Reliability of the scapular dyskinesis test yes-no classification in asymptomatic individuals between students and expert physical therapists.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-17 DOI:10.5397/cise.2022.01109
Lawrence S Ramiscal, Lori A Bolgla, Chad E Cook, John S Magel, Stephen A Parada, Raymond Chong
{"title":"Reliability of the scapular dyskinesis test yes-no classification in asymptomatic individuals between students and expert physical therapists.","authors":"Lawrence S Ramiscal,&nbsp;Lori A Bolgla,&nbsp;Chad E Cook,&nbsp;John S Magel,&nbsp;Stephen A Parada,&nbsp;Raymond Chong","doi":"10.5397/cise.2022.01109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scapular dyskinesis is considered a risk factor for the shoulder pain that may warrant screening for prevention. Clinicians of all experience screen scapular dyskinesis using the scapular dyskinesis test yes-no classification (Y-N), yet its reliability in asymptomatic individuals is unknown. We aimed to establish Y-N's intra- and inter-reliability between students and expert physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized a cross-sectional design using consecutive asymptomatic subjects. Six students and two experts rated 100 subjects using the Y-N. Cohen's kappa (κ) and Krippendorff's alpha (K-α) were calculated to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra- and inter-rater values for experts were κ=0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.93) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84-0.87) respectively; students were κ=0.77 (95% CI, 0.75-0.78) and K-α=0.63 (95% CI, 0.58-0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Y-N is reliable in detecting scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals regardless of experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"25 4","pages":"321-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/ed/cise-2022-01109.PMC9727491.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.01109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Scapular dyskinesis is considered a risk factor for the shoulder pain that may warrant screening for prevention. Clinicians of all experience screen scapular dyskinesis using the scapular dyskinesis test yes-no classification (Y-N), yet its reliability in asymptomatic individuals is unknown. We aimed to establish Y-N's intra- and inter-reliability between students and expert physical therapists.

Methods: We utilized a cross-sectional design using consecutive asymptomatic subjects. Six students and two experts rated 100 subjects using the Y-N. Cohen's kappa (κ) and Krippendorff's alpha (K-α) were calculated to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Results: Intra- and inter-rater values for experts were κ=0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.93) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84-0.87) respectively; students were κ=0.77 (95% CI, 0.75-0.78) and K-α=0.63 (95% CI, 0.58-0.67).

Conclusions: The Y-N is reliable in detecting scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals regardless of experience.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩胛骨运动障碍测试的可靠性在学生和专业物理治疗师之间对无症状个体进行是非分类。
背景:肩胛骨运动障碍被认为是肩部疼痛的一个危险因素,可能需要进行预防筛查。所有经验的临床医生都使用肩胛骨运动障碍测试是非分类(Y-N)来筛查肩胛骨运动功能障碍,但其在无症状个体中的可靠性尚不清楚。我们的目的是在学生和专业物理治疗师之间建立Y-N的内部和相互可靠性。方法:我们采用横断面设计,使用连续的无症状受试者。六名学生和两名专家使用Y-N对100名受试者进行了评分。计算Cohen’s kappa(κ)和Krippendorff’s alpha(K-α),以确定评分者内和评分者间的可靠性。结果:专家的评分内和评分间值分别为κ=0.92(95%可信区间[CI],0.91-0.93)和0.85(95%置信区间,0.84-0.87);学生的κ=0.77(95%CI,0.75-0.78)和K-α=0.63(95%CI,0.58-0.67)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of electromyography biofeedback training on scapular kinematics and muscle activation in patients with scapular dyskinesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical management of internal impingement in overhead athletes: a systematic review. Impact of routine upright clavicle radiographs on clavicle fracture management. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction in revision total elbow arthroplasty with significant bone loss: a systematic review. Concomitant subscapularis tendon repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and assessment of superior migration of reattachment: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1