A survey of barriers and facilitators to caffeine use for apnoea of prematurity in low- and middle-income countries.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Paediatrics and International Child Health Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938
Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng
{"title":"A survey of barriers and facilitators to caffeine use for apnoea of prematurity in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng","doi":"10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.</p>","PeriodicalId":19731,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrics and International Child Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrics and International Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

Aim: To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.

Methods: An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.

Results: A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.

Conclusion: Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.

Abbreviations: AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于中低收入国家早产儿窒息症咖啡因使用障碍和促进因素的调查。
背景:尽管咖啡因的相关益处包括更好的长期肺部和神经发育结果,但在中低收入国家(LMIC),咖啡因治疗早产儿呼吸暂停(AoP)的使用受到限制。目的:为了更好地了解目前咖啡因的使用情况,在LMIC中使用它的障碍和促进因素,以及对早产负担过高的看法和做法。方法:以在LMIC从事儿科和/或新生儿科工作和培训的医疗保健提供者为对象,进行了一项匿名的在线全球调查。结果:共有16个LMIC的181名受访者被纳入分析;大多数是在公立城市三级医院工作的医生。大多数人接受过咖啡因用于AoP的培训(77%),报告了其使用的专业知识(70%)和信心(96%),并获得了咖啡因(65%)。据报道,咖啡因的可用性是最大的障碍(48%)和最大的促进因素(37%)。其他常见的障碍包括成本(31%)、获取(7%)和咖啡因使用政策或指南(7%);其他常见的促进者包括关于咖啡因使用(11%)、获取(10%)、工作人员/其他提供者接受咖啡因作为适当治疗的政策或指南(9%)以及工作人员管理咖啡因的可用性(8%)。大多数人(79%)认为摄入咖啡因很重要,92%的人认为咖啡因可以提高护理质量,95%的人认为咖啡可以改善患者的预后。结论:改善低成本咖啡因的供应和获取将是增加LMIC中咖啡因使用的关键;LMIC:中低收入国家;REDCap:研究电子数据捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Paediatrics and International Child Health is an international forum for all aspects of paediatrics and child health in developing and low-income countries. The international, peer-reviewed papers cover a wide range of diseases in childhood and examine the social and cultural settings in which they occur. Although the main aim is to enable authors in developing and low-income countries to publish internationally, it also accepts relevant papers from industrialised countries. The journal is a key publication for all with an interest in paediatric health in low-resource settings.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and laboratory profile and outcome in children with Wilson disease: an observational study in South India. Vitamin D deficiency and associated demographic risk factors in children at a tertiary hospital in Abu Dhabi. A 7-year-old boy with scurvy owing to coeliac disease. Nitrous oxide-induced myeloneuropathy in a Thai adolescent: a case report. Pulmonary tuberculosis in two preterm infants conceived by in vitro fertilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1