Incidence and risk factors for postintensive care syndrome in a cohort of critically ill patients.

Q2 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Pub Date : 2022-11-04 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5935/0103-507X.20220224-pt
Julia Tejero-Aranguren, Raimundo García-Del Moral Martin, Maria Eugenia Poyatos-Aguilera, Ildaura Morales-Galindo, Angel Cobos-Vargas, Manuel Colmenero
{"title":"Incidence and risk factors for postintensive care syndrome in a cohort of critically ill patients.","authors":"Julia Tejero-Aranguren, Raimundo García-Del Moral Martin, Maria Eugenia Poyatos-Aguilera, Ildaura Morales-Galindo, Angel Cobos-Vargas, Manuel Colmenero","doi":"10.5935/0103-507X.20220224-pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of postintensive care syndrome in a cohort of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit and to identify risk factors related to its development in the physical, cognitive and mental health areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational cohort study developed in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients with intensive care unit stays equal to or longer than one week and the need for mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days, shock or delirium were included in the study. Demographic variables, reasons for admission, diagnoses, sedation, type of mechanical ventilation used, complications and length of stay were recorded. A univariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors related to postintensive care syndrome. The scales used for the assessment of the different spheres were Barthel, Pfeiffer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale-6. The main variables of interest were postintensive care syndrome incidence overall and by domains. Risk factors were examined in each of the health domains (physical, cognitive and mental health).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven patients were included. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 16.5. The mean number of intensive care unit days was 17. The incidence of global postintensive care syndrome was 56.3% (n = 49, 95%CI 45.8 - 66.2%). The incidence of postintensive care syndrome in each of the spheres was 32.1% (physical), 11.5% (cognitive), and 36.6% (mental health).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of postintensive care syndrome is 56.3%. The mental health sphere is the most frequently involved. The risk factors are different depending on the area considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":53519,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","volume":"34 3","pages":"380-385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220224-pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence of postintensive care syndrome in a cohort of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit and to identify risk factors related to its development in the physical, cognitive and mental health areas.

Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study developed in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients with intensive care unit stays equal to or longer than one week and the need for mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days, shock or delirium were included in the study. Demographic variables, reasons for admission, diagnoses, sedation, type of mechanical ventilation used, complications and length of stay were recorded. A univariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors related to postintensive care syndrome. The scales used for the assessment of the different spheres were Barthel, Pfeiffer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale-6. The main variables of interest were postintensive care syndrome incidence overall and by domains. Risk factors were examined in each of the health domains (physical, cognitive and mental health).

Results: Eighty-seven patients were included. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 16.5. The mean number of intensive care unit days was 17. The incidence of global postintensive care syndrome was 56.3% (n = 49, 95%CI 45.8 - 66.2%). The incidence of postintensive care syndrome in each of the spheres was 32.1% (physical), 11.5% (cognitive), and 36.6% (mental health).

Conclusions: The incidence of postintensive care syndrome is 56.3%. The mental health sphere is the most frequently involved. The risk factors are different depending on the area considered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一组重症患者重症监护后综合征的发病率和风险因素。
目的确定重症监护室收治的重症患者群体中重症监护后综合征的发病率,并从身体、认知和心理健康等方面找出与重症监护后综合征发病相关的风险因素:这是一项在大学医院重症监护室开展的前瞻性队列观察研究。研究对象包括重症监护室住院时间等于或超过一周、需要机械通气超过 3 天、休克或谵妄的患者。研究记录了人口统计学变量、入院原因、诊断、镇静、机械通气类型、并发症和住院时间。研究人员进行了单变量分析,以确定与重症监护后综合征相关的风险因素。用于评估不同领域的量表包括巴特尔量表、费弗尔量表、医院焦虑抑郁量表和事件影响量表-6。研究的主要变量是重症监护后综合征的总体发生率和各领域的发生率。对每个健康领域(身体、认知和心理健康)的风险因素进行了研究:结果:共纳入 87 名患者。急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 的平均得分为 16.5 分。重症监护室的平均天数为 17 天。总体重症监护后综合征的发生率为 56.3%(n = 49,95%CI 45.8 - 66.2%)。各领域重症监护后综合征的发生率分别为32.1%(身体)、11.5%(认知)和36.6%(心理健康):结论:重症监护后综合征的发生率为 56.3%。结论:重症监护后综合征的发病率为 56.3%,其中精神健康领域的发病率最高。不同的领域有不同的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient-level costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in a public intensive care unit in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study Critical COVID-19 and neurological dysfunction - a direct comparative analysis between SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious pathogens. Reply to: Epistaxis as a complication of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in adults. Robust, maintainable, emergency invasive mechanical ventilator. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1