The Chinese Version of UHDRS in Huntington's Disease: Reliability and Validity Assessment.

IF 2.1 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Huntington's disease Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JHD-220542
Xiao-Yan Li, Yu-Feng Bao, Juan-Juan Xie, Shu-Xia Qian, Bin Gao, Miao Xu, Yi Dong, Jean-Marc Burgunder, Zhi-Ying Wu
{"title":"The Chinese Version of UHDRS in Huntington's Disease: Reliability and Validity Assessment.","authors":"Xiao-Yan Li,&nbsp;Yu-Feng Bao,&nbsp;Juan-Juan Xie,&nbsp;Shu-Xia Qian,&nbsp;Bin Gao,&nbsp;Miao Xu,&nbsp;Yi Dong,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Burgunder,&nbsp;Zhi-Ying Wu","doi":"10.3233/JHD-220542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) is a universal scale assessing disease severity of Huntington's disease (HD). However, the English version cannot be widely used in China, and the reliability and validity of the Chinese UHDRS have not yet been confirmed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the reliability and validity of Chinse UHDRS in patients with HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2013 and August 2021, 159 HD patients, 40 premanifest HD, and 64 healthy controls were consecutively recruited from two medical centers in China and assessed by Chinese UHDRS. Internal consistency and interrater reliability of the scale were examined. Intercorrelation was performed to analyze the convergent and divergent validity of the scale. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to explore the optimal cutoff point of each cognitive test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High internal consistency was found in Chinese UHDRS, and its Cronbach's alpha values of the motor, cognitive, behavioral and functional subscales were 0.954, 0.826, 0.804, and 0.954, respectively. The interrater reliability of the total motor score was 0.960. The convergent and divergent validity revealed that motor, cognitive and functional subscales strongly related to each other except for Problem Behavior Assessment. Furthermore, we not only provided the normal level of each cognitive test in controls, but also gave the optimal cutoff points of cognitive tests between controls and HD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate for the first time that the translated version of UHDRS is reliable for assessing HD patients in China. This can promote the universal use of UHDRS in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huntington's disease","volume":"11 4","pages":"407-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huntington's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JHD-220542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) is a universal scale assessing disease severity of Huntington's disease (HD). However, the English version cannot be widely used in China, and the reliability and validity of the Chinese UHDRS have not yet been confirmed.

Objective: To test the reliability and validity of Chinse UHDRS in patients with HD.

Methods: Between August 2013 and August 2021, 159 HD patients, 40 premanifest HD, and 64 healthy controls were consecutively recruited from two medical centers in China and assessed by Chinese UHDRS. Internal consistency and interrater reliability of the scale were examined. Intercorrelation was performed to analyze the convergent and divergent validity of the scale. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to explore the optimal cutoff point of each cognitive test.

Results: High internal consistency was found in Chinese UHDRS, and its Cronbach's alpha values of the motor, cognitive, behavioral and functional subscales were 0.954, 0.826, 0.804, and 0.954, respectively. The interrater reliability of the total motor score was 0.960. The convergent and divergent validity revealed that motor, cognitive and functional subscales strongly related to each other except for Problem Behavior Assessment. Furthermore, we not only provided the normal level of each cognitive test in controls, but also gave the optimal cutoff points of cognitive tests between controls and HD patients.

Conclusion: We demonstrate for the first time that the translated version of UHDRS is reliable for assessing HD patients in China. This can promote the universal use of UHDRS in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亨廷顿病UHDRS的中文版本:信度和效度评估。
背景:统一亨廷顿病评定量表(UHDRS)是评估亨廷顿病(HD)疾病严重程度的通用量表。但是,英文版本在中国不能广泛使用,中文UHDRS的信度和效度尚未得到证实。目的:检验中国HD患者UHDRS的信度和效度。方法:2013年8月至2021年8月,从中国两个医疗中心连续招募159名HD患者,40名前期HD患者和64名健康对照,并通过中国UHDRS进行评估。对量表的内部一致性和量表间信度进行了检验。通过相关分析量表的收敛效度和发散效度。对受试者进行操作特征分析,探索各认知测试的最佳分界点。结果:中文UHDRS具有较高的内部一致性,其运动、认知、行为和功能分量表的Cronbach’s alpha值分别为0.954、0.826、0.804和0.954。运动总分的解释信度为0.960。趋同效度和发散效度显示,除问题行为评估外,运动、认知和功能三个分量表的效度呈显著相关。此外,我们不仅提供了对照组各项认知测试的正常水平,还给出了对照组与HD患者之间认知测试的最佳截断点。结论:我们首次证明了翻译版本的UHDRS在评估中国HD患者方面是可靠的。这可以促进UHDRS在临床实践中的普遍应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Changes in 24(S)-Hydroxycholesterol Are Associated with Cognitive Performance in Early Huntington's Disease: Data from the TRACK and ENROLL HD Cohorts. Somatic CAG Repeat Stability in a Transgenic Sheep Model of Huntington's Disease. Mono- and Biallelic Inactivation of Huntingtin Gene in Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Reveal HTT Roles in Striatal Development and Neuronal Functions. Alterations in Cerebrospinal Fluid Urea Occur in Late Manifest Huntington's Disease. Characterizing Heart Rate Variability Response to Maximal Exercise Testing in People with Huntington's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1