Striatal reactivity during emotion and reward relates to approach-avoidance conflict behaviour and is altered in adults with anxiety or depression.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1503/jpn.220083
Timothy J McDermott, Hannah Berg, James Touthang, Elisabeth Akeman, Mallory J Cannon, Jessica Santiago, Kelly T Cosgrove, Ashley N Clausen, Namik Kirlic, Ryan Smith, Michelle G Craske, James L Abelson, Martin P Paulus, Robin L Aupperle
{"title":"Striatal reactivity during emotion and reward relates to approach-avoidance conflict behaviour and is altered in adults with anxiety or depression.","authors":"Timothy J McDermott, Hannah Berg, James Touthang, Elisabeth Akeman, Mallory J Cannon, Jessica Santiago, Kelly T Cosgrove, Ashley N Clausen, Namik Kirlic, Ryan Smith, Michelle G Craske, James L Abelson, Martin P Paulus, Robin L Aupperle","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We have previously reported activation in reward, salience and executive control regions during functional MRI (fMRI) using an approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) decision-making task with healthy adults. Further investigations into how anxiety and depressive disorders relate to differences in neural responses during AAC can inform their understanding and treatment. We tested the hypothesis that people with anxiety or depression have altered neural activation during AAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared 118 treatment-seeking adults with anxiety or depression and 58 healthy adults using linear mixed-effects models to examine group-level differences in neural activation (fMRI) during AAC decision-making. Correlational analyses examined relationships between behavioural and neural measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults with anxiety or depression had greater striatal engagement when reacting to affective stimuli (<i>p</i> = 0.008, <i>d</i> = 0.31) regardless of valence, and weaker striatal engagement during reward feedback (<i>p</i> = 0.046, <i>d</i> = -0.27) regardless of the presence of monetary reward. They also had blunted amygdala activity during decision-making (<i>p</i> = 0.023, <i>d</i> = -0.32) regardless of the presence of conflict. Across groups, approach behaviour during conflict decision-making was inversely correlated with striatal activation during affective stimuli (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = -0.28) and positively related to striatal activation during reward feedback (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our transdiagnostic approach did not allow for comparisons between specific anxiety disorders, and our cross-sectional approach did not allow for causal inference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anxiety and depression were associated with altered neural responses to AAC. Findings were consistent with the role of the striatum in action selection and reward responsivity, and they point toward striatal reactivity as a future treatment target. Blunting of amygdala activity in anxiety or depression may indicate a compensatory response to inhibit affective salience and maintain approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 5","pages":"E311-E322"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/17/47-5-E311.PMC9448414.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We have previously reported activation in reward, salience and executive control regions during functional MRI (fMRI) using an approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) decision-making task with healthy adults. Further investigations into how anxiety and depressive disorders relate to differences in neural responses during AAC can inform their understanding and treatment. We tested the hypothesis that people with anxiety or depression have altered neural activation during AAC.

Methods: We compared 118 treatment-seeking adults with anxiety or depression and 58 healthy adults using linear mixed-effects models to examine group-level differences in neural activation (fMRI) during AAC decision-making. Correlational analyses examined relationships between behavioural and neural measures.

Results: Adults with anxiety or depression had greater striatal engagement when reacting to affective stimuli (p = 0.008, d = 0.31) regardless of valence, and weaker striatal engagement during reward feedback (p = 0.046, d = -0.27) regardless of the presence of monetary reward. They also had blunted amygdala activity during decision-making (p = 0.023, d = -0.32) regardless of the presence of conflict. Across groups, approach behaviour during conflict decision-making was inversely correlated with striatal activation during affective stimuli (p < 0.001, r = -0.28) and positively related to striatal activation during reward feedback (p < 0.001, r = 0.27).

Limitations: Our transdiagnostic approach did not allow for comparisons between specific anxiety disorders, and our cross-sectional approach did not allow for causal inference.

Conclusion: Anxiety and depression were associated with altered neural responses to AAC. Findings were consistent with the role of the striatum in action selection and reward responsivity, and they point toward striatal reactivity as a future treatment target. Blunting of amygdala activity in anxiety or depression may indicate a compensatory response to inhibit affective salience and maintain approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪和奖赏期间的纹状体反应与接近-回避冲突行为有关,在患有焦虑症或抑郁症的成年人身上会发生改变。
背景:我们以前曾报道过健康成年人在使用接近-回避冲突(AAC)决策任务时,在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)中奖励、显著性和执行控制区域的激活情况。进一步研究焦虑症和抑郁症与 AAC 过程中神经反应差异的关系,可为了解和治疗焦虑症和抑郁症提供参考。我们测试了焦虑症或抑郁症患者在 AAC 过程中神经激活发生改变的假设:我们使用线性混合效应模型对 118 名寻求治疗的焦虑症或抑郁症成人和 58 名健康成人进行了比较,以研究 AAC 决策过程中神经激活(fMRI)的群体水平差异。相关分析检验了行为和神经测量之间的关系:结果:焦虑或抑郁的成年人在对情感刺激做出反应时,纹状体的参与度更高(p = 0.008,d = 0.31),而与价值无关;在奖励反馈时,纹状体的参与度较弱(p = 0.046,d = -0.27),而与是否存在金钱奖励无关。在决策过程中,无论是否存在冲突,他们的杏仁核活动也会减弱(p = 0.023,d = -0.32)。在各组中,冲突决策期间的接近行为与情感刺激期间的纹状体激活呈反向相关(p < 0.001,r = -0.28),与奖励反馈期间的纹状体激活呈正向相关(p < 0.001,r = 0.27):局限性:我们的跨诊断方法无法对特定焦虑症进行比较,我们的横断面方法也无法进行因果推断:焦虑和抑郁与对 AAC 神经反应的改变有关。研究结果与纹状体在行动选择和奖赏反应中的作用一致,并指出纹状体反应性是未来的治疗目标。焦虑症或抑郁症患者杏仁核活动的减弱可能是抑制情感显著性和保持接近的一种补偿反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Decreased temporal variabilities of functional connectivities in insula and lingual gyrus are associated with better early treatment response in patients with panic disorder. Glutamate levels and symptom burden in high-risk and first-episode schizophrenia: a dual-voxel study of the anterior cingulate cortex. Altered neural activities during emotion regulation in depression: a meta-analysis. Beyond mood - depression as a speed disorder: biomarkers for abnormal slowness. Structural-informed functional MRI analysis of patients with empathy impairment following stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1