The Clinical Trials Assistance Pilot: reducing the financial burden of cancer clinical trials for patients in regional New South Wales.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1071/AH22249
Pareoranga Luiten-Apirana, Monica Gendi, Jai Bernard, Zhicheng Li, Rhiannon Edge, Bradley Gellert, Annie Miller, Maria Mury, Niki Sansey, Lindsey Jasicki, Sean Stolp
{"title":"The Clinical Trials Assistance Pilot: reducing the financial burden of cancer clinical trials for patients in regional New South Wales.","authors":"Pareoranga Luiten-Apirana,&nbsp;Monica Gendi,&nbsp;Jai Bernard,&nbsp;Zhicheng Li,&nbsp;Rhiannon Edge,&nbsp;Bradley Gellert,&nbsp;Annie Miller,&nbsp;Maria Mury,&nbsp;Niki Sansey,&nbsp;Lindsey Jasicki,&nbsp;Sean Stolp","doi":"10.1071/AH22249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study investigated whether the provision of financial assistance to patients living in regional New South Wales influenced patients' decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial (cancer treatment or supportive care) and resulted in improved psychosocial outcomes. Methods Administrative data were collected from participants, including demographics, travel distances and the value of financial support provided. Qualitative interviews were then conducted with a subset of consenting patients who received financial assistance for a clinical trial. Results Sixty-four patients with cancer received financial support for a clinical trial, 27 (42%) of whom were interviewed. Participants whose distance to a trial site was over 400 km received almost three times as much financial support (M  = A$3194.20, s.d. = A$1597.60) as participants whose distance to a trial site was between 50 and 100 km (M  = A$1116.29, s.d. = $A1311.23). Half of participants indicated that receiving financial assistance influenced their decision to participate in a clinical trial, and most indicated the support alleviated the financial burden of clinical trial participation. Conclusions The provision of financial assistance to patients living in regional areas may reduce inequities in cancer clinical trial participation and improve psychosocial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":" ","pages":"607-613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study investigated whether the provision of financial assistance to patients living in regional New South Wales influenced patients' decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial (cancer treatment or supportive care) and resulted in improved psychosocial outcomes. Methods Administrative data were collected from participants, including demographics, travel distances and the value of financial support provided. Qualitative interviews were then conducted with a subset of consenting patients who received financial assistance for a clinical trial. Results Sixty-four patients with cancer received financial support for a clinical trial, 27 (42%) of whom were interviewed. Participants whose distance to a trial site was over 400 km received almost three times as much financial support (M  = A$3194.20, s.d. = A$1597.60) as participants whose distance to a trial site was between 50 and 100 km (M  = A$1116.29, s.d. = $A1311.23). Half of participants indicated that receiving financial assistance influenced their decision to participate in a clinical trial, and most indicated the support alleviated the financial burden of clinical trial participation. Conclusions The provision of financial assistance to patients living in regional areas may reduce inequities in cancer clinical trial participation and improve psychosocial outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床试验援助试点:减轻癌症临床试验对新南威尔士州患者的财政负担。
目的本研究调查向生活在新南威尔士州地区的患者提供经济援助是否影响患者参与癌症临床试验(癌症治疗或支持性护理)的决定,并导致心理社会结果的改善。方法收集参与者的行政数据,包括人口统计、旅行距离和所提供的财政支持的价值。然后对接受临床试验经济援助的同意患者进行定性访谈。结果64名癌症患者接受了临床试验的经济支持,其中27人(42%)接受了访谈。到试验地点的距离超过400的参与者 km获得了几乎三倍的财政支持(M = 3194.20澳元,s.d。 = 1597.60澳元)作为与试验地点距离在50至100之间的参与者 公里(M = 1116.29澳元,s.d。 = $A1311.23)。一半的参与者表示,接受经济援助会影响他们参加临床试验的决定,大多数人表示,这种支持减轻了参与临床试验的经济负担。结论向居住在地区的患者提供经济援助可以减少癌症临床试验参与的不公平现象,改善心理社会结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1