Leading in the Paradoxical World of Crises: How Leaders Navigate Through Crises.

Charlotte Förster, Caroline Paparella, Stephanie Duchek, Wolfgang H Güttel
{"title":"Leading in the Paradoxical World of Crises: How Leaders Navigate Through Crises.","authors":"Charlotte Förster,&nbsp;Caroline Paparella,&nbsp;Stephanie Duchek,&nbsp;Wolfgang H Güttel","doi":"10.1007/s41471-022-00147-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Living and operating in a global world, the risk for a global economic crisis has never been greater. As ongoing events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the recent war in Ukraine or the sharply increasing inflation have shown, organizations need to be highly resilient to persevere in a crisis-prone world. Even though we know that crises serve as a focal lens on leadership behavior and leaders play a crucial role in these scenarios, little is known as to how leaders handle an existence-threatening organizational crisis. Using an inductive analysis of 32 interviews on crisis leadership, we show that in the case of an acute crisis, leaders apply different paradoxical behaviors to cope effectively with the situation and navigate their organizations through these events. More specifically, our study contributes to existing literature by, first, showing that the distinctiveness of crises results from the fact that leaders are confronted with paradoxes that they can otherwise smoothly separate in terms of time or organization, second, revealing that the leader's paradoxical behaviors as a respond are derived from their mindset to consciously recognize the contradictory demands of the crisis, and third, from their action in terms of a compressed situational leadership. By identifying six pairs of paradoxical behaviors, we demonstrate how leaders effectively deal with the unsolvable contradictions that arise from the crisis, and thus contribute to the organizations' ability to cope with crises.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version of this article (10.1007/s41471-022-00147-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p>","PeriodicalId":74759,"journal":{"name":"Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung = Schmalenbach journal of business research","volume":"74 4","pages":"631-657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755787/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung = Schmalenbach journal of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-022-00147-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Living and operating in a global world, the risk for a global economic crisis has never been greater. As ongoing events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the recent war in Ukraine or the sharply increasing inflation have shown, organizations need to be highly resilient to persevere in a crisis-prone world. Even though we know that crises serve as a focal lens on leadership behavior and leaders play a crucial role in these scenarios, little is known as to how leaders handle an existence-threatening organizational crisis. Using an inductive analysis of 32 interviews on crisis leadership, we show that in the case of an acute crisis, leaders apply different paradoxical behaviors to cope effectively with the situation and navigate their organizations through these events. More specifically, our study contributes to existing literature by, first, showing that the distinctiveness of crises results from the fact that leaders are confronted with paradoxes that they can otherwise smoothly separate in terms of time or organization, second, revealing that the leader's paradoxical behaviors as a respond are derived from their mindset to consciously recognize the contradictory demands of the crisis, and third, from their action in terms of a compressed situational leadership. By identifying six pairs of paradoxical behaviors, we demonstrate how leaders effectively deal with the unsolvable contradictions that arise from the crisis, and thus contribute to the organizations' ability to cope with crises.

Supplementary information: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41471-022-00147-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在危机的矛盾世界中领导:领导者如何度过危机。
在一个全球化的世界中生活和经营,全球经济危机的风险从未如此之大。正如2019冠状病毒病大流行、最近的乌克兰战争或急剧上升的通货膨胀等持续发生的事件所表明的那样,组织需要具有高度的弹性,才能在一个危机频发的世界中坚持下去。尽管我们知道危机是领导行为的焦点,领导者在这些情况下发挥着至关重要的作用,但很少有人知道领导者如何处理威胁生存的组织危机。通过对32个关于危机领导力的访谈的归纳分析,我们表明,在严重危机的情况下,领导者采用不同的矛盾行为来有效地应对这种情况,并通过这些事件引导他们的组织。更具体地说,我们的研究对现有文献的贡献在于:首先,表明危机的独特性源于领导者面临的悖论,否则他们可以在时间或组织上顺利分离这些悖论;其次,揭示领导者作为回应的悖论行为源于他们有意识地认识到危机的矛盾需求的心态;从他们的行动来看,是一种压缩的情境领导。通过识别六对矛盾行为,我们展示了领导者如何有效地处理危机中产生的无法解决的矛盾,从而有助于组织应对危机的能力。补充信息:本文的在线版本(10.1007/s41471-022-00147-7)包含补充信息,授权用户可使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spillover of Social Norms at Work On Employees’ Self-Reported Private Sphere Pro-Environmental Behaviour: A Mixed Method Investigation What Drives Negative Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities? Revenue Effect Versus Corporate Life-Cycle Dynamics What Takes the Wind out of Their Sails? A Micro-Foundational Perspective of Challenges for Building Dynamic Capabilities Towards Digital Business Model Innovation (Ex)Change of Routines: An Action-Based Microfoundation The Interplay of Subsidiary Performance and Cultural Distance in International Downsizing Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1