Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Behavior Pub Date : 2022-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x
Carlos Algara, Sharif Amlani, Samuel Collitt, Isaac Hale, Sara Kazemian
{"title":"Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.","authors":"Carlos Algara, Sharif Amlani, Samuel Collitt, Isaac Hale, Sara Kazemian","doi":"10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From the onset of the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in January 2020 to Election Day in November, the United States experienced over 9,400,000 cases and 232,000 deaths. This crisis largely defined the campaign between former Vice President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump, centering on the Trump administration's efforts in mitigating the number of cases and deaths. While conventional wisdom suggested that Trump and his party would lose support due to the severity of COVID-19 across the country, such an effect is hotly debated empirically and theoretically. In this research, we evaluate the extent to which the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic influenced support for President Trump in the 2020 election. Across differing modeling strategies and a variety of data sources, we find evidence that President Trump gained support in counties with higher COVID-19 deaths. We provide an explanation for this finding by showing that voters concerned about the economic impacts of pandemic-related restrictions on activity were more likely to support Trump and that local COVID-19 severity was predictive of these economic concerns. While COVID-19 likely contributed to Trump's loss in 2020, our analysis demonstrates that he gained support among voters in localities worst affected by the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":48166,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the onset of the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in January 2020 to Election Day in November, the United States experienced over 9,400,000 cases and 232,000 deaths. This crisis largely defined the campaign between former Vice President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump, centering on the Trump administration's efforts in mitigating the number of cases and deaths. While conventional wisdom suggested that Trump and his party would lose support due to the severity of COVID-19 across the country, such an effect is hotly debated empirically and theoretically. In this research, we evaluate the extent to which the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic influenced support for President Trump in the 2020 election. Across differing modeling strategies and a variety of data sources, we find evidence that President Trump gained support in counties with higher COVID-19 deaths. We provide an explanation for this finding by showing that voters concerned about the economic impacts of pandemic-related restrictions on activity were more likely to support Trump and that local COVID-19 severity was predictive of these economic concerns. While COVID-19 likely contributed to Trump's loss in 2020, our analysis demonstrates that he gained support among voters in localities worst affected by the pandemic.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棺材里的钉子还是生命线?评估 COVID-19 在 2020 年大选中对特朗普总统的选举影响。
从 2020 年 1 月出现第一例 COVID-19 确诊病例到 11 月大选日,美国经历了超过 940 万例病例和 23.2 万例死亡。这场危机在很大程度上决定了前副总统乔-拜登和总统唐纳德-特朗普之间的竞选,其核心是特朗普政府在减少病例和死亡人数方面所做的努力。虽然传统观点认为,特朗普及其政党会因 COVID-19 在全国范围内的严重性而失去支持,但这种影响在经验和理论上都存在激烈的争论。在本研究中,我们评估了 COVID-19 大流行的严重程度在多大程度上影响了特朗普总统在 2020 年大选中的支持率。通过不同的建模策略和各种数据来源,我们发现有证据表明,在 COVID-19 死亡人数较高的县,特朗普总统获得了更多的支持。我们对这一发现进行了解释,表明担心与大流行病相关的活动限制会对经济造成影响的选民更有可能支持特朗普,而当地 COVID-19 的严重程度可以预测这些经济担忧。虽然 COVID-19 可能导致了特朗普在 2020 年的失利,但我们的分析表明,他在受大流行病影响最严重的地方获得了选民的支持:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Political Behavior
Political Behavior POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Political Behavior publishes original research in the general fields of political behavior, institutions, processes, and policies. Approaches include economic (preference structuring, bargaining), psychological (attitude formation and change, motivations, perceptions), sociological (roles, group, class), or political (decision making, coalitions, influence). Articles focus on the political behavior (conventional or unconventional) of the individual person or small group (microanalysis), or of large organizations that participate in the political process such as parties, interest groups, political action committees, governmental agencies, and mass media (macroanalysis). As an interdisciplinary journal, Political Behavior integrates various approaches across different levels of theoretical abstraction and empirical domain (contextual analysis). Officially cited as: Polit Behav
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Electability: Candidate (and Voter) Ideology, Race, and Gender Risk Preferences in the Delegation Process Support for Gun Reform in the United States: The Interactive Relationship Between Partisanship and Trust in the Federal Government Millionaire Justices and Attitudes Towards the Supreme Court Racial and Partisan Social Information Prompts Campaign Giving: Evidence from a Field Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1