Primary therapy of early breast cancer: Egyptian view of 2021 St. Gallen consensus.

Hussein Khaled, Yousry Wasef Nada, Kareem Mohamed Ramadan, Shawkat Fekry, Mohamed Samy Seleam, Rabab Gaafar, Mohamed Lotayef
{"title":"Primary therapy of early breast cancer: Egyptian view of 2021 St. Gallen consensus.","authors":"Hussein Khaled,&nbsp;Yousry Wasef Nada,&nbsp;Kareem Mohamed Ramadan,&nbsp;Shawkat Fekry,&nbsp;Mohamed Samy Seleam,&nbsp;Rabab Gaafar,&nbsp;Mohamed Lotayef","doi":"10.1186/s43046-022-00156-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The theme of the St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2021 held virtually for the first time, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, was on tailoring therapies for patients with early breast cancer. A monkey survey that included an Egyptian Panel voted on most of the questions of the original St. Gallen consensus, and some added new questions most relevant to oncology practice in the country, to be able to compare voting results that reflect differences in breast cancer management and decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The panel included 74 Egyptian scientists from different oncology specialties. Management issues including controversial diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were prepared by a small committee and then projected using the online monkey survey website: https://www.surveymonkey.com . The survey included 130 questions. Results were then analyzed, tabulated, and compared to the voting results of the original St. Gallen consensus.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Voting questions and resulting percentages of answers from the Egyptian panel were summarized. There was no consensus between the Egyptian and the original St. Gallen panels on 28/130 statements. They mostly included genetic and pathologic aspects, specifically the routine use of gene signature assays and a few queries involving surgical, radiotherapeutic, and systemic interventions. Probably, available resources and healthcare system differences in Egypt compared to European and the USA were the cause of these differences. This would also be applicable to other low- and low-middle-income healthcare scenarios present in many countries, especially with the present constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":17301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","volume":"34 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-022-00156-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The theme of the St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2021 held virtually for the first time, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, was on tailoring therapies for patients with early breast cancer. A monkey survey that included an Egyptian Panel voted on most of the questions of the original St. Gallen consensus, and some added new questions most relevant to oncology practice in the country, to be able to compare voting results that reflect differences in breast cancer management and decision making.

Methods: The panel included 74 Egyptian scientists from different oncology specialties. Management issues including controversial diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were prepared by a small committee and then projected using the online monkey survey website: https://www.surveymonkey.com . The survey included 130 questions. Results were then analyzed, tabulated, and compared to the voting results of the original St. Gallen consensus.

Results and conclusions: Voting questions and resulting percentages of answers from the Egyptian panel were summarized. There was no consensus between the Egyptian and the original St. Gallen panels on 28/130 statements. They mostly included genetic and pathologic aspects, specifically the routine use of gene signature assays and a few queries involving surgical, radiotherapeutic, and systemic interventions. Probably, available resources and healthcare system differences in Egypt compared to European and the USA were the cause of these differences. This would also be applicable to other low- and low-middle-income healthcare scenarios present in many countries, especially with the present constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期乳腺癌的主要治疗:埃及对2021年圣加仑共识的看法。
目的:由于COVID-19大流行,圣加仑国际乳腺癌会议2021首次以虚拟方式举行,主题是针对早期乳腺癌患者的量身定制治疗。一项猴子调查,包括一个埃及小组,对最初圣加仑共识的大多数问题进行了投票,并增加了一些与该国肿瘤实践最相关的新问题,以便能够比较反映乳腺癌管理和决策差异的投票结果。方法:专家组包括来自不同肿瘤学专业的74名埃及科学家。管理问题,包括有争议的诊断和治疗干预,是由一个小委员会准备的,然后通过在线猴子调查网站https://www.surveymonkey.com进行预测。调查包括130个问题。然后对结果进行分析、制表,并与最初的圣加仑共识投票结果进行比较。结果和结论:投票问题和结果百分比的回答从埃及小组总结。埃及小组和最初的圣加仑小组对28/130声明没有达成一致意见。它们主要包括遗传和病理方面,特别是常规使用的基因标记分析和一些涉及手术、放射治疗和系统干预的查询。可能,与欧洲和美国相比,埃及的可用资源和医疗系统差异是造成这些差异的原因。这也适用于许多国家存在的其他低收入和中低收入医疗保健方案,特别是在当前COVID-19大流行的限制下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, the Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute (JENCI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that publishes on the latest innovations in oncology and thereby, providing academics and clinicians a leading research platform. JENCI welcomes submissions pertaining to all fields of basic, applied and clinical cancer research. Main topics of interest include: local and systemic anticancer therapy (with specific interest on applied cancer research from developing countries); experimental oncology; early cancer detection; randomized trials (including negatives ones); and key emerging fields of personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, and biotechnologies.
期刊最新文献
Clinico-epidemiological and treatment factors impact on survival in Egyptian patients with head and neck sarcoma: a retrospective case-series analysis. Assessment of podocyte detachment as a pivotal step in the development of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Genomic strategies for drug repurposing. Bladder cancer: a retrospective audit at a single radiation oncology unit of an academic hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Practical immunomodulatory landscape of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1