A Simulation-Based Training Program in Rapid Sequence Induction for Novice Anesthesiology Trainees Using a Novel Checklist.

Osmond D Morris, Peter McCauley, Ruth Boylan, Crina Burlacu, Jennifer M Porter
{"title":"A Simulation-Based Training Program in Rapid Sequence Induction for Novice Anesthesiology Trainees Using a Novel Checklist.","authors":"Osmond D Morris,&nbsp;Peter McCauley,&nbsp;Ruth Boylan,&nbsp;Crina Burlacu,&nbsp;Jennifer M Porter","doi":"10.46374/volxxiv_issue4_morris","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The novice anesthesiology trainee is required to assimilate the technical and nontechnical skills required to safely perform a rapid sequence induction (RSI). Acquisition of this core competency is traditionally achieved using operating room-based experiential learning, which may be associated with significant gaps in early trainee preparation. We conducted a study to explore the role of a new, customized, high-fidelity simulation-based training program designed to address this gap in RSI training. We then assessed mean performance scores of participants in the simulator and 4 weeks later.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study assessed participants' performance in the simulator on the day of training and in the workplace 4 weeks later. There is no universally agreed checklist or cognitive aid incorporating nontechnical skills and planning for unanticipated difficult airway management in RSI, so we applied a new scoring checklist developed by 6 experts using the modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our task scoring checklist included nontechnical skills and consisted of 37 weighted parameters with a maximum performance score of 171. On the day of training, mean performance score was 105 (SD of 16). At the workplace evaluation 4 weeks after simulation training, the mean performance score of participants had increased to 140 (SD of 14.5; <i>P</i> = .001). The 95% confidence intervals for the simulator and workplace participant scores were 92 to 118 and 128 to 152, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that this simulation-based training in RSI was associated with an improvement in RSI performance in novice trainees and may complement the current system of workplace-based training.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"24 4","pages":"E695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753963/pdf/i2333-0406-24-4-Morris.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiv_issue4_morris","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The novice anesthesiology trainee is required to assimilate the technical and nontechnical skills required to safely perform a rapid sequence induction (RSI). Acquisition of this core competency is traditionally achieved using operating room-based experiential learning, which may be associated with significant gaps in early trainee preparation. We conducted a study to explore the role of a new, customized, high-fidelity simulation-based training program designed to address this gap in RSI training. We then assessed mean performance scores of participants in the simulator and 4 weeks later.

Methods: This observational study assessed participants' performance in the simulator on the day of training and in the workplace 4 weeks later. There is no universally agreed checklist or cognitive aid incorporating nontechnical skills and planning for unanticipated difficult airway management in RSI, so we applied a new scoring checklist developed by 6 experts using the modified Delphi technique.

Results: Our task scoring checklist included nontechnical skills and consisted of 37 weighted parameters with a maximum performance score of 171. On the day of training, mean performance score was 105 (SD of 16). At the workplace evaluation 4 weeks after simulation training, the mean performance score of participants had increased to 140 (SD of 14.5; P = .001). The 95% confidence intervals for the simulator and workplace participant scores were 92 to 118 and 128 to 152, respectively.

Conclusions: The results suggest that this simulation-based training in RSI was associated with an improvement in RSI performance in novice trainees and may complement the current system of workplace-based training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于模拟的快速序列诱导的麻醉学新手培训计划,使用一种新的检查表。
背景:麻醉学受训新手需要掌握安全执行快速序列诱导(RSI)所需的技术和非技术技能。这种核心能力的获得传统上是通过基于手术室的体验式学习来实现的,这可能与早期培训生准备的重大差距有关。我们进行了一项研究,以探索一种新的、定制的、高保真的基于模拟的培训计划的作用,该计划旨在解决RSI培训中的这一差距。然后我们评估参与者在模拟器和4周后的平均表现分数。方法:本观察性研究评估了参与者在培训当天和4周后在工作场所在模拟器中的表现。目前还没有普遍认可的检查表或认知辅助工具,包括非技术技能和RSI中意想不到的气道管理困难的计划,因此我们应用了由6位专家使用改进的德尔菲技术开发的新的评分检查表。结果:我们的任务评分表包括非技术技能,由37个加权参数组成,最高绩效得分为171。在训练当天,平均表现得分为105分(标准差为16)。在模拟训练4周后的工作场所评估中,参与者的平均绩效得分增加到140分(SD为14.5;P = .001)。模拟器和工作场所参与者得分的95%置信区间分别为92到118和128到152。结论:结果表明,这种基于模拟的RSI培训与新手RSI表现的改善有关,并且可以补充当前基于工作场所的培训系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1