A retrospective cohort study of short-stay admissions to the medical intensive care unit: Defining patient characteristics and critical care resource utilization.

Pooja N Pandit, Mark Mallozzi, Rahed Mohammed, Gregory McDonough, Taylor Treacy, Nathaniel Zahustecher, Erika J Yoo
{"title":"A retrospective cohort study of short-stay admissions to the medical intensive care unit: Defining patient characteristics and critical care resource utilization.","authors":"Pooja N Pandit, Mark Mallozzi, Rahed Mohammed, Gregory McDonough, Taylor Treacy, Nathaniel Zahustecher, Erika J Yoo","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_6_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the mortality and utilization outcomes of short-stay intensive care unit (ICU) patients who require <24 h of critical care. We aimed to define characteristics and outcomes of short-stay ICU patients whose need for ICU level-of-care is ≤24 h compared to nonshort-stay patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU at an academic tertiary care center in 2019. Fisher's exact test or Chi-square for descriptive categorical variables, <i>t</i>-test for continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney two-sample test for length of stay (LOS) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 819 patients, 206 (25.2%) were short-stay compared to 613 (74.8%) nonshort-stay. The severity of illness as measured by the Mortality Probability Model-III was significantly lower among short-stay compared to nonshort-stay patients (<i>P</i> = 0.0001). Most short-stay patients were admitted for hemodynamic monitoring not requiring vasoactive medications (77, 37.4%). Thirty-six (17.5%) of the short-stay cohort met Society of Critical Care Medicine's guidelines for ICU admission. Nonfull-ICU LOS, or time spent waiting for transfer out to a non-ICU bed, was similar between the two groups. Hospital mortality was lower among short-stay patients compared to nonshort-stay patients (<i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite their lower illness severity and fewer ICU-level care needs, short-stay patients spend an equally substantial amount of time occupying an ICU bed while waiting for a floor bed as nonshort-stay patients. Further investigation into the factors influencing ICU triage of these subacute patients and contributors to system inefficiencies prohibiting their timely transfer may improve ICU resource allocation, hospital throughput, and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"12 3","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_6_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the mortality and utilization outcomes of short-stay intensive care unit (ICU) patients who require <24 h of critical care. We aimed to define characteristics and outcomes of short-stay ICU patients whose need for ICU level-of-care is ≤24 h compared to nonshort-stay patients.

Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU at an academic tertiary care center in 2019. Fisher's exact test or Chi-square for descriptive categorical variables, t-test for continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney two-sample test for length of stay (LOS) outcomes.

Results: Of 819 patients, 206 (25.2%) were short-stay compared to 613 (74.8%) nonshort-stay. The severity of illness as measured by the Mortality Probability Model-III was significantly lower among short-stay compared to nonshort-stay patients (P = 0.0001). Most short-stay patients were admitted for hemodynamic monitoring not requiring vasoactive medications (77, 37.4%). Thirty-six (17.5%) of the short-stay cohort met Society of Critical Care Medicine's guidelines for ICU admission. Nonfull-ICU LOS, or time spent waiting for transfer out to a non-ICU bed, was similar between the two groups. Hospital mortality was lower among short-stay patients compared to nonshort-stay patients (P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Despite their lower illness severity and fewer ICU-level care needs, short-stay patients spend an equally substantial amount of time occupying an ICU bed while waiting for a floor bed as nonshort-stay patients. Further investigation into the factors influencing ICU triage of these subacute patients and contributors to system inefficiencies prohibiting their timely transfer may improve ICU resource allocation, hospital throughput, and patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学重症监护室短期住院病人的回顾性队列研究:确定患者特征和重症监护资源利用情况。
背景:人们对需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)的短期患者的死亡率和使用情况知之甚少:单中心回顾性队列研究,对象为 2019 年在一家学术性三级医疗中心内科重症监护室住院的患者。对描述性分类变量进行费舍尔精确检验或智方检验,对连续变量进行t检验,对住院时间(LOS)结果进行曼-惠特尼双样本检验:在 819 名患者中,206 人(25.2%)为短期住院,613 人(74.8%)为非短期住院。以死亡率概率模型-III衡量,短期住院患者的病情严重程度明显低于非短期住院患者(P = 0.0001)。大多数短期住院患者入院是为了接受血液动力学监测,不需要血管活性药物(77 人,占 37.4%)。短期住院患者中有 36 人(17.5%)符合重症医学会的重症监护病房入院指南。两组患者的非重症监护室住院时间(即等待转到非重症监护室病床的时间)相似。短期住院患者的住院死亡率低于非短期住院患者(P = 0.01):结论:尽管短期住院病人的病情严重程度较低,对重症监护室护理的需求也较少,但他们与非短期住院病人一样,在等待地面床位的过程中占用重症监护室床位的时间同样长。进一步研究影响ICU分流这些亚急性患者的因素,以及导致患者无法及时转院的系统低效因素,可能会改善ICU的资源分配、医院吞吐量和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
期刊最新文献
Effect of temperature and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral saturation. Prospective observational study to measure the incidence of chest pain and its association with perioperative factors among parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section with subarachnoid blocks. Response to: "Before attributing basilar artery aneurysm and pericardial tamponade to leptospirosis, alternative causes must be ruled out". Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center. Association of obesity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1