Factors associated with suboptimal complementary feeding practices among mothers of infants and young children in India.

Adejoke M Idowu, Gbenga A Kayode, Victor T Adekanmbi
{"title":"Factors associated with suboptimal complementary feeding practices among mothers of infants and young children in India.","authors":"Adejoke M Idowu,&nbsp;Gbenga A Kayode,&nbsp;Victor T Adekanmbi","doi":"10.32394/rpzh.2022.0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the current complementary feeding practices among infants and young children aged 6 to 23 months in India, and factors influencing these practices at child, parental, household and community levels.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data on 74,095 last-born children aged 6 to 23 months used in this study were obtained from the 2015 India Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS). Complementary feeding indicators (timely introduction of complementary foods to infants aged 6 to 8 months old, minimum meal frequency, minimum dietary diversity, and minimum acceptable diets) were estimated, and their associated factors were identified using descriptive and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of the timely introduction of complementary foods to infants aged 6 to 8 months was 45.1%. The proportion of children between ages 6 to 23 months who received the minimum meal frequency, minimum dietary diversity and minimum acceptable diets were 36%, 21% and 9.1%, respectively. Findings from the multivariate analyses revealed that mothers of infants delivered at home, mothers who had no antenatal check-up, mothers who are Hindus, mothers living in rural areas or those from the Western/Northern geographical regions of India were at higher risk of suboptimal complementary feeding practices.</p><p><p>Conclusions. Our findings indicate that, among other factors, achieving the recommended four or more antenatal visits was consistently associated with improved complementary feeding practices. Thus, policies that ensure increased coverage and quality of antenatal check-up could improve complementary feeding practices of mothers in India, and help towards achieving sustainable development goal 2, targeted at eradicating hunger and malnutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":35951,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32394/rpzh.2022.0234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the current complementary feeding practices among infants and young children aged 6 to 23 months in India, and factors influencing these practices at child, parental, household and community levels.

Material and methods: Data on 74,095 last-born children aged 6 to 23 months used in this study were obtained from the 2015 India Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS). Complementary feeding indicators (timely introduction of complementary foods to infants aged 6 to 8 months old, minimum meal frequency, minimum dietary diversity, and minimum acceptable diets) were estimated, and their associated factors were identified using descriptive and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses.

Results: The prevalence of the timely introduction of complementary foods to infants aged 6 to 8 months was 45.1%. The proportion of children between ages 6 to 23 months who received the minimum meal frequency, minimum dietary diversity and minimum acceptable diets were 36%, 21% and 9.1%, respectively. Findings from the multivariate analyses revealed that mothers of infants delivered at home, mothers who had no antenatal check-up, mothers who are Hindus, mothers living in rural areas or those from the Western/Northern geographical regions of India were at higher risk of suboptimal complementary feeding practices.

Conclusions. Our findings indicate that, among other factors, achieving the recommended four or more antenatal visits was consistently associated with improved complementary feeding practices. Thus, policies that ensure increased coverage and quality of antenatal check-up could improve complementary feeding practices of mothers in India, and help towards achieving sustainable development goal 2, targeted at eradicating hunger and malnutrition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与印度婴幼儿母亲辅食实践不理想相关的因素。
目的:研究目前印度6至23个月婴幼儿的补充喂养做法,以及在儿童、父母、家庭和社区层面影响这些做法的因素。材料和方法:本研究中使用的74,095名最后出生的6至23个月儿童的数据来自2015年印度人口与健康调查(IDHS)。对补充喂养指标(及时向6至8个月大的婴儿引入辅食、最低用餐频率、最低膳食多样性和最低可接受饮食)进行了估计,并使用描述性和多变量(logistic回归)分析确定了其相关因素。结果:6 ~ 8月龄婴幼儿及时引入辅食的比例为45.1%。6 - 23月龄儿童接受最低进餐频率、最低膳食多样性和最低可接受膳食的比例分别为36%、21%和9.1%。多变量分析的结果显示,在家分娩婴儿的母亲、没有进行产前检查的母亲、印度教徒的母亲、生活在农村地区的母亲或来自印度西部/北部地理区域的母亲,辅食实践不理想的风险更高。我们的研究结果表明,除其他因素外,实现推荐的四次或更多产前检查始终与改进的补充喂养方法相关。因此,确保提高产前检查覆盖率和质量的政策可以改善印度母亲的补充喂养做法,并有助于实现旨在消除饥饿和营养不良的可持续发展目标2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny
Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial activities of essential oils of plants species from Morocco against some microbial strains. Application of haloinhalations at the sanatorium-resort stage of rehabilitation of patients after COVID-19. Evaluation of phenolic content in selected red fruit juices. Frequency of consumption of selected foods by people with acne vulgaris. Hepatitis B: A Pilot study on awareness and attitude among staff nurses and students of a teaching hospital in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1