A collaborative approach to develop indicators for quality of care for ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in networks without coronary intervention: A position paper.

Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-220057
Miguel Alejandro Rodríguez-Ramos, Maikel Santos-Medina, Alfredo Dueñas-Herrera, Juan Adolfo Prohías Martínez, Eduardo Rivas-Estany
{"title":"A collaborative approach to develop indicators for quality of care for ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in networks without coronary intervention: A position paper.","authors":"Miguel Alejandro Rodríguez-Ramos, Maikel Santos-Medina, Alfredo Dueñas-Herrera, Juan Adolfo Prohías Martínez, Eduardo Rivas-Estany","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data about performance measures (PM) in patients with ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in low- and middle-income countries is really scarce. One of the reasons is the lack of appropriate measures for these scenarios where coronary intervention is not the standard treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a set of PM and quality markers for patients with STEMI in these countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two investigators systematically reviewed existing guidelines and scientific literature to identify potential PM by referring to documents searched through PubMed from 2010 through 2019, using terms \"Myocardial Infarction\", \"STEMI\", \"quality indicator\", and \"performance measure\". A modified Delphi technique, involving multidisciplinary panel interview, was used. A 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel individually rated each potential indicator on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) during three rounds. All indicators that received a median score ≥4.5, in final round without significant disagreement were included as PM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through the consensus-building process, 84 potential indicators were found, of which 10 were proposed as performance measures and 2 as quality metrics, as follows: Pre-Hospital Electrocardiogram; Patients with reperfusion therapy; Pre-hospital Reperfusion; Ischemic time less than 120 minutes; System delay time less than 90 minutes; In-hospital Mortality; Complete in-hospital Treatment; Complete in-hospital Treatment in patients with Heart Failure; 30 day-Re-admissions; 30 day-mortality; Patients with in-hospital stress test performed; and, Patients included in rehabilitation programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This document provides the official set of PM of attention in ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction of the Cuban Society of Cardiology and Cuban National Group of Cardiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-220057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data about performance measures (PM) in patients with ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in low- and middle-income countries is really scarce. One of the reasons is the lack of appropriate measures for these scenarios where coronary intervention is not the standard treatment.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a set of PM and quality markers for patients with STEMI in these countries.

Methods: Two investigators systematically reviewed existing guidelines and scientific literature to identify potential PM by referring to documents searched through PubMed from 2010 through 2019, using terms "Myocardial Infarction", "STEMI", "quality indicator", and "performance measure". A modified Delphi technique, involving multidisciplinary panel interview, was used. A 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel individually rated each potential indicator on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) during three rounds. All indicators that received a median score ≥4.5, in final round without significant disagreement were included as PM.

Results: Through the consensus-building process, 84 potential indicators were found, of which 10 were proposed as performance measures and 2 as quality metrics, as follows: Pre-Hospital Electrocardiogram; Patients with reperfusion therapy; Pre-hospital Reperfusion; Ischemic time less than 120 minutes; System delay time less than 90 minutes; In-hospital Mortality; Complete in-hospital Treatment; Complete in-hospital Treatment in patients with Heart Failure; 30 day-Re-admissions; 30 day-mortality; Patients with in-hospital stress test performed; and, Patients included in rehabilitation programs.

Conclusion: This document provides the official set of PM of attention in ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction of the Cuban Society of Cardiology and Cuban National Group of Cardiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
在无冠状动脉介入治疗的网络中制定ST段抬高心肌梗死护理质量指标的合作方法:立场文件。
背景:中低收入国家 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的绩效测量(PM)数据非常稀少。原因之一是缺乏针对这些情况的适当措施,因为冠状动脉介入并非标准治疗方法:本研究旨在为这些国家的 STEMI 患者制定一套 PM 和质量指标:两名研究人员系统地审查了现有指南和科学文献,参考从 2010 年到 2019 年在 PubMed 上搜索到的文献,使用 "心肌梗死"、"STEMI"、"质量指标 "和 "绩效衡量 "等术语来识别潜在的 PM。采用了改良的德尔菲技术,包括多学科小组访谈。由 15 名成员组成的多学科专家小组在三轮访谈中分别对每个潜在指标进行评分,评分标准从 1 分(最低)到 5 分(最高)不等。所有在最后一轮中获得中位数分数≥4.5,且无重大分歧的指标均被纳入 PM:结果:通过建立共识的过程,找到了 84 个潜在指标,其中 10 个被提议为绩效衡量指标,2 个被提议为质量衡量指标,具体如下:院前心电图、接受再灌注治疗的患者、院前再灌注、缺血时间少于 120 分钟、系统延迟时间少于 90 分钟、院内死亡率、院内完全治疗、心衰患者院内完全治疗、30 天再入院率、30 天死亡率、接受院内压力测试的患者以及纳入康复计划的患者:本文件提供了古巴心脏病学会和古巴国家心脏病学小组关于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死注意事项的官方标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1