Medicaid Expansion and Veterans' Reliance on the VA for Depression Care.

Daniel Liaou, Patrick N O'Mahen, Laura A Petersen
{"title":"Medicaid Expansion and Veterans' Reliance on the VA for Depression Care.","authors":"Daniel Liaou,&nbsp;Patrick N O'Mahen,&nbsp;Laura A Petersen","doi":"10.12788/fp.0330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2001, before the Affordable Care Act (ACA), some states expanded Medicaid coverage to include an array of mental health services, changing veterans' reliance on US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Medicaid and VA administrative data from 1999 to 2006, we used a difference-in-difference design to calculate shifts in veterans' reliance on the VA for depression care in New York and Arizona after the 2 states expanded Medicaid coverage to adults in 2001. Demographically matched, neighbor states Pennsylvania and New Mexico/Nevada were used as paired comparisons, respectively. Fractional logit was used to capture the distribution of inpatient and outpatient depression care utilization between the VA and Medicaid, while ordered logit and negative binomial regressions were applied to model Medicaid-VA dual users and per capita utilization of total depression care services, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medicaid expansion was associated with a 9.50 percentage point (pp) decrease (95% CI, -14.61 to -4.38) in reliance on the VA for inpatient depression care among service-connected veterans and a 13.37 pp decrease (95% CI, -21.12 to -5.61) among income-eligible veterans. For outpatient depression care, VA reliance decreased by 2.19 pp (95% CI, -3.46 to -0.93) among income-eligible veterans. Changes among service-connected veterans were nonsignificant (-0.60 pp; 95% CI, -1.40 to 0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After Medicaid expansion, veterans shifted depression care away from the VA, with effects varying by health care setting, income- vs service-related eligibility, and state of residence. Issues of overall cost, care coordination, and clinical outcomes deserve further study in the ACA era of Medicaid expansions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"39 11","pages":"436-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794172/pdf/fp-39-11-436.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2001, before the Affordable Care Act (ACA), some states expanded Medicaid coverage to include an array of mental health services, changing veterans' reliance on US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) services.

Methods: Using Medicaid and VA administrative data from 1999 to 2006, we used a difference-in-difference design to calculate shifts in veterans' reliance on the VA for depression care in New York and Arizona after the 2 states expanded Medicaid coverage to adults in 2001. Demographically matched, neighbor states Pennsylvania and New Mexico/Nevada were used as paired comparisons, respectively. Fractional logit was used to capture the distribution of inpatient and outpatient depression care utilization between the VA and Medicaid, while ordered logit and negative binomial regressions were applied to model Medicaid-VA dual users and per capita utilization of total depression care services, respectively.

Results: Medicaid expansion was associated with a 9.50 percentage point (pp) decrease (95% CI, -14.61 to -4.38) in reliance on the VA for inpatient depression care among service-connected veterans and a 13.37 pp decrease (95% CI, -21.12 to -5.61) among income-eligible veterans. For outpatient depression care, VA reliance decreased by 2.19 pp (95% CI, -3.46 to -0.93) among income-eligible veterans. Changes among service-connected veterans were nonsignificant (-0.60 pp; 95% CI, -1.40 to 0.21).

Conclusions: After Medicaid expansion, veterans shifted depression care away from the VA, with effects varying by health care setting, income- vs service-related eligibility, and state of residence. Issues of overall cost, care coordination, and clinical outcomes deserve further study in the ACA era of Medicaid expansions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗补助扩张和退伍军人对退伍军人事务部抑郁症护理的依赖。
背景:2001年,在平价医疗法案(ACA)出台之前,一些州扩大了医疗补助的覆盖范围,将一系列心理健康服务纳入其中,改变了退伍军人对美国退伍军人事务部(VA)服务的依赖。方法:利用1999年至2006年的医疗补助和退伍军人管理局的管理数据,我们采用异差设计来计算纽约州和亚利桑那州在2001年将医疗补助扩大到成年人后,退伍军人对退伍军人管理局抑郁症护理的依赖变化。人口统计学上相匹配的是,邻近的宾夕法尼亚州和新墨西哥州/内华达州分别被用作配对比较。采用分数logit分析退伍军人和医疗补助之间住院和门诊抑郁症治疗利用的分布,采用有序logit和负二项回归分别对医疗补助-退伍军人双重使用者和人均总抑郁症治疗服务利用进行建模。结果:医疗补助扩张与服务相关退伍军人对退伍军人事务部抑郁症住院治疗依赖程度降低9.50个百分点(95% CI, -14.61至-4.38)相关,与收入合格退伍军人对退伍军人抑郁症住院治疗依赖程度降低13.37个百分点(95% CI, -21.12至-5.61)相关。对于门诊抑郁症治疗,在符合收入标准的退伍军人中,退伍军人事务部的依赖减少了2.19个百分点(95% CI, -3.46至-0.93)。与服务相关的退伍军人的变化不显著(-0.60 pp;95% CI, -1.40至0.21)。结论:在医疗补助扩大后,退伍军人将抑郁症护理从退伍军人事务部转移出去,其影响因医疗保健环境、收入与服务相关的资格和居住州而异。在医疗补助扩大的ACA时代,总体成本、护理协调和临床结果的问题值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Olfactory Hallucinations Following COVID-19 Vaccination. Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes by p16INK4a Antigen Status in a Veteran Population. Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis. Contralateral Constrictor Dose Predicts Swallowing Function After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer. Acute Painful Horner Syndrome as the First Presenting Sign of Carotid Artery Dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1