Sexual risk behaviour among school-going adolescents in Sierra Leone and Liberia: a secondary analysis of the 2017 Global school-based student health surveys.

Peter Bai James, Augustus Osborne, Abdulai Jawo Bah, Emmanuel Kamanda Margao, Mohamed Conteh-Barrat
{"title":"Sexual risk behaviour among school-going adolescents in Sierra Leone and Liberia: a secondary analysis of the 2017 Global school-based student health surveys.","authors":"Peter Bai James,&nbsp;Augustus Osborne,&nbsp;Abdulai Jawo Bah,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kamanda Margao,&nbsp;Mohamed Conteh-Barrat","doi":"10.1186/s40834-022-00193-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sierra Leone and Liberia have experienced civil wars and, recently, Ebola outbreaks that led to profound economic hardship, psychopathologies and family disruptions. These factors are associated with sexual risk behaviours among youths. However, there is very little information on sexual risk behaviour among Sierra Leonean and Liberian school-going adolescents. The present study assessed the prevalence and determinants of sexual risk behaviours among school-going adolescents (10-19 years) in Sierra Leone and Liberia.  METHOD: We used publicly available nationally representative cross-sectional datasets of the 2017 Sierra Leone and Liberia Global school health survey. The sample consisted of 2798 and 2744 school-going adolescents from Sierra Leone and Liberia, respectively. Complex sample descriptive and regression analysis was used to analyse our data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of adolescents in the two countries were involved in multiple sexual risk behaviour (80.2%), with a higher prevalence observed in Sierra Leone (85.2%) than in Liberia (75.3%). Liberian adolescents showed lesser odds of indulging in multiple sexual risk behaviours than their Sierra Leonean counterparts (AOR = 0.572; 95%CI: 0.345-0.946). Male, compared to females, were more likely to engage in multiple sexual risk behaviour (AOR = 2.310;95%CI:1.543-3.458), with a similar pattern observed in both countries. Alcohol use was associated with multiple sexual risk behaviour (AOR = 3.064; 95%CI: 2.137-4.392). Also, in Sierra Leone and Liberia, adolescents with one and two or more forms of psychological distress were more likely to have ever had sex than those who did not show any form of psychological distress. Missing class/school was associated with multiple sexual risk behaviour (AOR = 1.655; 95%CI:1.133-2.418). Peer support was only found to be a protective factor against no condom use among Liberian adolescents (AOR = 0.608; 95%CI: 0.435-0.850). Less parental support was only associated with ever had sex among adolescents in Sierra Leone (AOR = 2.027; 95%CI: 1.322-3.107) but not in Liberia (AOR = 1.034; 95%CI: 0.650-1.644).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found a high sexual risk behaviour among school-going adolescents in Sierra Leone and Liberia. Our finding highlights the need to strengthen sexual and reproductive health education in schools and communities that incorporate mental health promotion activities tailored to this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":10637,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00193-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sierra Leone and Liberia have experienced civil wars and, recently, Ebola outbreaks that led to profound economic hardship, psychopathologies and family disruptions. These factors are associated with sexual risk behaviours among youths. However, there is very little information on sexual risk behaviour among Sierra Leonean and Liberian school-going adolescents. The present study assessed the prevalence and determinants of sexual risk behaviours among school-going adolescents (10-19 years) in Sierra Leone and Liberia.  METHOD: We used publicly available nationally representative cross-sectional datasets of the 2017 Sierra Leone and Liberia Global school health survey. The sample consisted of 2798 and 2744 school-going adolescents from Sierra Leone and Liberia, respectively. Complex sample descriptive and regression analysis was used to analyse our data.

Results: The majority of adolescents in the two countries were involved in multiple sexual risk behaviour (80.2%), with a higher prevalence observed in Sierra Leone (85.2%) than in Liberia (75.3%). Liberian adolescents showed lesser odds of indulging in multiple sexual risk behaviours than their Sierra Leonean counterparts (AOR = 0.572; 95%CI: 0.345-0.946). Male, compared to females, were more likely to engage in multiple sexual risk behaviour (AOR = 2.310;95%CI:1.543-3.458), with a similar pattern observed in both countries. Alcohol use was associated with multiple sexual risk behaviour (AOR = 3.064; 95%CI: 2.137-4.392). Also, in Sierra Leone and Liberia, adolescents with one and two or more forms of psychological distress were more likely to have ever had sex than those who did not show any form of psychological distress. Missing class/school was associated with multiple sexual risk behaviour (AOR = 1.655; 95%CI:1.133-2.418). Peer support was only found to be a protective factor against no condom use among Liberian adolescents (AOR = 0.608; 95%CI: 0.435-0.850). Less parental support was only associated with ever had sex among adolescents in Sierra Leone (AOR = 2.027; 95%CI: 1.322-3.107) but not in Liberia (AOR = 1.034; 95%CI: 0.650-1.644).

Conclusion: Our study found a high sexual risk behaviour among school-going adolescents in Sierra Leone and Liberia. Our finding highlights the need to strengthen sexual and reproductive health education in schools and communities that incorporate mental health promotion activities tailored to this group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞拉利昂和利比里亚学龄青少年的性风险行为:对2017年全球校本学生健康调查的二次分析
背景:塞拉利昂和利比里亚经历了内战,最近又爆发了埃博拉疫情,导致严重的经济困难、精神疾病和家庭破裂。这些因素与青少年的性危险行为有关。然而,关于塞拉利昂和利比里亚学龄青少年的性危险行为的信息很少。本研究评估了塞拉利昂和利比里亚学龄青少年(10-19岁)性危险行为的流行程度和决定因素。方法:我们使用了2017年塞拉利昂和利比里亚全球学校健康调查中公开的具有全国代表性的横截面数据集。样本分别由来自塞拉利昂和利比里亚的2798名和2744名在校青少年组成。采用复样本描述性和回归分析对数据进行分析。结果:这两个国家的大多数青少年都有多个性危险行为(80.2%),其中塞拉利昂的患病率(85.2%)高于利比里亚(75.3%)。利比里亚青少年沉溺于多重性危险行为的几率低于塞拉利昂青少年(AOR = 0.572;95%置信区间:0.345—-0.946)。与女性相比,男性更有可能从事多重性风险行为(AOR = 2.310;95%CI:1.543-3.458),两国的模式相似。饮酒与多重性危险行为相关(AOR = 3.064;95%置信区间:2.137—-4.392)。此外,在塞拉利昂和利比里亚,有一种、两种或两种以上心理困扰的青少年比没有任何心理困扰的青少年更有可能发生过性行为。缺课/失学与多重性危险行为相关(AOR = 1.655;95%置信区间:1.133—-2.418)。同伴支持仅被发现是防止利比里亚青少年不使用避孕套的保护因素(AOR = 0.608;95%置信区间:0.435—-0.850)。在塞拉利昂,父母支持较少只与青少年发生过性行为有关(AOR = 2.027;95%CI: 1.322-3.107),但利比里亚没有(AOR = 1.034;95%置信区间:0.650—-1.644)。结论:我们的研究发现,在塞拉利昂和利比里亚的学龄青少年中存在较高的性风险行为。我们的发现强调了在学校和社区加强性健康和生殖健康教育的必要性,这些教育包括针对这一群体的心理健康促进活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use among women in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis Male characteristics and contraception in four districts of the central region, Ghana. Postpartum family planning uptake in Uganda: findings from the lot quality assurance sampling survey. Assessing the sustainability of two independent voucher-based family planning programs in Pakistan: a 24-months post-intervention evaluation. Emergency contraceptive use of Metronidazole among University female students in Dodoma region of Tanzania: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1