Hava Kuçuk , David Laville , Pierre Dal-Col , Violaine Yvorel , Abdulrazzak Sulaiman , Sophie Bayle-Bleuez , Philippe Cosmo , Jean-Michel Vergnon , Olivier Tiffet , Anne-Laure Desage , Fabien Forest
{"title":"Value of immunohistochemistry in crushed areas of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma","authors":"Hava Kuçuk , David Laville , Pierre Dal-Col , Violaine Yvorel , Abdulrazzak Sulaiman , Sophie Bayle-Bleuez , Philippe Cosmo , Jean-Michel Vergnon , Olivier Tiffet , Anne-Laure Desage , Fabien Forest","doi":"10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Immunohistochemical demonstration of neuroendocrine differentiation is often performed in routine diagnostic practice for lung </span>neuroendocrine carcinoma<span><span><span>. However, these carcinomas are often crushed, especially on small specimens. The value of immunohistochemistry on crushed areas is not known. We aimed to assess the value of immunohistochemical markers in crushed areas. We performed a retrospective study of 299 patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma. We showed that the markers TTF-1, </span>synaptophysin, </span>chromogranin A, CD56, and INSM1 were more often negative in crushed areas compared with well-preserved areas. The proliferation index with anti-Ki67 was decreased but remained on average around 90%. For all markers, the percentage of labeled cells was lower than in the preserved areas. Finally, we show that cases without labeling in the crushed areas and maintained labeling in the non-crushed areas have a lower percentage of labeling than cases without this labeling mismatch. Finally, there were no false positives of these stains.</span></p><p>Neuroendocrine markers are valid in crushed areas when positive. However, the percentage of labeled cells may be lower than on preserved areas and lead to false negatives. Finally, the proliferation index, although decreased, remains close to that on preserved areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12176,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and molecular pathology","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and molecular pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014480022000995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Immunohistochemical demonstration of neuroendocrine differentiation is often performed in routine diagnostic practice for lung neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, these carcinomas are often crushed, especially on small specimens. The value of immunohistochemistry on crushed areas is not known. We aimed to assess the value of immunohistochemical markers in crushed areas. We performed a retrospective study of 299 patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma. We showed that the markers TTF-1, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CD56, and INSM1 were more often negative in crushed areas compared with well-preserved areas. The proliferation index with anti-Ki67 was decreased but remained on average around 90%. For all markers, the percentage of labeled cells was lower than in the preserved areas. Finally, we show that cases without labeling in the crushed areas and maintained labeling in the non-crushed areas have a lower percentage of labeling than cases without this labeling mismatch. Finally, there were no false positives of these stains.
Neuroendocrine markers are valid in crushed areas when positive. However, the percentage of labeled cells may be lower than on preserved areas and lead to false negatives. Finally, the proliferation index, although decreased, remains close to that on preserved areas.
期刊介绍:
Under new editorial leadership, Experimental and Molecular Pathology presents original articles on disease processes in relation to structural and biochemical alterations in mammalian tissues and fluids and on the application of newer techniques of molecular biology to problems of pathology in humans and other animals. The journal also publishes selected interpretive synthesis reviews by bench level investigators working at the "cutting edge" of contemporary research in pathology. In addition, special thematic issues present original research reports that unravel some of Nature''s most jealously guarded secrets on the pathologic basis of disease.
Research Areas include: Stem cells; Neoangiogenesis; Molecular diagnostics; Polymerase chain reaction; In situ hybridization; DNA sequencing; Cell receptors; Carcinogenesis; Pathobiology of neoplasia; Complex infectious diseases; Transplantation; Cytokines; Flow cytomeric analysis; Inflammation; Cellular injury; Immunology and hypersensitivity; Athersclerosis.