The hippocampus and long-term memory.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1080/17588928.2022.2128736
Scott D Slotnick
{"title":"The hippocampus and long-term memory.","authors":"Scott D Slotnick","doi":"10.1080/17588928.2022.2128736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This special issue of <i>Cognitive Neuroscience</i> focuses on the roles of the hippocampus during long-term memory. A discussion paper by Tallman, Clark, and Smith (this issue) found that functional connectivity of the hippocampus with the parahippocampal cortex and fusiform gyrus decreased with memory age, providing support for systems consolidation. Commentaries were received by Berdugo-Vega and Gräff (this issue), Feld and Gerchen (this issue), Gellersen and Simons (this issue), Gobbo, Mitchell-Heggs, and Tse (this issue), Gilmore, Audrain, and Martin (this issue), Kirwan (this issue), Manns (this issue), Runyan and Brooks (this issue), Santangelo (this issue), and Yang (this issue). The author response considered the content and context of memorial information along with neuroanatomy and functional specialization and conducted new analyses to clarify their findings. An empirical fMRI paper by Thakral, Yu, and Rugg (this issue) reported that the hippocampus was sensitive to the amount of contextual information retrieved, regardless of remember-know status. Another empirical study by Bjornn, Van, and Kirwan (this issue) found that hippocampal activation changes were correlated with the number of fixations at study for correct but not incorrect mnemonic discrimination judgments. A second discussion paper (Slotnick, this issue) concluded that no fMRI studies have provided evidence that the hippocampus is associated with working memory. Commentaries were received by Courtney (this issue), Kessels and Bergmann (this issue), Peters and Reithler (this issue), Rose and Chao (this issue), Stern and Hasselmo (this issue), and Wood, Clark, and Nee (this issue). The articles in this special issue illustrate that the roles of the hippocampus in long-term memory (and other types of memory) are under active investigation and provide many directions for research in the immediate future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10413,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"13 3-4","pages":"113-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2022.2128736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This special issue of Cognitive Neuroscience focuses on the roles of the hippocampus during long-term memory. A discussion paper by Tallman, Clark, and Smith (this issue) found that functional connectivity of the hippocampus with the parahippocampal cortex and fusiform gyrus decreased with memory age, providing support for systems consolidation. Commentaries were received by Berdugo-Vega and Gräff (this issue), Feld and Gerchen (this issue), Gellersen and Simons (this issue), Gobbo, Mitchell-Heggs, and Tse (this issue), Gilmore, Audrain, and Martin (this issue), Kirwan (this issue), Manns (this issue), Runyan and Brooks (this issue), Santangelo (this issue), and Yang (this issue). The author response considered the content and context of memorial information along with neuroanatomy and functional specialization and conducted new analyses to clarify their findings. An empirical fMRI paper by Thakral, Yu, and Rugg (this issue) reported that the hippocampus was sensitive to the amount of contextual information retrieved, regardless of remember-know status. Another empirical study by Bjornn, Van, and Kirwan (this issue) found that hippocampal activation changes were correlated with the number of fixations at study for correct but not incorrect mnemonic discrimination judgments. A second discussion paper (Slotnick, this issue) concluded that no fMRI studies have provided evidence that the hippocampus is associated with working memory. Commentaries were received by Courtney (this issue), Kessels and Bergmann (this issue), Peters and Reithler (this issue), Rose and Chao (this issue), Stern and Hasselmo (this issue), and Wood, Clark, and Nee (this issue). The articles in this special issue illustrate that the roles of the hippocampus in long-term memory (and other types of memory) are under active investigation and provide many directions for research in the immediate future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海马体和长期记忆。
本期《认知神经科学》特刊关注的是海马体在长期记忆中的作用。由Tallman, Clark和Smith撰写的一篇讨论论文(本期)发现,海马与海马旁皮层和梭状回的功能连通性随着记忆年龄的增长而下降,这为系统巩固提供了支持。贝尔杜戈-维加和Gräff(本期)、费尔德和格琛(本期)、盖勒森和西蒙斯(本期)、戈博、米切尔-赫格斯和谢霆霆谷(本期)、吉尔摩、奥德兰和马丁(本期)、柯文(本期)、曼恩斯(本期)、Runyan和布鲁克斯(本期)、圣安杰洛(本期)和杨(本期)发表了评论。作者的回应考虑了纪念信息的内容和背景以及神经解剖学和功能专业化,并进行了新的分析来澄清他们的发现。一篇由Thakral、Yu和Rugg撰写的fMRI实证论文(本期)报道,海马体对检索到的上下文信息的数量很敏感,而不管记忆-知道状态如何。Bjornn、Van和Kirwan的另一项实证研究(本期)发现,海马的激活变化与研究中正确而非错误的助记辨别判断的注视次数相关。第二篇讨论论文(Slotnick,本期)得出结论,没有fMRI研究提供证据表明海马体与工作记忆有关。考特尼(本期)、凯塞尔和伯格曼(本期)、彼得斯和瑞斯勒(本期)、罗斯和赵(本期)、斯特恩和哈塞尔莫(本期)以及伍德、克拉克和尼(本期)都收到了评论。这期特刊的文章说明了海马体在长期记忆(和其他类型的记忆)中的作用正在积极研究中,并为不久的将来提供了许多研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuroscience publishes high quality discussion papers and empirical papers on any topic in the field of cognitive neuroscience including perception, attention, memory, language, action, social cognition, and executive function. The journal covers findings based on a variety of techniques such as fMRI, ERPs, MEG, TMS, and focal lesion studies. Contributions that employ or discuss multiple techniques to shed light on the spatial-temporal brain mechanisms underlying a cognitive process are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Visuo-spatial working memory abilities modulate mental rotation: Evidence from event-related potentials. Theoretical strategies for an embodied cognitive neuroscience: Mechanistic explanations of brain-body-environment systems. Beyond embodiment: Rethinking the integration of cognitive neuroscience and mechanistic explanations. Embodied (4EA) cognitive computational neuroscience. How to build a better 4E cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1