Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesiology intensive therapy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ait.2023.129276
Vaishnavi Bd, Shilpa Goyal, Ankur Sharma, Nikhil Kothari, Narendra Kaloria, Priyanka Sethi, Pradeep Bhatia
{"title":"Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial.","authors":"Vaishnavi Bd,&nbsp;Shilpa Goyal,&nbsp;Ankur Sharma,&nbsp;Nikhil Kothari,&nbsp;Narendra Kaloria,&nbsp;Priyanka Sethi,&nbsp;Pradeep Bhatia","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.129276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paediatric patients are a population with a high level of anxiety. The prevention of perioperative stress in a frightened child is important to render the child calm and cooperative for smoother induction. Intranasal premedication is easy and safe, and the drug is rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation, ensuring early onset of sedation in children and good effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>150 patients in the age group 2-4 years, ASA class I, undergoing elective surgical procedures were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: a DM group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 ), a DK group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and keta-mine 2 mg kg -1 ), and an MK group (receiving intranasal midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 and ketamine 2 mg kg -1 ). After 30 minutes of administration of the drugs, the patients were assessed for parent separation anxiety, sedation, ease of IV cannulation, and mask acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison among the 3 groups showed a statistically significant difference for ease of IV cannulation and mask acceptance at 30 minutes, with a P -value of 0.010 with CI of 0.0-0.02, and P -value 0.007 with CI 0.0-0.02, respectively. The parent separation anxiety and sedation score at 30 minutes was statistically insignificant with a P -value of 0.82 with CI of 0.03-0.14 and P -value 0.631 with CI of 0.38-0.58, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of midazolam and ketamine had a better clinical profile for premedication as compared to other combination drugs used in our study in terms of IV cannulation and acceptance of masks with a comparable decrease in separation anxiety from parents and adequate sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/00/AIT-55-51037.PMC10415598.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.129276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paediatric patients are a population with a high level of anxiety. The prevention of perioperative stress in a frightened child is important to render the child calm and cooperative for smoother induction. Intranasal premedication is easy and safe, and the drug is rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation, ensuring early onset of sedation in children and good effectiveness.

Methods: 150 patients in the age group 2-4 years, ASA class I, undergoing elective surgical procedures were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: a DM group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 ), a DK group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and keta-mine 2 mg kg -1 ), and an MK group (receiving intranasal midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 and ketamine 2 mg kg -1 ). After 30 minutes of administration of the drugs, the patients were assessed for parent separation anxiety, sedation, ease of IV cannulation, and mask acceptance.

Results: The comparison among the 3 groups showed a statistically significant difference for ease of IV cannulation and mask acceptance at 30 minutes, with a P -value of 0.010 with CI of 0.0-0.02, and P -value 0.007 with CI 0.0-0.02, respectively. The parent separation anxiety and sedation score at 30 minutes was statistically insignificant with a P -value of 0.82 with CI of 0.03-0.14 and P -value 0.631 with CI of 0.38-0.58, respectively.

Conclusions: The combination of midazolam and ketamine had a better clinical profile for premedication as compared to other combination drugs used in our study in terms of IV cannulation and acceptance of masks with a comparable decrease in separation anxiety from parents and adequate sedation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定-咪达唑仑、右美托咪定-氯胺酮和咪达唑仑-氯胺酮在儿科患者用药前的比较:一项双盲随机试验。
背景:儿科患者是一个焦虑水平较高的人群。预防围手术期的应激对受惊儿童的镇静和配合诱导是很重要的。鼻内预用药简便、安全,药物迅速被体循环吸收,确保儿童镇静起效早、效果好。方法:选取150例年龄2 ~ 4岁ASA I级择期手术患者。将患者随机分为3组:DM组(右美托咪定1µg kg -1,咪达唑仑0.12 mg kg -1), DK组(右美托咪定1µg kg -1,酮胺酮2 mg kg -1), MK组(咪达唑仑0.12 mg kg -1,氯胺酮2 mg kg -1)。给药30分钟后,评估患者的父母分离焦虑、镇静程度、静脉插管难易程度和口罩接受程度。结果:三组比较,30分钟静脉插管难易度和口罩接受度差异有统计学意义,P值分别为0.010,CI为0.0 ~ 0.02;P值分别为0.007,CI为0.0 ~ 0.02。30分钟父母分离焦虑和镇静评分P值为0.82,CI为0.03 ~ 0.14,P值为0.631,CI为0.38 ~ 0.58,差异均无统计学意义。结论:咪达唑仑与氯胺酮联用在用药前的临床表现优于本研究中使用的其他联用药物,在静脉插管和口罩接受方面,与父母分离焦虑的减少和足够的镇静程度相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial to compare blind intubation success through LMA Blockbuster® and I-Gel® LMA. Can't intubate, can't oxygenate? What is the preferred surgical strategy? A retrospective analysis. Measures of preoperative anxiety: Part two. Navigating through the paradox of choice: prediction of outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nutritional management in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1