Building Equitable Community-Academic Partnerships for Opioid Recovery Research: Lessons Learned from Stakeholder Engagement With Peer and Provider Organizations.

Jon N Gilgoff, Eunsong Park, Julvette Price, Tiffinee Scott, Tyrell Moyd, Katie Rouse, Gabby Knighton, Jodi Frey, Nicole Mattocks, Erika Shook, Michelle Tuten, Jay Unick, Fernando A Wagner
{"title":"Building Equitable Community-Academic Partnerships for Opioid Recovery Research: Lessons Learned from Stakeholder Engagement With Peer and Provider Organizations.","authors":"Jon N Gilgoff, Eunsong Park, Julvette Price, Tiffinee Scott, Tyrell Moyd, Katie Rouse, Gabby Knighton, Jodi Frey, Nicole Mattocks, Erika Shook, Michelle Tuten, Jay Unick, Fernando A Wagner","doi":"10.54656/jces.v15i1.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forming equity-based community-academic partnerships focused on recovery research is a time- consuming and challenging endeavor, but one well worth the care and effort required. Through building trusting relationships, vital research collaborations emerge, which are driven by expressed community needs and supported with university resources. This article describes the stakeholder engagement process utilized by a university-based and opioid-focused initiative entitled Innovations in Recovery through Infrastructure Support (IRIS). IRIS developed a diverse and representative network of clinical providers, peer recovery workers, academics, and other behavioral health leaders. The process was informed by community-based participatory research (CBPR) practices and principles aimed at creating equitable partnerships. Lessons learned include the need to reshape the relationship between research and the community through an acknowledgment of harms committed by academia, as well as the importance of maintaining an approach of humility, accountability, and patience with the partnership process. Concrete benefits that go beyond the long-term promise of change, including compensating partners financially for their time, help ensure equity. A commitment to always asking \"Who's missing?\" and then filling those gaps builds a broad network inclusive of the various constituencies that make up the recovery support system. As IRIS builds on these lessons learned and plans next steps, we share our experience to support others engaged in forming community-academic partnerships through deep stakeholder engagement and use of participatory approaches within and outside of recovery research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762856/pdf/nihms-1855329.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v15i1.479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forming equity-based community-academic partnerships focused on recovery research is a time- consuming and challenging endeavor, but one well worth the care and effort required. Through building trusting relationships, vital research collaborations emerge, which are driven by expressed community needs and supported with university resources. This article describes the stakeholder engagement process utilized by a university-based and opioid-focused initiative entitled Innovations in Recovery through Infrastructure Support (IRIS). IRIS developed a diverse and representative network of clinical providers, peer recovery workers, academics, and other behavioral health leaders. The process was informed by community-based participatory research (CBPR) practices and principles aimed at creating equitable partnerships. Lessons learned include the need to reshape the relationship between research and the community through an acknowledgment of harms committed by academia, as well as the importance of maintaining an approach of humility, accountability, and patience with the partnership process. Concrete benefits that go beyond the long-term promise of change, including compensating partners financially for their time, help ensure equity. A commitment to always asking "Who's missing?" and then filling those gaps builds a broad network inclusive of the various constituencies that make up the recovery support system. As IRIS builds on these lessons learned and plans next steps, we share our experience to support others engaged in forming community-academic partnerships through deep stakeholder engagement and use of participatory approaches within and outside of recovery research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为阿片类药物康复研究建立公平的社区-学术合作伙伴关系:从利益相关者与同行和提供者组织的互动中学到的经验。
建立以康复研究为重点的公平社区-学术合作伙伴关系是一项耗时且极具挑战性的工作,但却非常值得我们为之付出心血和努力。通过建立相互信任的关系,重要的研究合作得以产生,这些合作由社区明确的需求驱动,并得到大学资源的支持。本文介绍了一项以大学为基础、以阿片类药物为重点、名为 "通过基础设施支持实现康复创新"(IRIS)的倡议所采用的利益相关者参与流程。IRIS 建立了一个由临床服务提供者、同侪康复工作者、学者和其他行为健康领导者组成的多样化且具有代表性的网络。这一过程借鉴了社区参与式研究 (CBPR) 的实践和原则,旨在建立公平的合作伙伴关系。从中汲取的经验教训包括:需要通过承认学术界所造成的伤害来重塑研究与社区之间的关系,以及在合作过程中保持谦逊、负责和耐心的重要性。超越长期变革承诺的具体利益,包括在经济上补偿合作伙伴的时间,有助于确保公平。始终坚持询问 "还缺什么人?",然后填补这些空白,这样就能建立起一个广泛的网络,包括构成康复支持系统的各种支持者。在国际康复研究所汲取这些经验教训并计划下一步行动的过程中,我们将分享我们的经验,以支持其他机构通过利益相关者的深入参与以及在康复研究内外使用参与式方法来建立社区-学术合作伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Honoring Culture and Voice By Empowering the Community: How a Grassroots Community Center Became the Waipahu Safe Haven Life on the Island: Collage Portraiture and Storytelling as Community Building Embracing Community-Centric Careers in a Post-Barbie World: Navigating Identity, Expectations, and Impact in Medicine and Veterinary Medicine Community Perspectives on Readiness and Social Drivers of Crime Toward a Beloved Community: Facilitated Group Listening as a Tool for Community Development and Civic Engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1