Positive and Neutral Needleless Connectors: A Comparative Study of Central-line Associated Bloodstream Infection, Occlusion, and Bacterial Contamination of the Connector Lumen.

IF 2.9 Q1 NURSING Journal of Infusion Nursing Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000506
Donna Schora, Parul Patel, Ruby Barza, Jignesh Patel, Kathleen Wilson, Paulette Espina-Gabriel, Vesna Nunez, Kamaljit Singh
{"title":"Positive and Neutral Needleless Connectors: A Comparative Study of Central-line Associated Bloodstream Infection, Occlusion, and Bacterial Contamination of the Connector Lumen.","authors":"Donna Schora,&nbsp;Parul Patel,&nbsp;Ruby Barza,&nbsp;Jignesh Patel,&nbsp;Kathleen Wilson,&nbsp;Paulette Espina-Gabriel,&nbsp;Vesna Nunez,&nbsp;Kamaljit Singh","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A pragmatic, multiphase prospective quality improvement initiative was performed to determine whether a positive displacement connector (PD) causes reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), occlusion, and catheter hub colonization when compared with a neutral displacement connector with alcohol disinfecting cap (AC). Patients with an active central vascular access device (CVAD) were enrolled March 2018 to February 2019 (P2) and compared to the prior year (P1). Two hospitals were randomized to use PD without AC (Hospital A) and with AC (Hospital B). Two hospitals utilized a neutral displacement connector with AC (Hospitals C and D). CVADs were monitored for CLABSI, occlusion, and bacterial contamination during P2. Of the 2454 lines in the study, 1049 were cultured. CLABSI decreased in all groups between P1 and P2: Hospital A, 13 (1.1%) to 2 (0.2%); Hospital B, 2 (0.3%) to 0; and Hospitals C and D, 5 (0.5%) to 1 (0.1%). CLABSI reduction was equivalent between P1 and P2 with and without AC, at around 86%. The rate of occlusion per lumen was 14.4%, 12.1%, and 8.5% for Hospitals A, B and C, D, respectively. Hospitals using PD had a higher rate of occlusion than those that did not (P = .003). Lumen contamination with pathogens was 1.5% for Hospitals A and B and 2.1% for Hospitals C and D (P = .38). The rate of CLABSI was reduced with both connectors, and PD reduced infections with and without the use of AC. Both connector types had low-level catheter hub colonization with significant bacteria. The lowest rates of occlusion were found in the group using neutral displacement connectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A pragmatic, multiphase prospective quality improvement initiative was performed to determine whether a positive displacement connector (PD) causes reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), occlusion, and catheter hub colonization when compared with a neutral displacement connector with alcohol disinfecting cap (AC). Patients with an active central vascular access device (CVAD) were enrolled March 2018 to February 2019 (P2) and compared to the prior year (P1). Two hospitals were randomized to use PD without AC (Hospital A) and with AC (Hospital B). Two hospitals utilized a neutral displacement connector with AC (Hospitals C and D). CVADs were monitored for CLABSI, occlusion, and bacterial contamination during P2. Of the 2454 lines in the study, 1049 were cultured. CLABSI decreased in all groups between P1 and P2: Hospital A, 13 (1.1%) to 2 (0.2%); Hospital B, 2 (0.3%) to 0; and Hospitals C and D, 5 (0.5%) to 1 (0.1%). CLABSI reduction was equivalent between P1 and P2 with and without AC, at around 86%. The rate of occlusion per lumen was 14.4%, 12.1%, and 8.5% for Hospitals A, B and C, D, respectively. Hospitals using PD had a higher rate of occlusion than those that did not (P = .003). Lumen contamination with pathogens was 1.5% for Hospitals A and B and 2.1% for Hospitals C and D (P = .38). The rate of CLABSI was reduced with both connectors, and PD reduced infections with and without the use of AC. Both connector types had low-level catheter hub colonization with significant bacteria. The lowest rates of occlusion were found in the group using neutral displacement connectors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阳性和中性无针连接器:连接器管腔中线相关血流感染、闭塞和细菌污染的比较研究。
一项实用的、多阶段的前瞻性质量改进计划被执行,以确定与带有酒精消毒帽(AC)的中性位移连接器相比,正位移连接器(PD)是否能减少中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)、闭塞和导管中心定菌。2018年3月至2019年2月(P2)招募了带有活动性中枢血管通路装置(CVAD)的患者,并与前一年(P1)进行了比较。两家医院随机分为不带AC的PD组(A医院)和带AC的PD组(B医院)。两家医院使用带AC的中性位移连接器(C医院和D医院)。在P2期间监测cvad的CLABSI、闭塞和细菌污染。在研究的2454个品系中,有1049个进行了培养。P1和P2之间CLABSI均下降:A医院,13(1.1%)至2 (0.2%);B医院,2(0.3%)至0;C医院和D医院为5(0.5%)比1(0.1%)。在有和没有交流电的情况下,P1和P2的CLABSI减少量相当,约为86%。A、B医院和C、D医院的每腔闭塞率分别为14.4%、12.1%和8.5%。使用PD的医院的闭塞率高于未使用PD的医院(P = 0.003)。A、B医院的管腔致病菌污染率为1.5%,C、D医院为2.1% (P = 0.38)。两种连接器都降低了CLABSI的发生率,PD降低了使用AC和不使用AC的感染。两种连接器类型的导管中心定植水平都很低,细菌数量显著。使用中性位移接头组的咬合率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Pumping Infusion-Induced Contamination With Different Syringe Types. An Exemplary Publication. Complications Related to the Securement Device in Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Study. Midline Catheter-Associated Thrombosis (MCAT): Does Tip Location in the Axillary Vein Increase Risk? Parenteral Nutrition Safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1