Female caregivers' contextual complexities and familial power structures within Alzheimer's care.

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Women & Aging Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1080/08952841.2022.2130655
Candace C Harrington, Cheryl Dean-Witt, Pamela Z Cacchione
{"title":"Female caregivers' contextual complexities and familial power structures within Alzheimer's care.","authors":"Candace C Harrington,&nbsp;Cheryl Dean-Witt,&nbsp;Pamela Z Cacchione","doi":"10.1080/08952841.2022.2130655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, 11.3 million unpaid caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease/Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) provided 16 billion hours of unpaid caregiving worth $271.6 billion. This study aimed to fully capture the contextual complexities of the caregiving role acquisition articulated by female family caregivers of those with AD/ADRD, emphasizing assigned meaning to one's lived experience with a critical focus on how family power structures influence caregiving practices. Recorded open structured interview transcripts (<i>N</i> = 30) from two qualitative studies with the same two opening questions resulted in a corpus of 481 pages of pooled textual data. The data were analyzed using Utrecht's descriptive and interpretive thematic analysis approach. The interpretive thematic analysis uncovered the theme of intervening to protect and its subthemes of financial exploitation, mistreatment, and endangerment. Based on the evolving analysis, we reanalyzed the data using critical discourse analysis (CDA), drawing from Foucault and feminist CDA to explore the complex but subtle nuances of gender, power, and ideologies. CDA uncovered the theme of compulsory altruism. Ambiguity about violating personhood delayed responses to potentially dangerous behavior and actual harm. Using interpretive thematic and critical discourse analysis, we discovered a deeper understanding of female caregivers' contextual complexities, their journey to becoming a caregiver of a family member with AD/ADRD, and the power structures that relegated caregiving to female family members. This research identified a substantial policy gap in supporting female family caregivers who provide the majority of care to persons with AD/ADRD risking their health and financial security.</p>","PeriodicalId":47001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women & Aging","volume":"35 5","pages":"446-464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2022.2130655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2021, 11.3 million unpaid caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease/Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) provided 16 billion hours of unpaid caregiving worth $271.6 billion. This study aimed to fully capture the contextual complexities of the caregiving role acquisition articulated by female family caregivers of those with AD/ADRD, emphasizing assigned meaning to one's lived experience with a critical focus on how family power structures influence caregiving practices. Recorded open structured interview transcripts (N = 30) from two qualitative studies with the same two opening questions resulted in a corpus of 481 pages of pooled textual data. The data were analyzed using Utrecht's descriptive and interpretive thematic analysis approach. The interpretive thematic analysis uncovered the theme of intervening to protect and its subthemes of financial exploitation, mistreatment, and endangerment. Based on the evolving analysis, we reanalyzed the data using critical discourse analysis (CDA), drawing from Foucault and feminist CDA to explore the complex but subtle nuances of gender, power, and ideologies. CDA uncovered the theme of compulsory altruism. Ambiguity about violating personhood delayed responses to potentially dangerous behavior and actual harm. Using interpretive thematic and critical discourse analysis, we discovered a deeper understanding of female caregivers' contextual complexities, their journey to becoming a caregiver of a family member with AD/ADRD, and the power structures that relegated caregiving to female family members. This research identified a substantial policy gap in supporting female family caregivers who provide the majority of care to persons with AD/ADRD risking their health and financial security.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性照顾者的情境复杂性和阿尔茨海默病护理中的家庭权力结构。
2021年,1130万阿尔茨海默病/阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(AD/ADRD)患者的无偿照护者提供了160亿小时的无偿照护,价值2716亿美元。本研究旨在充分捕捉AD/ADRD患者的女性家庭照顾者所表达的照顾角色习得的背景复杂性,强调一个人的生活经历的分配意义,并重点关注家庭权力结构如何影响照顾实践。来自两项定性研究的开放式结构化访谈记录(N = 30),具有相同的两个开放问题,产生了481页的汇总文本数据。使用乌得勒支的描述性和解释性主题分析方法对数据进行分析。解释性专题分析揭示了干预保护的主题及其金融剥削、虐待和危害的次级主题。在进化分析的基础上,我们运用批判话语分析(CDA)对数据进行重新分析,借鉴福柯和女权主义批评性话语分析,探索性别、权力和意识形态之间复杂而微妙的细微差别。CDA揭示了强制性利他主义的主题。侵犯人格的模糊性延迟了对潜在危险行为和实际伤害的反应。通过解释性主题和批判性话语分析,我们发现了女性照顾者的情境复杂性,她们成为患有AD/ADRD的家庭成员的照顾者的过程,以及将照顾工作降级到女性家庭成员的权力结构的更深层次的理解。这项研究发现,在支持女性家庭照顾者方面存在重大政策差距,她们为面临健康和经济安全风险的AD/ADRD患者提供大部分照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Aging women in Russia: Between sexless and sexy oldies. Are gender traits and stereotypes associated with stress and burnout among midlife women? "We can't allow ourselves to fall ill": Health and (self-)discipline in female family caregivers from a gender perspective. Mediating effect of social support on the relationship between social activity and depressive symptoms among older widows in Taiwan. Gray hair and pink slips: An analysis of Twitter responses to gendered ageism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1