Design Judgments in the Creation of eLearning Modules.

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of formative design in learning Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3
Tadd Farmer, Adrie Koehler
{"title":"Design Judgments in the Creation of eLearning Modules.","authors":"Tadd Farmer,&nbsp;Adrie Koehler","doi":"10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As eLearning becomes an increasingly common strategy to minimize instructional disruptions caused by illness, weather, professional development, and other planned and unplanned events, teachers need to gain the knowledge and skills necessary to design and facilitate these non-traditional learning experiences. Informed by survey and interview data, we developed three learning modules designed to assist PK-12 teachers in preparing, planning, and facilitating eLearning experiences. In describing this design process, we focus this case on design judgments, described here as the deliberate and unconscious thinking processes experienced by designers in the design and development of learning experiences. Through this experience, we found that design judgments occur constantly throughout the design process and manifest themselves in non-linear and sometimes unpredictable ways. With this focus on design judgments, we aim to provide a view of instructional design that can sensitize designers to the complexities of authentic design experience.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":73753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of formative design in learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791083/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of formative design in learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As eLearning becomes an increasingly common strategy to minimize instructional disruptions caused by illness, weather, professional development, and other planned and unplanned events, teachers need to gain the knowledge and skills necessary to design and facilitate these non-traditional learning experiences. Informed by survey and interview data, we developed three learning modules designed to assist PK-12 teachers in preparing, planning, and facilitating eLearning experiences. In describing this design process, we focus this case on design judgments, described here as the deliberate and unconscious thinking processes experienced by designers in the design and development of learning experiences. Through this experience, we found that design judgments occur constantly throughout the design process and manifest themselves in non-linear and sometimes unpredictable ways. With this focus on design judgments, we aim to provide a view of instructional design that can sensitize designers to the complexities of authentic design experience.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子学习模块创建中的设计判断。
随着电子学习成为一种越来越普遍的策略,以尽量减少因疾病、天气、专业发展和其他计划内或计划外事件造成的教学中断,教师需要获得必要的知识和技能来设计和促进这些非传统的学习体验。根据调查和访谈数据,我们开发了三个学习模块,旨在帮助PK-12教师准备,计划和促进在线学习体验。在描述这个设计过程时,我们将这个案例的重点放在了设计判断上,这里将其描述为设计师在设计和开发学习经验中所经历的刻意和无意识的思考过程。通过这次经历,我们发现设计判断在整个设计过程中不断发生,并以非线性和有时不可预测的方式表现出来。通过对设计判断的关注,我们的目标是提供一种教学设计的观点,使设计师对真实设计体验的复杂性敏感。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of QR Codes to Enhance Learning in a Graduate-Level Clinical Course Secondary School Teachers’ Use of Formative Assessment Practice to Create Co-regulated Learning Design, Development, and Formative Evaluation of a Hybrid Remote Quantum Laboratory Supporting HBCU Partnerships Correction: Faculty in Action: Researching a Community of Practice Approach to Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment How Do We Flip Our Language Classroom? Reassessing the Flipped Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1