Herbal therapy in opioid withdrawal syndrome: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi, Mohammad Ali Ahmadianmoghadam, Mehrnaz Mehrabani, Masoud Moghadari, Adel Ghorani-Azam, Mehrzad Mehrbani
{"title":"Herbal therapy in opioid withdrawal syndrome: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Ahmadianmoghadam,&nbsp;Mehrnaz Mehrabani,&nbsp;Masoud Moghadari,&nbsp;Adel Ghorani-Azam,&nbsp;Mehrzad Mehrbani","doi":"10.22122/AHJ.2022.195961.1247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicinal plants have revealed much attention as an alternative or complementary treatment for opioid withdrawal syndrome. The current review collects all available literature to verify the efficiency of herbal remedies in the management of symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted from January 1990 to May 2021 on four bibliographic databases (Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) using the search terms \"medicinal plant\", \"withdrawal syndrome\", \"opioid\", and all their equivalents. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in the English language were included for data synthesis. The search was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to verify the quality of the included clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 12 RCTs were collected and used for data synthesis. The results of these studies indicated that herbal medicines were effective in treating opioid withdrawal syndrome and could alleviate the withdrawal symptoms, such as abdominal constrictions, diarrhea, bone pain, perspiration, and insomnia, when compared to conventional medications such as buprenorphine, clonidine, and methadone. However, more than 30% of RCTs were found to be at high risk of bias in the areas of selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although several RCTs have proven that herbal remedies are effective in reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms, the findings need to be viewed more carefully. Further RCTs with more participants, longer duration, and less risk of bias are needed in the claimed cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":33943,"journal":{"name":"Addiction and Health","volume":"14 2","pages":"152-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/f3/ahj-14-152.PMC9743811.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22122/AHJ.2022.195961.1247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medicinal plants have revealed much attention as an alternative or complementary treatment for opioid withdrawal syndrome. The current review collects all available literature to verify the efficiency of herbal remedies in the management of symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from January 1990 to May 2021 on four bibliographic databases (Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) using the search terms "medicinal plant", "withdrawal syndrome", "opioid", and all their equivalents. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in the English language were included for data synthesis. The search was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to verify the quality of the included clinical trials.

Findings: A total of 12 RCTs were collected and used for data synthesis. The results of these studies indicated that herbal medicines were effective in treating opioid withdrawal syndrome and could alleviate the withdrawal symptoms, such as abdominal constrictions, diarrhea, bone pain, perspiration, and insomnia, when compared to conventional medications such as buprenorphine, clonidine, and methadone. However, more than 30% of RCTs were found to be at high risk of bias in the areas of selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting.

Conclusion: Although several RCTs have proven that herbal remedies are effective in reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms, the findings need to be viewed more carefully. Further RCTs with more participants, longer duration, and less risk of bias are needed in the claimed cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类戒断综合征的草药治疗:随机临床试验的系统回顾。
背景:药用植物作为阿片类戒断综合征的替代或补充治疗已受到广泛关注。目前的综述收集了所有可用的文献,以验证草药治疗阿片类药物戒断相关症状的有效性。方法:系统检索1990年1月至2021年5月Scopus、PubMed、Embase和Web of Science四个书目数据库的文献,检索词为“药用植物”、“戒断综合征”、“阿片类药物”及其等同物。所有以英文发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)纳入数据综合。根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目进行搜索。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具验证纳入临床试验的质量。结果:共收集了12项随机对照试验,用于数据综合。这些研究结果表明,与丁丙诺啡、可口定、美沙酮等传统药物相比,草药治疗阿片类药物戒断综合征是有效的,可以减轻戒断症状,如腹部收缩、腹泻、骨痛、出汗、失眠。然而,超过30%的随机对照试验在选择、表现、检测、减员和报告等方面存在高偏倚风险。结论:虽然一些随机对照试验已经证明草药在减少阿片类药物戒断症状方面是有效的,但研究结果需要更仔细地看待。进一步的随机对照试验需要更多的参与者、更长的持续时间和更低的偏倚风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol Abstinence, Adherence, and Attitudes toward Disulfiram Treatment for Alcohol Dependence among Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Setting in North India. Characteristics of Waterpipe Smokers Who Are Willing to Quit: Population-Based Findings from Syria. Does Tramadol Exposure Have Unfavorable Effects on Hippocampus? A Review Study. Potential Involvement of Apelin/APJ System in Addiction and Neuroprotection Against Drugs of Abuse. Smartphone Usage and Addiction among Undergraduate Dental Students in South India: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1