Genetically predicted the causal relationship between gut microbiota and infertility: bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Epma Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-07 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s13167-023-00332-6
Yujia Xi, Chenwei Zhang, Yiqian Feng, Shurui Zhao, Yukai Zhang, Guosheng Duan, Wei Wang, Jingqi Wang
{"title":"Genetically predicted the causal relationship between gut microbiota and infertility: bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.","authors":"Yujia Xi, Chenwei Zhang, Yiqian Feng, Shurui Zhao, Yukai Zhang, Guosheng Duan, Wei Wang, Jingqi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s13167-023-00332-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several studies have reported the association between gut microbiota and infertility; however, the causal association between them remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the causal relationship between gut microbiota and infertility and evaluate how specific gut microbiota can support early monitoring and prevention of infertility in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The gut microbiota GWAS data included 18,340 individuals. Female infertility (6481 cases and 68,969 controls) and male infertility data (680 cases and 72,799 controls) were obtained from the FinnGen consortium. The inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median (WM), Cochran Q tests, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out were used as a supplement to Mendelian randomization (MR) results and sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of MR analysis indicated a significant causal association between Eubacterium oxidoreducens (OR = 2.048, <i>P</i> = 0.008), Lactococcus (OR = 1.445, <i>P</i> = 0.042), Eubacterium ventriosum (OR = 0.436, <i>P</i> = 0.018), Eubacterium rectale (OR = 0.306, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 (OR = 0.537, <i>P</i> = 0.045) and male infertility. Genetically predicted Eubacterium ventriosum (OR = 0.809, <i>P</i> = 0.018), Holdemania (OR = 0.836, <i>P</i> = 0.037), Lactococcus (OR = 0.867, <i>P</i> = 0.020), Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 (OR = 0.830, <i>P</i> < 0.050), Ruminococcus torques (OR = 0.739, <i>P</i> = 0.022), and Faecalibacterium (OR = 1.311, <i>P</i> = 0.007) were associated with female infertility. Sensitivity analysis did not detect heterogeneity and pleiotropy (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results provided evidence for the causal relationship between some gut microbiota and male and female infertility. These findings might be valuable in providing personalized treatment options for preventing infertility and improving reproductive function by monitoring and regulating the gut microbiota of infertility patients in the context of PPPM. Moreover, detecting the abundance of microbiota in feces can support preventive and personalized strategies, which may benefit more infertility patients.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-023-00332-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":54292,"journal":{"name":"Epma Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10439866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epma Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-023-00332-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Several studies have reported the association between gut microbiota and infertility; however, the causal association between them remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the causal relationship between gut microbiota and infertility and evaluate how specific gut microbiota can support early monitoring and prevention of infertility in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM).

Methods: The gut microbiota GWAS data included 18,340 individuals. Female infertility (6481 cases and 68,969 controls) and male infertility data (680 cases and 72,799 controls) were obtained from the FinnGen consortium. The inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median (WM), Cochran Q tests, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out were used as a supplement to Mendelian randomization (MR) results and sensitivity analysis.

Results: The results of MR analysis indicated a significant causal association between Eubacterium oxidoreducens (OR = 2.048, P = 0.008), Lactococcus (OR = 1.445, P = 0.042), Eubacterium ventriosum (OR = 0.436, P = 0.018), Eubacterium rectale (OR = 0.306, P = 0.002), and Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 (OR = 0.537, P = 0.045) and male infertility. Genetically predicted Eubacterium ventriosum (OR = 0.809, P = 0.018), Holdemania (OR = 0.836, P = 0.037), Lactococcus (OR = 0.867, P = 0.020), Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 (OR = 0.830, P < 0.050), Ruminococcus torques (OR = 0.739, P = 0.022), and Faecalibacterium (OR = 1.311, P = 0.007) were associated with female infertility. Sensitivity analysis did not detect heterogeneity and pleiotropy (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Our results provided evidence for the causal relationship between some gut microbiota and male and female infertility. These findings might be valuable in providing personalized treatment options for preventing infertility and improving reproductive function by monitoring and regulating the gut microbiota of infertility patients in the context of PPPM. Moreover, detecting the abundance of microbiota in feces can support preventive and personalized strategies, which may benefit more infertility patients.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-023-00332-6.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因预测肠道微生物群与不孕之间的因果关系:在预测、预防和个性化医学框架下的双向孟德尔随机化分析。
目的:一些研究报道了肠道微生物群与不孕之间的关系;然而,它们之间的因果关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探索肠道微生物群与不孕不育之间的因果关系,并评估特定的肠道微生物群如何在预测、预防和个性化医学(PPPM/3PM)的背景下支持不孕不育的早期监测和预防。方法:肠道微生物群GWAS数据包括18340名个体。女性不育(6481例和68969例对照)和男性不育数据(680例和72799例对照)来自FinnGen联盟。反方差加权(IVW)、MR-Egger、加权中位数(WM)、Cochran Q检验、MR-PRESSO和留一检验被用作孟德尔随机化(MR)结果和敏感性分析的补充。结果:MR分析结果表明氧化真杆菌(OR = 2.048,P = 0.008),乳球菌(或 = 1.445,P = 0.042)、腹氏真杆菌(OR = 0.436,P = 0.018)、直肠真杆菌(OR = 0.306,P = 0.002)和瘤胃球菌科NK4A214(OR = 0.537,P = 0.045)和男性不育。基因预测的腹足真杆菌(OR = 0.809,P = 0.018),Holdemania(OR = 0.836,P = 0.037),乳球菌(或 = 0.867,P = 0.020)、瘤胃球菌科NK4A214(OR = 0.830,P P = 0.022)和粪杆菌(OR = 1.311,P = 0.007)与女性不育有关。敏感性分析未发现异质性和多效性(P > 结论:我们的研究结果为某些肠道微生物群与男性和女性不孕之间的因果关系提供了证据。这些发现可能有助于通过监测和调节PPPM背景下不孕患者的肠道微生物群,为预防不孕和改善生殖功能提供个性化的治疗选择。此外,检测粪便中微生物群的丰度可以支持预防性和个性化策略,这可能使更多不孕不育患者受益。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s13167-023-00332-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epma Journal
Epma Journal Medicine-Biochemistry (medical)
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
23.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: PMA Journal is a journal of predictive, preventive and personalized medicine (PPPM). The journal provides expert viewpoints and research on medical innovations and advanced healthcare using predictive diagnostics, targeted preventive measures and personalized patient treatments. The journal is indexed by PubMed, Embase and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
Resveratrol: potential application in safeguarding testicular health Application of ChatGPT-4 to oculomics: a cost-effective osteoporosis risk assessment to enhance management as a proof-of-principles model in 3PM Association of the weight-adjusted waist index with hypertension in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine The caregiving role influences Suboptimal Health Status and psychological symptoms in unpaid carers Liver function maximum capacity test during normothermic regional perfusion predicts graft function after transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1