Development and professional validation of an App to support Oral Cancer Screening.

Q2 Medicine Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202204895
Talita Jordânia Rocha do Rêgo, José Vitor Mota Lemos, Amanda Pinheiro Leitão Matos, Caio Ferreira Freire Caetano, Thinali Sousa Dantas, Fabrício Bitu Sousa, Edgar Marçal de Barros Filho, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva
{"title":"Development and professional validation of an App to support Oral Cancer Screening.","authors":"Talita Jordânia Rocha do Rêgo,&nbsp;José Vitor Mota Lemos,&nbsp;Amanda Pinheiro Leitão Matos,&nbsp;Caio Ferreira Freire Caetano,&nbsp;Thinali Sousa Dantas,&nbsp;Fabrício Bitu Sousa,&nbsp;Edgar Marçal de Barros Filho,&nbsp;Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202204895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to develop and validate an App for identifying risk factors for oral cancer. To this end, we developed an App (OCS: Oral Cancer Screening) with predictors of Oral Cancer (OC) and algorithm assembly to estimate the risk of its development.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Simulated clinical cases were designed so that 40 professionals with expertise in oral diagnostics could validate the algorithm and test its usability (SUS: System Usability Score) and acceptability (TAM: Technology Acceptance Model). Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Friedman/Dunn tests, and Spearman correlation evaluated the SUS and TAM scales. ROC curve was plotted to estimate the cutoff point of the algorithm in suggesting a high risk for OCS of the simulated cases. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were additionally used (p<0.05, SPSS v20.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Professionals with expertise in oral diagnosis had usability of 84.63±10.66 and acceptability of 84.75±10.62, which correlated positively (p<0.001, r=0.647). Acting in clinical areas of dentistry (p=0.034) and history of performing OC risk factor orientation (p=0.048) increased acceptability while acting in higher education increased usability (p=0.011). The cutoff point suggested by the App after validation of the simulated clinical cases showed high sensitivity of 84.8% and lower specificity of 58.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OCS was effective and with adequate sensitivity, usability, and acceptability and may contribute to the detection of early oral lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"33 6","pages":"44-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop and validate an App for identifying risk factors for oral cancer. To this end, we developed an App (OCS: Oral Cancer Screening) with predictors of Oral Cancer (OC) and algorithm assembly to estimate the risk of its development.

Methodology: Simulated clinical cases were designed so that 40 professionals with expertise in oral diagnostics could validate the algorithm and test its usability (SUS: System Usability Score) and acceptability (TAM: Technology Acceptance Model). Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Friedman/Dunn tests, and Spearman correlation evaluated the SUS and TAM scales. ROC curve was plotted to estimate the cutoff point of the algorithm in suggesting a high risk for OCS of the simulated cases. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were additionally used (p<0.05, SPSS v20.0).

Results: Professionals with expertise in oral diagnosis had usability of 84.63±10.66 and acceptability of 84.75±10.62, which correlated positively (p<0.001, r=0.647). Acting in clinical areas of dentistry (p=0.034) and history of performing OC risk factor orientation (p=0.048) increased acceptability while acting in higher education increased usability (p=0.011). The cutoff point suggested by the App after validation of the simulated clinical cases showed high sensitivity of 84.8% and lower specificity of 58.4%.

Conclusion: The OCS was effective and with adequate sensitivity, usability, and acceptability and may contribute to the detection of early oral lesions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和专业验证支持口腔癌筛查的应用程序。
本研究的目的是开发和验证用于识别口腔癌危险因素的应用程序。为此,我们开发了一个应用程序(OCS: Oral Cancer Screening),其中包含口腔癌(OC)的预测因子和算法集合,以估计其发展风险。方法:设计了模拟临床病例,以便40名具有口腔诊断专业知识的专业人员验证算法并测试其可用性(SUS:系统可用性评分)和可接受性(TAM:技术接受模型)。Cronbach’s alpha系数、Friedman/Dunn检验和Spearman相关性评估SUS和TAM量表。绘制ROC曲线来估计算法的截止点,表明模拟病例的OCS风险较高。结果:具有口腔诊断专业知识的专业人员可用性为84.63±10.66,可接受性为84.75±10.62,两者呈正相关(p结论:OCS是有效的,具有足够的灵敏度、可用性和可接受性,可能有助于早期发现口腔病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Can a dentin bonding agent prevent color change in regenerative endodontic procedures? An in vitro evaluation Antibacterial ability of different activated irrigation after root canal preparation: intratubular analyses Inhibition of incipient caries lesion progression by different fluoridated varnishes A new hydroxyapatite-alginate-gelatin biocomposite favor bone regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial defect model Prevalence of lectures about dental esthetics and female speakers in three Brazilian conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1