A systematic approach to developing NP-led student health services clinic on a regional university campus.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12835
Leigh B Pate, Robin M Dawson, Joy Deupree, Sheryl M Mitchell, Courtney B Catledge
{"title":"A systematic approach to developing NP-led student health services clinic on a regional university campus.","authors":"Leigh B Pate,&nbsp;Robin M Dawson,&nbsp;Joy Deupree,&nbsp;Sheryl M Mitchell,&nbsp;Courtney B Catledge","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universities are communities with specific health care needs, and rural campuses often do not have access to student health services (SHS).</p><p><strong>Problem: </strong>Lack of basic services can increase health risks for students and the greater community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A theory-informed quality improvement project utilizing an organizational assessment, study survey, and proof-of-concept intervention designed to demonstrate feasibility and acceptability of a SHS clinic.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>An NP-directed influenza immunization clinic was conducted on a small rural college campus in southeastern United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight students received influenza vaccinations, demonstrating to local stakeholders the feasibility and acceptability of SHS for primary preventative services. Ninety-seven percent of these students expressed a high likelihood that they would obtain the vaccine again.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of this study can be used as an exemplar to guide health care initiatives focused on college students in rural communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1227-1231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Universities are communities with specific health care needs, and rural campuses often do not have access to student health services (SHS).

Problem: Lack of basic services can increase health risks for students and the greater community.

Methods: A theory-informed quality improvement project utilizing an organizational assessment, study survey, and proof-of-concept intervention designed to demonstrate feasibility and acceptability of a SHS clinic.

Intervention: An NP-directed influenza immunization clinic was conducted on a small rural college campus in southeastern United States.

Results: Seventy-eight students received influenza vaccinations, demonstrating to local stakeholders the feasibility and acceptability of SHS for primary preventative services. Ninety-seven percent of these students expressed a high likelihood that they would obtain the vaccine again.

Conclusions: Results of this study can be used as an exemplar to guide health care initiatives focused on college students in rural communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种在地区大学校园内发展以np为主导的学生健康服务诊所的系统方法。
背景:大学是具有特定卫生保健需求的社区,而农村校园通常无法获得学生卫生服务(SHS)。问题:缺乏基本服务可能会增加学生和更大社区的健康风险。方法:利用组织评估、研究调查和概念验证干预来证明SHS诊所的可行性和可接受性,以理论为依据的质量改进项目。干预措施:在美国东南部一所小型农村大学校园内开展了一项以np为指导的流感免疫诊所。结果:78名学生接种了流感疫苗,向当地利益相关者展示了SHS作为初级预防服务的可行性和可接受性。其中97%的学生表示他们很有可能再次接种疫苗。结论:本研究结果可作为指导农村社区大学生卫生保健工作的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Enrollment ADN-BSN Programs: A Call to Expand Access to This Innovative Approach to the BSN Clinical Supervision in Improving the Quality of Nursing Care: Empowerment of Medical-Surgical Hospitalization Teams Preterm Infant Care Practice among Nurses in Neonatal Care Units of Selected Hospitals of Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study Self-Management Social Support in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Concept Analysis Stigma towards Chronically Ill Patients among Healthcare Workers Caring for COVID-19 Patients during the Outbreak in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1