Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1177/10225536221137753
Feng Zhu, Xin Qiu, Shunan Liu, Kenneth Man-Chee Cheung
{"title":"Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.","authors":"Feng Zhu,&nbsp;Xin Qiu,&nbsp;Shunan Liu,&nbsp;Kenneth Man-Chee Cheung","doi":"10.1177/10225536221137753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Over the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%-69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%-79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%-78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%-13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%-49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months' follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%-10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times.</p>","PeriodicalId":48794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"30 3","pages":"10225536221137753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221137753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0.

Results: Twenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%-69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%-79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%-78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%-13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%-49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months' follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%-10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries.

Conclusions: The current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎体系留治疗脊柱侧凸至少3年的经验:一项系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析。
目的:近12年来,椎体系固术(VBT)治疗脊柱侧凸逐渐得到推广,但相关研究较少,且随访时间较短。本研究旨在系统评价VBT治疗脊柱侧凸的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆截至2021年11月发表的关于VBT治疗脊柱侧凸的研究。两名研究人员独立筛选文献,提取数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。提取临床疗效、非计划再手术及并发症的数据。采用r4.1.0进行meta分析。结果:meta分析纳入了26项研究,涉及1045例患者。术后即刻主要曲线矫正率为46.6%±13.8%(16% ~ 69%),终期矫正率为53.2%±17.9%(16% ~ 79%)。所有纳入研究的单臂meta分析结果显示,VBT总体上是有效的。临床总成功率为73.02%(95%可信区间[CI]: 68.31% ~ 78.05%)。合并整体非计划再手术率为8.66% (95% CI: 5.53% ~ 13.31%)。总并发症发生率为36.8% (95% CI: 23.9% ~ 49.7%)。基于随访时间的亚组分析显示,随访时间>36个月的患者临床成功率、非计划再手术率、并发症发生率均高于随访时间>36个月的患者。结论:目前各国至少3年随访的证据表明,VBT是治疗脊柱侧凸的有效手术方式,临床成功率为73.88%。然而,约七分之一(15.8%)的患者需要计划外再手术,但只有7.17%的患者需要PSF。约一半(52.17%)的患者出现并发症。由于研究数量和质量的限制,我们的结论可能存在偏倚,需要进一步的研究和更长的随访时间来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Does the use of polymethyl-methacrylate cement after intralesional curettage of giant cell tumors of appendicular bone guarantee reduced local recurrence rates? A retrospective analysis. Letter to the editor regarding "the analgesic effect and safety of duloxetine in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review". Orthopaedic surgery academic productivity - how do we measure up? Therapeutic effect of C-type natriuretic peptide on persistent pain in a rat knee arthritis model. Expression and diagnostic significance of integrin beta-2 in synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1