Soft collar for acute cervical spine injury immobilisation -patient experiences and outcomes: A single centre mixed methods study

Fiona L. Jennings , Marion L. Mitchell , James Walsham , David SR. Lockwood , Robert M. Eley
{"title":"Soft collar for acute cervical spine injury immobilisation -patient experiences and outcomes: A single centre mixed methods study","authors":"Fiona L. Jennings ,&nbsp;Marion L. Mitchell ,&nbsp;James Walsham ,&nbsp;David SR. Lockwood ,&nbsp;Robert M. Eley","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cervical collars are used as standard care for neck immobilisation after cervical spine injury. Although evidence for the most effective type of collar is lacking, there is evidence regarding adverse patient outcomes when managed in a semi or rigid collar. In response to the evidence of complications and adverse effects when using a hard collar, a large Australian adult trauma hospital that specializes in spinal care, changed its policy from hard to soft collars when managing acute cervical spine injury.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate patients’ experiences and outcomes when wearing a soft collar for acute cervical spine injury management in hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A single centre mixed method sequential study design was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Medical records from 136 patients were examined and no adverse events resulting from collar use were recorded. Interviews with 20 patients revealed that they understood the value of wearing a soft collar. The soft collars were considered supportive and well tolerated, with good adherence to recommendations for use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Understanding the patients’ experiences informs better care management. This study suggests that soft collars are well tolerated, do not result in pressure injuries or other adverse events and are suitable for managing acute cervical spine injury.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124122000454/pdfft?md5=e0eb8e4ba30d0e62c7a0e937aab41fd6&pid=1-s2.0-S1878124122000454-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124122000454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Cervical collars are used as standard care for neck immobilisation after cervical spine injury. Although evidence for the most effective type of collar is lacking, there is evidence regarding adverse patient outcomes when managed in a semi or rigid collar. In response to the evidence of complications and adverse effects when using a hard collar, a large Australian adult trauma hospital that specializes in spinal care, changed its policy from hard to soft collars when managing acute cervical spine injury.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate patients’ experiences and outcomes when wearing a soft collar for acute cervical spine injury management in hospital.

Method

A single centre mixed method sequential study design was used.

Results

Medical records from 136 patients were examined and no adverse events resulting from collar use were recorded. Interviews with 20 patients revealed that they understood the value of wearing a soft collar. The soft collars were considered supportive and well tolerated, with good adherence to recommendations for use.

Conclusions

Understanding the patients’ experiences informs better care management. This study suggests that soft collars are well tolerated, do not result in pressure injuries or other adverse events and are suitable for managing acute cervical spine injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软领用于急性颈椎损伤固定-患者经验和结果:单中心混合方法研究
颈圈是颈椎损伤后颈部固定的标准护理。虽然缺乏最有效的项圈类型的证据,但有证据表明在半或刚性项圈中管理患者的不良结果。由于有证据表明使用硬颈圈会产生并发症和不良反应,澳大利亚一家专门从事脊柱护理的大型成人创伤医院在处理急性颈椎损伤时,将硬颈圈改为软颈圈。目的探讨医院急性颈椎损伤患者佩戴软领治疗的体会和效果。方法采用单中心混合法序贯研究设计。结果共检查136例患者的病历,无因使用颈圈引起的不良事件记录。对20名患者的采访显示,他们明白戴软领的价值。软项圈被认为是支持性的,耐受性良好,并且很好地遵守了使用建议。结论了解患者的经历有助于更好地进行护理管理。本研究表明软颈圈耐受性良好,不会造成压力损伤或其他不良事件,适用于治疗急性颈椎损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Current status of postoperative care for elderly osteoporotic fracture patients in Jiangsu Province, China: A multicenter cross-sectional study Corrigendum to "The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review" [Int. J. Orthopaed. Trauma Nurs. 53 (2024) 101048]. LITERATURE REVIEWS – The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on bone healing and tissue regeneration Health literacy of older adults with musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1