[Patient isolation during Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: the caregivers' experience in a neuro-rehabilitation unit].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1702/3920.39045
Giulia Bindella, Davide Caruzzo, Sonia Sbrugnera, Matteo Danielis, Irene Mansutti
{"title":"[Patient isolation during Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: the caregivers' experience in a neuro-rehabilitation unit].","authors":"Giulia Bindella,&nbsp;Davide Caruzzo,&nbsp;Sonia Sbrugnera,&nbsp;Matteo Danielis,&nbsp;Irene Mansutti","doi":"10.1702/3920.39045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>. Patient isolation during Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: the caregivers' experience in a neuro-rehabilitation unit.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the Covid-19 pandemic, caregiver visits were suspended in many health care facilities and, even today, limitations remain. These restrictions have impacted not only the patients but also caregivers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the life experience of caregivers of hospitalized patients, during the pandemic and the impact of visit limitations in a rehabilitation unit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An exploratory qualitative study was conducted, following the COREQ guidelines. Caregivers of inpatients were purposefully sampled and interviewed, until data saturation. A qualitative thematic analysis with an inductive approach was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen caregivers were interviewed. The themes emerged were: 1. perception of the illness as a sudden change; 2. concerns for their loved one (i.e. the loneliness or the suffering); 3. critical (difficult to organize and perceived too short) and positive aspects of the visits; 4. barriers to communication (for example, masks when in presence; or the difficult use of technologies by elders); 5. patient's protection and support (thinking that the relative's presence may improve the rehabilitation); 6. emotions (from discouragement when visits were not allowed, to joy when meeting their loved one).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers experienced uncertainty, worry, anxiety, fear, and lack of understanding of their loved one's clinical situation. Alternatives to the visits or the visits with physical barriers were helpful but not always effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":55447,"journal":{"name":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","volume":"41 3","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1702/3920.39045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Patient isolation during Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: the caregivers' experience in a neuro-rehabilitation unit.

Introduction: During the Covid-19 pandemic, caregiver visits were suspended in many health care facilities and, even today, limitations remain. These restrictions have impacted not only the patients but also caregivers.

Aim: To explore the life experience of caregivers of hospitalized patients, during the pandemic and the impact of visit limitations in a rehabilitation unit.

Method: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted, following the COREQ guidelines. Caregivers of inpatients were purposefully sampled and interviewed, until data saturation. A qualitative thematic analysis with an inductive approach was performed.

Results: Fifteen caregivers were interviewed. The themes emerged were: 1. perception of the illness as a sudden change; 2. concerns for their loved one (i.e. the loneliness or the suffering); 3. critical (difficult to organize and perceived too short) and positive aspects of the visits; 4. barriers to communication (for example, masks when in presence; or the difficult use of technologies by elders); 5. patient's protection and support (thinking that the relative's presence may improve the rehabilitation); 6. emotions (from discouragement when visits were not allowed, to joy when meeting their loved one).

Conclusions: Caregivers experienced uncertainty, worry, anxiety, fear, and lack of understanding of their loved one's clinical situation. Alternatives to the visits or the visits with physical barriers were helpful but not always effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Sars-CoV-2大流行期间患者隔离:护理人员在神经康复病房的经历]。
。Sars-CoV-2大流行期间的患者隔离:护理人员在神经康复病房的经历导言:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,许多卫生保健机构暂停了护理人员探视,即使在今天,限制仍然存在。这些限制不仅影响了患者,也影响了护理人员。目的:探讨疫情期间住院病人护理人员的生活体验及康复病房探视限制的影响。方法:遵循COREQ指南进行探索性定性研究。有目的地对住院病人的护理人员进行抽样和访谈,直到数据饱和。采用归纳方法进行了定性专题分析。结果:访谈15名护理人员。出现的主题是:1;将疾病视为突然的变化;2. 关心他们所爱的人(即孤独或痛苦);3.访问的关键(难以组织和感觉太短)和积极方面;4. 沟通障碍(例如,在场时戴口罩;或者老年人难以使用技术);5. 患者的保护和支持(认为亲属的存在可能会改善康复);6. 情绪(不允许探视时的沮丧,见到爱人时的喜悦)。结论:照顾者经历了不确定、担心、焦虑、恐惧和缺乏对他们所爱的人临床情况的理解。替代访问或有物理障碍的访问是有帮助的,但并不总是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca (AIR) è una rivista scientifica che si propone l''obiettivo di promuovere e sviluppare il confronto sulle conoscenze che hanno un impatto sulla pratica, sulla formazione e sulla direzione dell''assistenza infermieristica.
期刊最新文献
[Patient and public involvement in research]. [What to do when questions are many and the answers do not have deadlines?] [Tracheal rupture treated with robotic surgery: the importance of evidence-based practice in nursing management. A case report]. [Assessing the impact of bladder ultrasound on catheter-associated urinary tract infections and health-care costs: an observational pre-post study]. [Septic shock in patient undergoing hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. A case report].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1