 106) who underwent US and CEUS were retrospectively included. The features extracted from US and CEUS and the significant clinical data were created three models using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of the models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined model outperformed US model and CEUS model in distinguish CTL from lymphoma achieved favorable performances in training set and validation set with AUCs of 0.958 and 0.946 as well as high accuracies (91.7% and 87.2%), sensitivities (95.9% and 84.4%) and specificities (82.4% and 93.3%). Delong's test showed that among the three models, combined model was significantly different from the other two models in training set (p = 0.011 and 0.029, respectively) and validation set (p = 0.018 and 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of US and CEUS achieved good diagnostic performance in differentiating lymphoma and CTL, which might aid in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10425,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-231876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To present a method combining ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for differential diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis (CTL) and primary lymphoma.
Methods: A total of 155 patients with CTL (n = 49) and lymphoma (n = 106) who underwent US and CEUS were retrospectively included. The features extracted from US and CEUS and the significant clinical data were created three models using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of the models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC).
Results: The combined model outperformed US model and CEUS model in distinguish CTL from lymphoma achieved favorable performances in training set and validation set with AUCs of 0.958 and 0.946 as well as high accuracies (91.7% and 87.2%), sensitivities (95.9% and 84.4%) and specificities (82.4% and 93.3%). Delong's test showed that among the three models, combined model was significantly different from the other two models in training set (p = 0.011 and 0.029, respectively) and validation set (p = 0.018 and 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions: A combination of US and CEUS achieved good diagnostic performance in differentiating lymphoma and CTL, which might aid in clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, a peer-reviewed international scientific journal, serves as an aid to understanding the flow properties of blood and the relationship to normal and abnormal physiology. The rapidly expanding science of hemorheology concerns blood, its components and the blood vessels with which blood interacts. It includes perihemorheology, i.e., the rheology of fluid and structures in the perivascular and interstitial spaces as well as the lymphatic system. The clinical aspects include pathogenesis, symptomatology and diagnostic methods, and the fields of prophylaxis and therapy in all branches of medicine and surgery, pharmacology and drug research.
The endeavour of the Editors-in-Chief and publishers of Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation is to bring together contributions from those working in various fields related to blood flow all over the world. The editors of Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation are from those countries in Europe, Asia, Australia and America where appreciable work in clinical hemorheology and microcirculation is being carried out. Each editor takes responsibility to decide on the acceptance of a manuscript. He is required to have the manuscript appraised by two referees and may be one of them himself. The executive editorial office, to which the manuscripts have been submitted, is responsible for rapid handling of the reviewing process.
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation accepts original papers, brief communications, mini-reports and letters to the Editors-in-Chief. Review articles, providing general views and new insights into related subjects, are regularly invited by the Editors-in-Chief. Proceedings of international and national conferences on clinical hemorheology (in original form or as abstracts) complete the range of editorial features.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
