Unmasking the Twitter Discourses on Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: User Cluster-Based BERT Topic Modeling Approach.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.2196/41198
Weiai Wayne Xu, Jean Marie Tshimula, Ève Dubé, Janice E Graham, Devon Greyson, Noni E MacDonald, Samantha B Meyer
{"title":"Unmasking the Twitter Discourses on Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: User Cluster-Based BERT Topic Modeling Approach.","authors":"Weiai Wayne Xu,&nbsp;Jean Marie Tshimula,&nbsp;Ève Dubé,&nbsp;Janice E Graham,&nbsp;Devon Greyson,&nbsp;Noni E MacDonald,&nbsp;Samantha B Meyer","doi":"10.2196/41198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has spotlighted the politicization of public health issues. A public health monitoring tool must be equipped to reveal a public health measure's political context and guide better interventions. In its current form, infoveillance tends to neglect identity and interest-based users, hence being limited in exposing how public health discourse varies by different political groups. Adopting an algorithmic tool to classify users and their short social media texts might remedy that limitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to implement a new computational framework to investigate discourses and temporal changes in topics unique to different user clusters. The framework was developed to contextualize how web-based public health discourse varies by identity and interest-based user clusters. We used masks and mask wearing during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in the English-speaking world as a case study to illustrate the application of the framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first clustered Twitter users based on their identities and interests as expressed through Twitter bio pages. Exploratory text network analysis reveals salient political, social, and professional identities of various user clusters. It then uses BERT Topic modeling to identify topics by the user clusters. It reveals how web-based discourse has shifted over time and varied by 4 user clusters: conservative, progressive, general public, and public health professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study demonstrated the importance of a priori user classification and longitudinal topical trends in understanding the political context of web-based public health discourse. The framework reveals that the political groups and the general public focused on the science of mask wearing and the partisan politics of mask policies. A populist discourse that pits citizens against elites and institutions was identified in some tweets. Politicians (such as Donald Trump) and geopolitical tensions with China were found to drive the discourse. It also shows limited participation of public health professionals compared with other users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude by discussing the importance of a priori user classification in analyzing web-based discourse and illustrating the fit of BERT Topic modeling in identifying contextualized topics in short social media texts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e41198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749113/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/41198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has spotlighted the politicization of public health issues. A public health monitoring tool must be equipped to reveal a public health measure's political context and guide better interventions. In its current form, infoveillance tends to neglect identity and interest-based users, hence being limited in exposing how public health discourse varies by different political groups. Adopting an algorithmic tool to classify users and their short social media texts might remedy that limitation.

Objective: We aimed to implement a new computational framework to investigate discourses and temporal changes in topics unique to different user clusters. The framework was developed to contextualize how web-based public health discourse varies by identity and interest-based user clusters. We used masks and mask wearing during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in the English-speaking world as a case study to illustrate the application of the framework.

Methods: We first clustered Twitter users based on their identities and interests as expressed through Twitter bio pages. Exploratory text network analysis reveals salient political, social, and professional identities of various user clusters. It then uses BERT Topic modeling to identify topics by the user clusters. It reveals how web-based discourse has shifted over time and varied by 4 user clusters: conservative, progressive, general public, and public health professionals.

Results: This study demonstrated the importance of a priori user classification and longitudinal topical trends in understanding the political context of web-based public health discourse. The framework reveals that the political groups and the general public focused on the science of mask wearing and the partisan politics of mask policies. A populist discourse that pits citizens against elites and institutions was identified in some tweets. Politicians (such as Donald Trump) and geopolitical tensions with China were found to drive the discourse. It also shows limited participation of public health professionals compared with other users.

Conclusions: We conclude by discussing the importance of a priori user classification in analyzing web-based discourse and illustrating the fit of BERT Topic modeling in identifying contextualized topics in short social media texts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间揭开Twitter关于口罩的话语:基于用户集群的BERT主题建模方法。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了公共卫生问题的政治化。必须配备公共卫生监测工具,以揭示公共卫生措施的政治背景,并指导更好的干预措施。以目前的形式,信息监测往往忽视基于身份和兴趣的用户,因此在揭示公共卫生话语如何因不同的政治群体而变化方面受到限制。采用一种算法工具对用户及其简短的社交媒体文本进行分类,可能会弥补这一限制。目的:我们旨在实现一个新的计算框架来研究不同用户群特有的主题的话语和时间变化。开发该框架的目的是将基于网络的公共卫生话语如何因身份和基于兴趣的用户群而变化。我们以英语国家新冠肺炎大流行初期的口罩和口罩佩戴情况为例,说明该框架的应用。方法:我们首先根据Twitter个人主页上的身份和兴趣对Twitter用户进行聚类。探索性文本网络分析揭示了不同用户群的显著政治、社会和职业身份。然后,它使用BERT Topic建模来根据用户集群识别主题。它揭示了基于网络的话语如何随着时间的推移而变化,并根据4个用户群而变化:保守派、进步派、普通公众和公共卫生专业人员。结果:本研究证明了先验用户分类和纵向主题趋势在理解基于网络的公共卫生话语的政治背景中的重要性。该框架表明,政治团体和普通大众关注的是戴口罩的科学和口罩政策的党派政治。在一些推文中,人们发现了一种让公民对抗精英和机构的民粹主义言论。研究发现,政治人物(如唐纳德•特朗普)和与中国的地缘政治紧张关系推动了这种言论。它还显示,与其他用户相比,公共卫生专业人员的参与有限。结论:我们最后讨论了先验用户分类在分析基于网络的话语中的重要性,并说明了BERT主题建模在识别短社交媒体文本中的情境化主题方面的适合性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between X/Twitter and Prescribing Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Ecological Study. Correction: Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter in Japan: Qualitative Analysis of Disrupted Plans and Consequences. The Complex Interaction Between Sleep-Related Information, Misinformation, and Sleep Health: A Call for Comprehensive Research on Sleep Infodemiology and Infoveillance. Understanding and Combating Misinformation: An Evolutionary Perspective. Detection and Characterization of Online Substance Use Discussions Among Gamers: Qualitative Retrospective Analysis of Reddit r/StopGaming Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1