Prospective Meta-analysis of Weight Loss Regained and Success Rate of Argon Plasma Coagulation to Suture and Surgery Procedures Post-bariatric Surgery: Status of the Art of Endoscopic Treatment.

IF 1.4 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Reviews on recent clinical trials Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1574887118666230822110724
Idiberto José Zotarelli-Filho, Luiz Gustavo de Quadros, Manoel Galvão Neto, Samadhi W Rajapaksa, Janaki Vidanapathirana, Durval Ribas Filho, Carlos Alberto Nogueira-de-Almeida
{"title":"Prospective Meta-analysis of Weight Loss Regained and Success Rate of Argon Plasma Coagulation to Suture and Surgery Procedures Post-bariatric Surgery: Status of the Art of Endoscopic Treatment.","authors":"Idiberto José Zotarelli-Filho, Luiz Gustavo de Quadros, Manoel Galvão Neto, Samadhi W Rajapaksa, Janaki Vidanapathirana, Durval Ribas Filho, Carlos Alberto Nogueira-de-Almeida","doi":"10.2174/1574887118666230822110724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) concerning suture (SUT) and surgery (SUR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The One-Way tests were applied, with p <0.05 significant. The value of R2 was analyzed (heterogeneity), and the risk of bias of articles was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 studies were found, eight about APC, twenty about SUT, and six about SUR. For the percentage of Weight Loss Regained (%WLR), the means for APC, SUT, and SUR were 19.39 ± 10.94, 26.06 ± 16.71, and 17.05 ± 9.85, and for success rate (%SR), the means were 89.75 ± 16.75, 86.80 ± 11.44, and 76.00 ± 21.57, respectively with p >0.05, with R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The APC proved to be efficient and safe like the other techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":21174,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574887118666230822110724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) concerning suture (SUT) and surgery (SUR).

Methods: The One-Way tests were applied, with p <0.05 significant. The value of R2 was analyzed (heterogeneity), and the risk of bias of articles was evaluated.

Results: A total of 34 studies were found, eight about APC, twenty about SUT, and six about SUR. For the percentage of Weight Loss Regained (%WLR), the means for APC, SUT, and SUR were 19.39 ± 10.94, 26.06 ± 16.71, and 17.05 ± 9.85, and for success rate (%SR), the means were 89.75 ± 16.75, 86.80 ± 11.44, and 76.00 ± 21.57, respectively with p >0.05, with R2 ≥ 50%.

Conclusion: The APC proved to be efficient and safe like the other techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氩等离子体凝固术对减肥手术后缝合和手术程序的体重恢复和成功率的前瞻性 Meta 分析:内窥镜治疗艺术的现状。
背景:本研究通过荟萃分析比较了氩等离子体凝固术(APC)对缝合(SUT)和手术(SUR)的安全性和有效性:本研究进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较氩等离子体凝固(APC)对缝合(SUT)和手术(SUR)的安全性和有效性:方法: 采用单向检验,P 结果:共找到 34 项研究,其中 8 项关于 APC,20 项关于 SUT,6 项关于 SUR。在体重减轻恢复百分比(%WLR)方面,APC、SUT 和 SUR 的平均值分别为 19.39 ± 10.94、26.06 ± 16.71 和 17.05 ± 9.85,在成功率(%SR)方面,平均值分别为 89.75 ± 16.75、86.80 ± 11.44 和 76.00 ± 21.57,P>0.05,R2≥50%:事实证明,APC 与其他技术一样高效、安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews on recent clinical trials
Reviews on recent clinical trials PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials publishes frontier reviews on recent clinical trials of major importance. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: important Phase I – IV clinical trial studies, clinical investigations at all stages of development and therapeutics. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug therapy and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Impact Fertility: A Review. The Effect of Foot Reflexology on the Sexual Function of Lactating Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Critical Analysis of Non-profit Clinical Trials: Three Years of Activity at the Clinical Trials Office. Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for the Treatment of Leak after Oncologic Gastroesophageal Surgery: A Cohort Study. From Paper to Digital: Evaluating Electronic Medical Records and their Compliance with EMA Guidelines in European Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1