Patient and family contributions to improve the diagnostic process through the OurDX electronic health record tool: a mixed method analysis.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015793
Sigall K Bell, Kendall Harcourt, Joe Dong, Catherine DesRoches, Nicholas J Hart, Stephen K Liu, Long Ngo, Eric J Thomas, Fabienne C Bourgeois
{"title":"Patient and family contributions to improve the diagnostic process through the OurDX electronic health record tool: a mixed method analysis.","authors":"Sigall K Bell, Kendall Harcourt, Joe Dong, Catherine DesRoches, Nicholas J Hart, Stephen K Liu, Long Ngo, Eric J Thomas, Fabienne C Bourgeois","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and timely diagnosis relies on sharing perspectives among team members and avoiding information asymmetries. Patients/Families hold unique diagnostic process (DxP) information, including knowledge of diagnostic safety blindspots-information that patients/families know, but may be invisible to clinicians. To improve information sharing, we co-developed with patients/families an online tool called 'Our Diagnosis (OurDX)'. We aimed to characterise patient/family contributions in OurDX and how they differed between individuals with and without diagnostic concerns.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We implemented OurDX in two academic organisations serving patients/families living with chronic conditions in three subspecialty clinics and one primary care clinic. Prior to each visit, patients/families were invited to contribute visit priorities, recent histories and potential diagnostic concerns. Responses were available in the electronic health record and could be incorporated by clinicians into visit notes. We randomly sampled OurDX reports with and without diagnostic concerns for chart review and used inductive and deductive qualitative analysis to assess patient/family contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7075 (39%) OurDX reports were submitted at 18 129 paediatric subspecialty clinic visits and 460 (65%) reports were submitted among 706 eligible adult primary care visits. Qualitative analysis of OurDX reports in the chart review sample (n=450) revealed that participants contributed DxP information across 10 categories, most commonly: clinical symptoms/medical history (82%), tests/referrals (54%) and diagnosis/next steps (51%). Participants with diagnostic concerns were more likely to contribute information on DxP risks including access barriers, recent visits for the same problem, problems with tests/referrals or care coordination and communication breakdowns, some of which may represent diagnostic blindspots.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Partnering with patients and families living with chronic conditions through OurDX may help clinicians gain a broader perspective of the DxP, including unique information to coproduce diagnostic safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"597-608"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10879445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015793","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate and timely diagnosis relies on sharing perspectives among team members and avoiding information asymmetries. Patients/Families hold unique diagnostic process (DxP) information, including knowledge of diagnostic safety blindspots-information that patients/families know, but may be invisible to clinicians. To improve information sharing, we co-developed with patients/families an online tool called 'Our Diagnosis (OurDX)'. We aimed to characterise patient/family contributions in OurDX and how they differed between individuals with and without diagnostic concerns.

Method: We implemented OurDX in two academic organisations serving patients/families living with chronic conditions in three subspecialty clinics and one primary care clinic. Prior to each visit, patients/families were invited to contribute visit priorities, recent histories and potential diagnostic concerns. Responses were available in the electronic health record and could be incorporated by clinicians into visit notes. We randomly sampled OurDX reports with and without diagnostic concerns for chart review and used inductive and deductive qualitative analysis to assess patient/family contributions.

Results: 7075 (39%) OurDX reports were submitted at 18 129 paediatric subspecialty clinic visits and 460 (65%) reports were submitted among 706 eligible adult primary care visits. Qualitative analysis of OurDX reports in the chart review sample (n=450) revealed that participants contributed DxP information across 10 categories, most commonly: clinical symptoms/medical history (82%), tests/referrals (54%) and diagnosis/next steps (51%). Participants with diagnostic concerns were more likely to contribute information on DxP risks including access barriers, recent visits for the same problem, problems with tests/referrals or care coordination and communication breakdowns, some of which may represent diagnostic blindspots.

Conclusion: Partnering with patients and families living with chronic conditions through OurDX may help clinicians gain a broader perspective of the DxP, including unique information to coproduce diagnostic safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 OurDX 电子健康记录工具改进诊断过程的患者和家属贡献:混合方法分析。
背景:准确及时的诊断有赖于团队成员之间分享观点,避免信息不对称。患者/家属掌握着独特的诊断过程(DxP)信息,包括诊断安全盲点的知识--患者/家属知道,但临床医生可能看不到的信息。为了改善信息共享,我们与患者/家属共同开发了一款名为 "我们的诊断(OurDX)"的在线工具。我们的目标是了解患者/家属在 OurDX 中的贡献,以及有诊断问题和没有诊断问题的患者/家属的贡献有何不同:我们在两个学术机构的三个亚专科诊所和一个初级保健诊所实施了 OurDX,为慢性病患者/家属提供服务。每次就诊前,我们都会邀请患者/家属提供就诊重点、近期病史和潜在的诊断问题。患者/家属的回答可在电子健康记录中查看,临床医生可将其纳入就诊记录中。我们随机抽取了有诊断问题和无诊断问题的 OurDX 报告进行病历审查,并使用归纳和演绎定性分析来评估患者/家属的贡献:在 18 129 个儿科亚专科门诊中提交了 7075 份(39%)OurDX 报告,在 706 个符合条件的成人初级保健门诊中提交了 460 份(65%)报告。对病历审查样本(n=450)中的 OurDX 报告进行的定性分析显示,参与者提供了 10 个类别的 DxP 信息,其中最常见的是:临床症状/病史(82%)、检查/转诊(54%)和诊断/下一步措施(51%)。有诊断顾虑的参与者更有可能提供有关 DxP 风险的信息,包括就医障碍、最近因同一问题就诊、检查/转诊或护理协调问题以及沟通障碍,其中一些可能是诊断盲点:结论:通过 OurDX 与慢性病患者及家属合作,可帮助临床医生从更广阔的视角来看待 DxP,包括提供独特的信息来共同确保诊断安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
期刊最新文献
What do clinical practice guidelines say about deprescribing? A scoping review. Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing a patient-led escalation system: a qualitative study. Assessing patient work system factors for medication management during transition of care among older adults: an observational study. Sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll: the only reasons for regulators to target individuals. Patient-activated escalation in hospital: patients and their families are ready!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1