A Novel Method to Suppress the Effect of Subdiaphragmatic Activity in 99mTc Myocardial Perfusion SPECT and Evaluation of Its Usefulness Using a Myocardial Phantom.

Atsushi Komuro, Satomi Teraoka, Yasushi Ishikawa, Masanori Tsuboko, Mika Tanno, Kouichi Ishimori, Kazuo Funaki, Jiro Izumida, Tomiyoshi Saito
{"title":"A Novel Method to Suppress the Effect of Subdiaphragmatic Activity in <sup>99m</sup>Tc Myocardial Perfusion SPECT and Evaluation of Its Usefulness Using a Myocardial Phantom.","authors":"Atsushi Komuro,&nbsp;Satomi Teraoka,&nbsp;Yasushi Ishikawa,&nbsp;Masanori Tsuboko,&nbsp;Mika Tanno,&nbsp;Kouichi Ishimori,&nbsp;Kazuo Funaki,&nbsp;Jiro Izumida,&nbsp;Tomiyoshi Saito","doi":"10.17996/anc.22-00154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Smoothing in <sup>99m</sup>Tc myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) often increases myocardial artifacts due to subdiaphragmatic activity near the heart. To reduce these artifacts, we developed a new process flow, masking on unsmoothed images (MUS), that includes the extraction of the myocardium by masking before smoothing. <i>Methods</i>: This study evaluated the relationships between matrix sizes and distances to the subdiaphragmatic activity using the MUS method compared to conventional methods using a combination of image reconstruction methods (filtered back-projection [FBP] and ordered subset expectation maximization [OSEM]) with or without corrections (attenuation [AC], scatter [SC], and resolution recovery [RR]) using a myocardial phantom. The results were compared for two matrix sizes (pixel sizes) (128×128 [3.3 mm] and 64×64 [6.6 mm]); four subdiaphragmatic activity distances (5, 10, 15, and 20 mm); and three reconstruction methods (FBP without correction; OSEM with RR; and OSEM with AC, SC, and RR). <i>Results</i>: In the conventional method, increasing distance resulted in interference with myocardial perfusion SPECT evaluation however, the artifacts were less apparent when the MUS method was applied. The images converted to 64×64 did not show the same effect as the 128×128 images, even when RR was used. The MUS method was useful for acquisition at 128×128, along with the use of RR in the reconstruction process. <i>Conclusion</i>: MUS mitigated the effects of subdiaphragmatic activity on myocardial perfusion SPECT, particularly combined with 128×128 acquisitions and iterative reconstruction with RR.</p>","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749759/pdf/8_30.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.22-00154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Smoothing in 99mTc myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) often increases myocardial artifacts due to subdiaphragmatic activity near the heart. To reduce these artifacts, we developed a new process flow, masking on unsmoothed images (MUS), that includes the extraction of the myocardium by masking before smoothing. Methods: This study evaluated the relationships between matrix sizes and distances to the subdiaphragmatic activity using the MUS method compared to conventional methods using a combination of image reconstruction methods (filtered back-projection [FBP] and ordered subset expectation maximization [OSEM]) with or without corrections (attenuation [AC], scatter [SC], and resolution recovery [RR]) using a myocardial phantom. The results were compared for two matrix sizes (pixel sizes) (128×128 [3.3 mm] and 64×64 [6.6 mm]); four subdiaphragmatic activity distances (5, 10, 15, and 20 mm); and three reconstruction methods (FBP without correction; OSEM with RR; and OSEM with AC, SC, and RR). Results: In the conventional method, increasing distance resulted in interference with myocardial perfusion SPECT evaluation however, the artifacts were less apparent when the MUS method was applied. The images converted to 64×64 did not show the same effect as the 128×128 images, even when RR was used. The MUS method was useful for acquisition at 128×128, along with the use of RR in the reconstruction process. Conclusion: MUS mitigated the effects of subdiaphragmatic activity on myocardial perfusion SPECT, particularly combined with 128×128 acquisitions and iterative reconstruction with RR.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种抑制99mTc心肌灌注SPECT膈下活动影响的新方法及心肌幻像评价。
背景:99mTc心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的平滑处理通常会增加心肌伪影,因为心脏附近的膈下活动。为了减少这些伪影,我们开发了一种新的处理流程,即对未平滑图像进行掩蔽(MUS),其中包括在平滑之前通过掩蔽提取心肌。方法:本研究使用MUS方法评估了矩阵大小与膈下活动距离之间的关系,并与使用心肌模型的图像重建方法(滤波反投影[FBP]和有序子集期望最大化[OSEM])组合的传统方法进行了比较。比较了两种矩阵尺寸(像素尺寸)(128×128 [3.3 mm]和64×64 [6.6 mm])的结果;四个膈下活动距离(5、10、15和20毫米);三种重建方法(无校正FBP;OSEM与RR;OSEM有AC、SC和RR)。结果:在常规方法中,距离增大会对心肌灌注SPECT评价产生干扰,而采用MUS法时,伪影不明显。转换为64×64的图像没有显示出与128×128图像相同的效果,即使使用了RR。MUS方法用于在128×128获取,以及在重建过程中使用RR。结论:MUS减轻了膈下活动对心肌灌注SPECT的影响,特别是与128×128采集和RR迭代重建相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myocardial Strain Derived from 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography: Detection of Ischemia-Related Wall Motion Abnormality. Phantom-Based Standardization Method for 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio Validated by D-SPECT Versus Anger Camera. Modified Algorithm Using Total Count for Calculating Myocardial Washout Rate in Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography. The Application of Conditional Probability to Harmonize Nuclear Cardiology Test Results. Validation of a Five-Year Prognostic Model Using 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Patients with Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1