Comparison of the Effects of Myofascial Meridian Stretching Exercises and Acupuncture in Patients with Low Back Pain.

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.6.347
Dilek Eker Büyükşireci, Nesrin Demirsoy, Setenay Mit, Ersel Geçioğlu, İlknur Onurlu, Zafer Günendi
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Myofascial Meridian Stretching Exercises and Acupuncture in Patients with Low Back Pain.","authors":"Dilek Eker Büyükşireci,&nbsp;Nesrin Demirsoy,&nbsp;Setenay Mit,&nbsp;Ersel Geçioğlu,&nbsp;İlknur Onurlu,&nbsp;Zafer Günendi","doi":"10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.6.347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acupuncture and myofascial meridians show great anatomical and clinical compatibility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare the effects of myofascial meridian stretching exercises and acupuncture in patients with low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 81 subjects with acute/subacute low back pain into three groups: an acupuncture (A) group, a myofascial meridian stretching (MMS) group, and a control (C) group. We recorded the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Roland- Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) scores at baseline and weeks two and six. We evaluated posterior pelvic tilt and transversus abdominis muscle strenghth with a pressure biofeedback unit, back extensor muscle strength by the Sorenson test, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) with an inclinometer. Group A received acupuncture (BL 57 and BL 62 acupoints) and stretching exercises according to the posterior superficial line were applied to the MMS group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvements in the NRS score were more prominent in group A than in group C (<i>p</i> = 0.004). The RMQ score improvement between baseline and weeks two and six was more prominent in groups A and MMS (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). The Sorenson test showed significant improvement between the baseline and week two in groups A and MMS (<i>p</i> = 0.004, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). The increase in lumbar ROM measurement in the MMS group between baseline and week two was significantly higher than in groups A and C (<i>p</i> = 0.009, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stretching exercises according to the myofascial meridian system and acupuncture contributed to improved symptoms in the first two weeks in patients with acute/subacute low-back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.6.347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acupuncture and myofascial meridians show great anatomical and clinical compatibility.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the effects of myofascial meridian stretching exercises and acupuncture in patients with low back pain.

Methods: We randomized 81 subjects with acute/subacute low back pain into three groups: an acupuncture (A) group, a myofascial meridian stretching (MMS) group, and a control (C) group. We recorded the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Roland- Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) scores at baseline and weeks two and six. We evaluated posterior pelvic tilt and transversus abdominis muscle strenghth with a pressure biofeedback unit, back extensor muscle strength by the Sorenson test, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) with an inclinometer. Group A received acupuncture (BL 57 and BL 62 acupoints) and stretching exercises according to the posterior superficial line were applied to the MMS group.

Results: Improvements in the NRS score were more prominent in group A than in group C (p = 0.004). The RMQ score improvement between baseline and weeks two and six was more prominent in groups A and MMS (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). The Sorenson test showed significant improvement between the baseline and week two in groups A and MMS (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, respectively). The increase in lumbar ROM measurement in the MMS group between baseline and week two was significantly higher than in groups A and C (p = 0.009, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Stretching exercises according to the myofascial meridian system and acupuncture contributed to improved symptoms in the first two weeks in patients with acute/subacute low-back pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌筋膜经络伸展运动与针刺治疗腰痛疗效比较。
背景:针刺与肌筋膜经络在解剖学和临床上具有很强的相容性。目的:我们的目的是比较肌筋膜经络伸展运动和针灸对腰痛患者的影响。方法:将81例急性/亚急性腰痛患者随机分为针刺组(A)、肌筋膜经络拉伸组(MMS)和对照组(C)。我们在基线和第2周和第6周记录了数值评定量表(NRS)和罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMQ)得分。我们用压力生物反馈装置评估后骨盆倾斜和腹横肌力量,用Sorenson试验评估后伸肌力量,用倾斜仪评估腰椎活动度。A组采用针刺(bl57、bl62穴位),MMS组按后浅表线进行伸展运动。结果:A组NRS评分较C组改善更明显(p = 0.004)。基线与第2周和第6周之间RMQ评分的改善在A组和MMS组中更为显著(p < 0.001, p = 0.001)。Sorenson检验显示,A组和MMS组在基线和第2周之间有显著改善(p = 0.004, p < 0.001)。从基线到第2周,MMS组腰椎ROM测量的增加明显高于A组和C组(p = 0.009, p < 0.001)。结论:根据肌筋膜经络系统进行伸展运动和针灸有助于急性/亚急性腰痛患者前两周的症状改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine. Manuscripts should fall into one of the categories: topical review, original research paper, brief ... click here for full Aims & Scope The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture for Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia: a Case Report. Electroacupuncture Protocol for Sensory and Motor Function Recovery After Orthognathic Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial. The Transformation of Acupuncture Practice Using Ultrasonography: Expert Opinions. Acupoint Autohemotherapy Alleviates Airway Inflammation in Asthmatic Rats via Upregulating Expression of Hemeoxygenase-1. Auriculotherapy for Labour Pain Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1