The Effectiveness of Oral Immunotherapy in Patients with Sesame Anaphylaxis using Omalizumab.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinical Medicine & Research Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.3121/cmr.2022.1730
Fereshteh Salari, Mohammad Hassan Bemanian, Morteza Fallahpour, Seyed Alireza Mahdaviani, Sima Shokri, Majid Khoshmirsafa, Farhad Seif, Mohammad Nabavi, Saba Arshi
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Oral Immunotherapy in Patients with Sesame Anaphylaxis using Omalizumab.","authors":"Fereshteh Salari, Mohammad Hassan Bemanian, Morteza Fallahpour, Seyed Alireza Mahdaviani, Sima Shokri, Majid Khoshmirsafa, Farhad Seif, Mohammad Nabavi, Saba Arshi","doi":"10.3121/cmr.2022.1730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sesame allergy is the most prevalent allergy to seeds. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is defined as continuous consumption of an allergen at special doses and time. Omalizumab (Anti-IgE) increases tolerance to allergens used in OIT. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a new sesame OIT protocol in patients with sesame anaphylaxis in combination with omalizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective open-label interventional trial study, 11 patients with a history of sesame anaphylaxis were enrolled after confirmation by oral food challenge (OFC) test. At baseline, skin prick test (SPT) and skin prick to prick (SPP) test were performed. Serum sesame-specific IgE (sIgE) levels were measured. The maintenance phase was continued at home with daily sesame intake for 4 months. At the end of month 4, the OFC and above-mentioned tests were repeated to evaluate the treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 11 patients who underwent sesame OIT after 4 months could tolerate a dietary challenge of 22 ml tahini (natural sesame seed, equal to 5,000 mg of sesame protein and higher) and the average of wheal diameter in the SPT and SPP tests significantly decreased after desensitization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This OIT protocol may be a promising desensitization strategy for patients with sesame anaphylaxis. Also, omalizumab appears to have reduced the severity of reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47429,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544196/pdf/0200125.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2022.1730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sesame allergy is the most prevalent allergy to seeds. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is defined as continuous consumption of an allergen at special doses and time. Omalizumab (Anti-IgE) increases tolerance to allergens used in OIT. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a new sesame OIT protocol in patients with sesame anaphylaxis in combination with omalizumab.

Methods: In this prospective open-label interventional trial study, 11 patients with a history of sesame anaphylaxis were enrolled after confirmation by oral food challenge (OFC) test. At baseline, skin prick test (SPT) and skin prick to prick (SPP) test were performed. Serum sesame-specific IgE (sIgE) levels were measured. The maintenance phase was continued at home with daily sesame intake for 4 months. At the end of month 4, the OFC and above-mentioned tests were repeated to evaluate the treatment effectiveness.

Results: All 11 patients who underwent sesame OIT after 4 months could tolerate a dietary challenge of 22 ml tahini (natural sesame seed, equal to 5,000 mg of sesame protein and higher) and the average of wheal diameter in the SPT and SPP tests significantly decreased after desensitization.

Conclusion: This OIT protocol may be a promising desensitization strategy for patients with sesame anaphylaxis. Also, omalizumab appears to have reduced the severity of reactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用奥马珠单抗对芝麻过敏性休克患者进行口服免疫疗法的效果。
目的:芝麻过敏是最常见的种子过敏。口服免疫疗法(OIT)是指以特殊剂量和时间持续服用过敏原。奥马珠单抗(Anti-IgE)可增强对口服免疫疗法中使用的过敏原的耐受性。本研究评估了芝麻过敏性休克患者使用新的芝麻 OIT 方案和奥马珠单抗的效果:在这项前瞻性开放标签干预试验研究中,11 名有芝麻过敏性休克病史的患者经口服食物挑战(OFC)试验确认后被纳入研究。基线时,进行皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和皮肤点刺对点刺试验(SPP)。测量血清芝麻特异性 IgE(sIgE)水平。维持阶段为 4 个月,每天在家摄入芝麻。第4个月结束时,再次进行OFC和上述测试,以评估治疗效果:结果:4 个月后接受芝麻 OIT 的 11 名患者均能耐受 22 毫升芝麻酱(天然芝麻,相当于 5,000 毫克芝麻蛋白及更高)的饮食挑战,脱敏后 SPT 和 SPP 测试中的乳清直径平均值显著下降:结论:对于芝麻过敏性休克患者来说,这种 OIT 方案可能是一种很有前景的脱敏策略。结论:对于芝麻过敏性休克患者来说,这种 OIT 方案可能是一种很有前景的脱敏策略,而且奥马珠单抗似乎也能减轻反应的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine & Research
Clinical Medicine & Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine & Research is a peer reviewed publication of original scientific medical research that is relevant to a broad audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Articles are published quarterly in the following topics: -Medicine -Clinical Research -Evidence-based Medicine -Preventive Medicine -Translational Medicine -Rural Health -Case Reports -Epidemiology -Basic science -History of Medicine -The Art of Medicine -Non-Clinical Aspects of Medicine & Science
期刊最新文献
Crafting the Future Doctor: Mentorship in the First Year of Medical School. Diagnostic Accuracy of AI Algorithms in Aortic Stenosis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Extensive Invasive Sinusitis Secondary to Streptococcus Intermedius Infection. Long COVID or Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) in Children and Adolescents. Potential Application of Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP) for the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Cut-Off Determination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1