{"title":"Mapping the health science librarianship research field in 2012-2022.","authors":"Vinson Li","doi":"10.29173/jchla29626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence-based practice is an important aspect of health science librarianship. However, good evidence-based practice can only occur if the body of evidence is also of adequate quality. By using bibliometric techniques to map the health science librarianship research field, one can better understand the properties of the evidence base in health science librarianship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Library Literature & Information Science Full Text database was used to generate a bibliography of publications pertaining to health librarianship limited to the time span of 2012-2022. Using Excel and Microsoft Power BI, a descriptive analysis was conducted. VosViewer was used to create a subject term co-occurrence map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of publications per year is 207.3 and it was trending downwards for 2012-2022. The most frequently assigned subject term was \"survey\". The average number of authors per paper is 2.5 and was trending upwards. The subject term co-occurrence map identified 5 clusters of keywords, which were interpreted as major themes found in the body of literature.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The 5 keyword clusters were interpreted as major themes found in the body of literature. The identified themes were professional development, measuring the value output of librarian services, measuring the return on investment of library resources, improving the quality of LIS research, and outreach to other library and healthcare institutions. This depicts the health science librarianship research landscape as one of collaboration, concerned with finding ways of demonstrating value, and connecting with other types of libraries and the public.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9725973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence-based practice is an important aspect of health science librarianship. However, good evidence-based practice can only occur if the body of evidence is also of adequate quality. By using bibliometric techniques to map the health science librarianship research field, one can better understand the properties of the evidence base in health science librarianship.
Methods: The Library Literature & Information Science Full Text database was used to generate a bibliography of publications pertaining to health librarianship limited to the time span of 2012-2022. Using Excel and Microsoft Power BI, a descriptive analysis was conducted. VosViewer was used to create a subject term co-occurrence map.
Results: The average number of publications per year is 207.3 and it was trending downwards for 2012-2022. The most frequently assigned subject term was "survey". The average number of authors per paper is 2.5 and was trending upwards. The subject term co-occurrence map identified 5 clusters of keywords, which were interpreted as major themes found in the body of literature.
Discussion: The 5 keyword clusters were interpreted as major themes found in the body of literature. The identified themes were professional development, measuring the value output of librarian services, measuring the return on investment of library resources, improving the quality of LIS research, and outreach to other library and healthcare institutions. This depicts the health science librarianship research landscape as one of collaboration, concerned with finding ways of demonstrating value, and connecting with other types of libraries and the public.
导论:循证实践是卫生科学图书馆工作的一个重要方面。然而,良好的循证实践只有在证据体也具有足够质量的情况下才能发生。利用文献计量学技术绘制卫生学图书馆学研究领域图谱,可以更好地了解卫生学图书馆学证据库的性质。方法:利用图书馆文献与情报学全文数据库生成2012-2022年卫生图书馆学相关出版物的参考书目。使用Excel和Microsoft Power BI进行描述性分析。使用VosViewer创建主题词共现图。结果:2012-2022年平均年发表数为207.3篇,呈下降趋势。最常被指定的主题词是“调查”。每篇论文的平均作者数为2.5人,并且呈上升趋势。主题词共现图确定了5组关键词,这些关键词被解释为文献主体中的主要主题。讨论:将这5个关键词集群解释为文学主体中的主要主题。确定的主题是专业发展,衡量图书馆员服务的价值产出,衡量图书馆资源的投资回报,提高LIS研究的质量,以及向其他图书馆和医疗机构的推广。这将健康科学图书馆研究描绘为一种合作,关注寻找展示价值的方法,并与其他类型的图书馆和公众建立联系。